Malkoc Siddik, Fidancioglu Ahmet
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Inönü University, Malatya, Turkey.
Private Practice, Konya, Turkey.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Feb;40(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0581-x. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
The aim of our study was to investigate whether the parameters of ideal angles, ratios, and divine proportions that have been previously mentioned in the literature influence the aesthetic evaluation of Turkish adolescents.
A total of sixty patients (30 males and 30 females) were enrolled in this study. Ages of the subjects ranged from 9 to 17. Pre-treatment extra-oral photographs were taken to evaluate facial aesthetics. Two distinct panels consisting of 50 orthodontists and 50 laypersons were created for scoring the photographs of the patients. Scoring was performed using the VAS scale. Twenty-seven ratios and 19 divine proportions were measured in frontal photographs, and 26 angles were measured in profile photographs.
Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between the photograph analysis measurements and VAS scores, and then regression analyses were performed to disclose to what extent significant values may warrant the term beauty.
As a result of our investigations, none of the golden proportions was associated with facial aesthetics according to both orthodontists and laypersons. According to other angles and ratios that were measured, it was determined that orthodontists noticed the sagittal position of the lower jaw, the distance between the eyes and length of the face, whereas laypersons noticed only the distance between the eyes and length of the face.
This journal requires that the authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
我们研究的目的是调查文献中先前提到的理想角度、比例和神圣比例参数是否会影响土耳其青少年的美学评价。
本研究共纳入60例患者（30例男性和30例女性）。受试者年龄在9至17岁之间。拍摄治疗前口腔外照片以评估面部美学。创建了两个由50名正畸医生和50名外行人组成的不同小组，用于对患者照片进行评分。使用视觉模拟量表（VAS）进行评分。在正面照片中测量了27个比例和19个神圣比例，在侧面照片中测量了26个角度。
使用Pearson相关性来确定照片分析测量值与VAS评分之间的关系，然后进行回归分析以揭示显著值在多大程度上可以称得上美。
根据我们的调查，正畸医生和外行人都认为，没有一个黄金比例与面部美学相关。根据测量的其他角度和比例，确定正畸医生注意到下颌的矢状位置、两眼之间的距离和面部长度，而外行人只注意到两眼之间的距离和面部长度。
证据水平V：本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述，请参阅目录或在线作者指南www.springer.com/00266。
