• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西佩洛塔斯出生队列 1993 年参与者的测量体重、身高和 BMI 与基于网络的自我报告数据之间的一致性:一项横断面验证研究。

Agreement between measured weight, height and BMI and Web-based self-reported data in participants of the 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort, Brazil: a cross-sectional validation study.

机构信息

Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.

Causale Consultoria, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2023 Jul 28;32(2):e2022590. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222023000200013. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1590/S2237-96222023000200013
PMID:37531484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10379011/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the agreement between measured height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) during the 22-year follow-up of the 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, and self-reported data during the online follow-up of the coortesnaweb.

METHODS

this was a cross-sectional validation study; agreement was assessed by means of Lin's concordance correlation coefficient for continuous measures and weighted Kappa for nutritional status; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to estimate the correlation between measurements.

RESULTS

a total of 783 participants were included; it could be seen high correlation and high agreement between the measured height (r = 0.966; ρ = 0.966), weight (r = 0.934; ρ = 0.928), and BMI (r = 0.903; ρ = 0.910) and Web-based self-reported data; there was no correlation between mean difference and the time interval between measurements.

CONCLUSION

using the Internet to collect self-reported anthropometric measurements is as valid as the traditional method.

摘要

目的

评估巴西南里奥格兰德州佩洛塔斯 1993 年出生队列在 22 年随访期间测量的身高、体重和体重指数(BMI)与队列网站在线随访期间自我报告数据的一致性。

方法

这是一项横断面验证研究;通过连续测量的林氏一致性相关系数和营养状况的加权 Kappa 评估一致性;Spearman 秩相关系数用于估计测量值之间的相关性。

结果

共纳入 783 名参与者;可以看出,测量身高(r = 0.966;ρ = 0.966)、体重(r = 0.934;ρ = 0.928)和 BMI(r = 0.903;ρ = 0.910)与基于网络的自我报告数据之间存在高度相关性和高度一致性;测量值之间的平均差异与时间间隔之间没有相关性。

结论

使用互联网收集自我报告的人体测量数据与传统方法一样有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1993/10379011/2813a77ab57d/2237-9622-ress-32-02-e2022590-gch1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1993/10379011/cdbc1fc8f8d0/2237-9622-ress-32-02-e2022590-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1993/10379011/4e11b05628d2/2237-9622-ress-32-02-e2022590-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1993/10379011/2813a77ab57d/2237-9622-ress-32-02-e2022590-gch1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1993/10379011/cdbc1fc8f8d0/2237-9622-ress-32-02-e2022590-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1993/10379011/4e11b05628d2/2237-9622-ress-32-02-e2022590-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1993/10379011/2813a77ab57d/2237-9622-ress-32-02-e2022590-gch1.jpg

