Suppr超能文献

经会阴超声引导前列腺穿刺活检中应用阴部神经阻滞的前列腺周围局部麻醉:一项随机试验。

Periprostatic local anesthesia with pudendal block for transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Russian State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1023-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.083. Epub 2010 Jan 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effectiveness of adding pudendal block to periprostatic anesthesia for transperineal ultrasound-guided needle prostate biopsy.

METHODS

A total of 150 patients were randomized to receive periprostatic anesthesia (group 1, n = 75) or combination of periprostatic anesthesia and bilateral pudendal block (group 2, n = 75). Visual analog scale was used to evaluate discomfort at each of the following stages: anesthetic infiltration, probe insertion, biopsy punctures, and 1 hour after biopsy.

RESULTS

The overall cancer detection rate was 34.7% for the entire cohort. Injection of the local anesthetic agent was significantly more painful in group 2 (combined periprostatic and pudendal block). However, this group showed statistically significantly better pain control throughout the probe insertion, biopsy punctures, and at 1 hour after biopsy. The mean pain score of the whole procedure, calculated by averaging the pain scores at all 4 steps, was 2.41 +/- 1.01 and 1.83 +/- 0.65 in group 1 and 2, respectively (P <.001). Minor and transient complications were observed in both groups with similar frequency with the exception of penile and scrotal numbness that was reported only by patients from group 2, and in all cases resolved without treatment within 8 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of pudendal and periprostatic nerve block is a safe, effective, and useful technique that is well tolerated by the patients and improves pain reduction during transperineal prostate biopsy compared with the periprostatic anesthesia only, with no alteration in the severe complication rates.

摘要

目的

探讨经会阴超声引导前列腺穿刺活检中,在前列腺周围神经阻滞麻醉的基础上联合阴部神经阻滞的效果。

方法

将 150 例患者随机分为前列腺周围神经阻滞麻醉组(75 例)和联合阴部神经阻滞麻醉组(75 例)。两组患者分别于麻醉浸润、探头插入、活检穿刺及活检后 1 小时采用视觉模拟评分法评估不适程度。

结果

全组患者的总癌症检出率为 34.7%。联合阴部神经阻滞麻醉组(经会阴超声引导前列腺穿刺活检中,在前列腺周围神经阻滞麻醉的基础上联合阴部神经阻滞)的局部麻醉药物注射疼痛明显更剧烈。然而,该组在探头插入、活检穿刺及活检后 1 小时的疼痛控制方面具有统计学意义的显著优势。通过在所有 4 个步骤中计算疼痛评分的平均值,计算整个手术过程的平均疼痛评分,两组分别为 2.41 +/- 1.01 和 1.83 +/- 0.65(P <.001)。两组均观察到轻微且短暂的并发症,且频率相似,除了阴茎和阴囊麻木,仅在联合阴部神经阻滞麻醉组的患者中出现,所有病例均无需治疗,在 8 小时内得到缓解。

结论

阴部和前列腺周围神经阻滞联合应用是一种安全、有效且有用的技术,与单纯前列腺周围神经阻滞麻醉相比,能更好地减轻经会阴前列腺穿刺活检过程中的疼痛,且不改变严重并发症的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验