Howe Mark L, Akhtar Shazia
Department of Psychology, City, University of London, United Kingdom.
School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Cortex. 2020 Apr;125:318-331. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
In two experiments we investigated whether older adult controls (OACs) and people with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) benefit from false memory priming effects in subsequent problem-solving tasks. In addition, and unlike in previous false memory priming studies with older adults, we examined latency measures in the recognition phase. In Experiment 1 participants were asked to solve compound remote associate task (CRAT) problems, half of which had been preceded by the presentation of Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) lists whose critical lures (CLs) were also the solutions to those problems. In Experiment 2, we used a similar paradigm but investigated whether CLs could prime solutions to subsequent analogical reasoning problems. In this latter experiment, we also examined whether these priming effects were stronger when the activation of the CL term occurred during the memory task (was presented as part of the list; i.e., true memories) or when these items were not presented but arose during encoding due to spreading activation (i.e., false memories). We found that all three groups' performance on these tasks was facilitated only by false memories spontaneously generated from the prior presentation of DRM lists. That is, performance on CRATs and analogical reasoning tasks was better (greater accuracy and faster speed) when those problems were preceded by DRM lists whose CLs also served as the solution to those problems. These findings are consistent with previous results from studies with children, young adults, and older adults and extends them to people with more moderate AD.
在两项实验中,我们研究了老年对照者(OACs)以及患有轻度和中度阿尔茨海默病(AD)的人在后续问题解决任务中是否能从错误记忆启动效应中受益。此外,与之前针对老年人的错误记忆启动研究不同,我们在识别阶段考察了反应时指标。在实验1中,参与者被要求解决复合远程联想任务(CRAT)问题,其中一半问题之前呈现过Deese/Roediger-McDermott(DRM)列表,这些列表中的关键诱饵(CLs)也是这些问题的答案。在实验2中,我们采用了类似的范式,但研究了关键诱饵是否能启动对后续类比推理问题的答案。在后者的实验中,我们还考察了当关键诱饵项的激活发生在记忆任务期间(作为列表的一部分呈现;即真实记忆)或这些项目未呈现但在编码过程中由于扩散激活而出现(即错误记忆)时,这些启动效应是否更强。我们发现,所有三组在这些任务上的表现仅因之前呈现DRM列表而自发产生的错误记忆而得到促进。也就是说,当这些问题之前呈现的DRM列表中的关键诱饵也是这些问题的答案时,在CRAT任务和类比推理任务上的表现更好(准确率更高且速度更快)。这些发现与之前针对儿童、年轻人和老年人的研究结果一致,并将其扩展到患有更中度AD的人群。