Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, 1160 Marechal Deodoro St. - 3rd floor - 96020-220, Pelotas, Brazil.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 19;19(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0767-z.
BACKGROUND: The number of web-based E-epidemiologic studies using online recruitment methods is increasing. However, the optimal online recruitment method in terms of maximizing recruitment rates is still unknown. Our aim was to compare the recruitment rates of three online recruitment methods and to describe how these rates differ according to individual's socioeconomic and demographic factors. METHODS: A total of 2394 members of the 1993 Pelotas birth cohort that provided an e-mail address, a Facebook name, and a WhatsApp number during a face-to-face follow-up were randomly allocated to be recruited by e-mail, Facebook or WhatsApp (798 individuals per method). This was a parallel randomised trial applying a block randomisation (block size = 3). Between January and February 2018, we sent messages inviting them to register into the web-based coortesnaweb platform. Recruitment rates were calculated for each method, and stratified according to the individual's socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. We also analysed absolute and relative inequalities on recruitment according to schooling and socioeconomic position. RESULTS: Out of the 2394 individuals analysed, 642 registered into the platform. The overall recruitment rate was 26.8%. Recruitment rates for women were almost 10 percentage points higher compared to men. Facebook was the most effective recruitment method, as 30.6% of those invited through the social network were recruited. Recruitment rates of e-mail and WhatsApp were similar (recruitment rate = 24.9%). E-mail and Facebook were the most effective recruitment methods to invite highly educated and wealthier individuals. However, sending e-mails to recruit individuals also reflected in the highest inequalities according to schooling and socioeconomic position. In contrast, the lowest inequalities according to socioeconomic position were observed using Facebook. CONCLUSIONS: Facebook was the most effective online recruitment method, also achieving the most equitable sample in terms of schooling and socioeconomic position. The effectiveness of online recruitment methods depends on the characteristics of the sample. It is important to know the profile of the target sample in order to decide which online recruitment method to use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials, identifier: RBR-3dv7gc , retrospectively registered in 10 April 2018.
背景:使用在线招募方法的基于网络的电子流行病学研究的数量正在增加。然而,关于最大限度地提高招募率的最佳在线招募方法仍不清楚。我们的目的是比较三种在线招募方法的招募率,并描述这些招募率如何根据个人的社会经济和人口统计学因素而有所不同。
方法:共有 2394 名 1993 年佩洛塔斯出生队列的成员在面对面随访期间提供了电子邮件地址、脸书名称和 WhatsApp 号码,他们被随机分配通过电子邮件、脸书或 WhatsApp 进行招募(每种方法 798 人)。这是一项平行随机试验,采用块随机化(块大小=3)。2018 年 1 月至 2 月期间,我们发送消息邀请他们注册到基于网络的 coortesnaweb 平台。计算了每种方法的招募率,并根据个人的社会经济和人口统计学特征进行了分层。我们还分析了根据教育程度和社会经济地位在招募方面的绝对和相对不平等。
结果:在分析的 2394 名个体中,有 642 名个体注册到平台。总体招募率为 26.8%。女性的招募率比男性高近 10 个百分点。脸书是最有效的招募方法,因为通过社交网络邀请的人中,有 30.6%的人被招募。电子邮件和 WhatsApp 的招募率相似(招募率=24.9%)。电子邮件和脸书是邀请高学历和富裕人群的最有效招募方法。然而,通过电子邮件邀请个人也反映了根据教育程度和社会经济地位的最高不平等。相比之下,使用脸书观察到的社会经济地位最低的不平等。
结论:脸书是最有效的在线招募方法,在教育程度和社会经济地位方面也实现了最公平的样本。在线招募方法的有效性取决于样本的特征。了解目标样本的特征对于决定使用哪种在线招募方法很重要。
试验注册:巴西临床试验注册处,标识符:RBR-3dv7gc ,于 2018 年 4 月 10 日回顾性注册。
J Med Internet Res. 2019-3-6
J Med Internet Res. 2017-3-1
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2025-3-12
J Med Internet Res. 2022-8-4
Int J Epidemiol. 2018-10-1
J Med Internet Res. 2017-3-1
J Med Internet Res. 2015-7-22
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015-7