Suppr超能文献

用真、假记忆对老年人和阿尔茨海默病患者进行类比问题解决的启动。

Priming older adults and people with Alzheimer's disease analogical problem-solving with true and false memories.

机构信息

a School of Life and Medical Sciences , University of Hertfordshire , Hatfield , UK.

b Department of Psychology , City, University of London.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2019 Sep;41(7):704-714. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2019.1611742. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

Abstract

We investigated the extent to which activation of specific information in associative networks during a memory task could facilitate subsequent analogical problem solving in healthy older adults as well as those with early onset Alzheimer's disease. We also examined whether these priming effects were stronger when the activation of the critical solution term during the memory task occurred when the item was actually presented (true memories) or when this item arose due to spreading activation to a related but nonpresented item (false memory). Older adult controls (OACs) and people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) were asked to solve 9 verbal proportional analogies, 3 of which had been primed by Deese/Roediger-McDermott lists where the critical lure (and problem solution) was presented as a word in the list (true memory), 3 of which were primed by DRM lists whose critical lures were spontaneously activated during list presentation (false memory), and 3 of which were unprimed. As expected, OACs were better (both in terms of speed and accuracy) at solving problems than people with AD and both groups were better when false memories were primes than when true memories were primes or there were no primes. There were no reliable differences between unprimed and true prime problems. These findings demonstrate that (a) priming of problem solutions extends to verbal proportional analogies in OACs and people with AD, (b) false memories are more effective at priming problem solutions than true memories, and (c) there are clear positive consequences to the production of false memories.

摘要

我们研究了在记忆任务中激活联想网络中的特定信息在多大程度上可以促进健康老年人以及早期阿尔茨海默病患者随后进行类比问题解决。我们还检查了当记忆任务中关键解决项的激活是在项目实际呈现时(真实记忆)发生还是当该项目由于扩散激活到相关但未呈现的项目而发生时(虚假记忆),这些启动效应是否更强。要求老年对照组(OAC)和阿尔茨海默病患者(AD)解决 9 个口头比例类比问题,其中 3 个问题是通过 Deese/Roediger-McDermott 列表启动的,关键诱饵(和问题解决方案)作为列表中的一个词呈现(真实记忆),3 个问题是通过 DRM 列表启动的,关键诱饵在列表呈现期间自动激活(虚假记忆),还有 3 个问题没有启动。正如预期的那样,OAC 在解决问题方面的表现优于 AD 患者,并且当虚假记忆是启动时,两组患者的表现都优于真实记忆是启动时或没有启动时。未启动和真实启动问题之间没有可靠的差异。这些发现表明:(a) 在 OAC 和 AD 患者中,问题解决方案的启动扩展到口头比例类比;(b) 虚假记忆比真实记忆更有效地启动问题解决方案;(c) 虚假记忆的产生有明显的积极后果。

相似文献

6
Can false memories prime problem solutions?虚假记忆能启发问题的解决方案吗?
Cognition. 2010 Nov;117(2):176-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
9
Priming analogical reasoning with false memories.用错误记忆启动类比推理。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Aug;43(6):879-95. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0513-7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验