相似文献

1
Agreement between measured weight, height and BMI and Web-based self-reported data in participants of the 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort, Brazil: a cross-sectional validation study.巴西佩洛塔斯出生队列 1993 年参与者的测量体重、身高和 BMI 与基于网络的自我报告数据之间的一致性:一项横断面验证研究。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2023 Jul 28;32(2):e2022590. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222023000200013. eCollection 2023.
2
Validity of web-based self-reported weight and height: results of the Nutrinet-Santé study.基于网络的自我报告体重和身高的有效性:Nutrinet-Santé研究结果
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 8;15(8):e152. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2575.
3
Validity of self-reported weight and height: a cross-sectional study among Malaysian adolescents.自我报告体重和身高的有效性:一项针对马来西亚青少年的横断面研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0362-0.
4
Web-based self-reported height, weight, and body mass index among Swedish adolescents: a validation study.瑞典青少年基于网络的自我报告身高、体重和体重指数:一项验证性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 18;17(3):e73. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3947.
5
Validity of self-reported weight and height for BMI classification: A cross-sectional study among young adults.自我报告的体重和身高用于BMI分类的有效性:一项针对年轻人的横断面研究。
Nutrition. 2020 Mar;71:110622. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2019.110622. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
6
How accurate is web-based self-reported height, weight, and body mass index in young adults?基于网络自我报告的年轻人身高、体重和体重指数的准确性如何?
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 7;16(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2909.
7
Accuracy of Parent-Reported Child Height and Weight and Calculated Body Mass Index Compared With Objectively Measured Anthropometrics: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.与客观测量的人体测量学相比,父母报告的儿童身高、体重及计算得出的体重指数的准确性:一项随机对照试验的二次分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 16;21(9):e12532. doi: 10.2196/12532.
8
Agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and measured first-trimester weight in Brazilian women.巴西女性自我报告的孕前体重与孕早期测量体重的一致性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 26;20(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03354-4.
9
Validation and calibration of self-reported weight and height from individuals in the city of São Paulo.圣保罗市居民自我报告的体重和身高的验证与校准。
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2014 Jul-Sep;17(3):735-46. doi: 10.1590/1809-4503201400030013.
10
Accuracy of Self-Reported Height, Weight, and BMI Over Time in Emerging Adults.成年人随时间推移的自我报告身高、体重和 BMI 的准确性。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Jun;56(6):860-868. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between cognitive restraint, emotional eating, uncontrolled eating, and body mass index among health care professionals.医疗保健专业人员的认知抑制、情绪化进食、无节制进食与体重指数之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):2570. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86419-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity of self-reported body mass and height: relation with sex, age, physical activity, and cardiometabolic risk factors.自我报告的体重和身高的有效性:与性别、年龄、身体活动和心血管代谢危险因素的关系。
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2021 Aug 9;24:e210043. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720210043. eCollection 2021.
2
Validity of self-reported weight and height for BMI classification: A cross-sectional study among young adults.自我报告的体重和身高用于BMI分类的有效性:一项针对年轻人的横断面研究。
Nutrition. 2020 Mar;71:110622. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2019.110622. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
3
Paper-Based Versus Web-Based Versions of Self-Administered Questionnaires, Including Food-Frequency Questionnaires: Prospective Cohort Study.
纸质版与网络版自填式问卷(包括食物频率问卷)的比较:前瞻性队列研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019 Oct 1;5(4):e11997. doi: 10.2196/11997.
4
Objective vs self-report assessment of height, weight and body mass index: Relationships with adiposity, aerobic fitness and physical activity.身高、体重和体重指数的客观评估与自我报告评估:与肥胖、有氧适能和身体活动的关系
Clin Obes. 2019 Oct;9(5):e12331. doi: 10.1111/cob.12331. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
5
How different online recruitment methods impact on recruitment rates for the web-based coortesnaweb project: a randomised trial.不同的在线招聘方法如何影响基于网络的队列研究项目的招聘率:一项随机试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 19;19(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0767-z.
6
Creating a database of internet-based clinical trials to support a public-led research programme: A descriptive analysis.创建基于互联网的临床试验数据库以支持公众主导的研究项目:描述性分析。
Digit Health. 2015 Nov 20;1:2055207615617854. doi: 10.1177/2055207615617854. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.
7
[Not Available].[不可用]。
J Vasc Bras. 2016 Apr-Jun;15(2):89-92. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.004216.
8
Traditional methods new technologies - dilemmas for dietary assessment in large-scale nutrition surveys and studies: a report following an international panel discussion at the 9th International Conference on Diet and Activity Methods (ICDAM9), Brisbane, 3 September 2015.传统方法与新技术——大规模营养调查和研究中膳食评估面临的困境:2015年9月3日于布里斯班举行的第9届饮食与活动方法国际会议(ICDAM9)国际小组讨论后的报告
J Nutr Sci. 2018 Apr 2;7:e11. doi: 10.1017/jns.2018.4. eCollection 2018.
9
Cohort Profile Update: The 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort follow-up at 22 years.队列研究简介更新:1993年巴西佩洛塔斯出生队列22岁时的随访情况。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 1;47(5):1389-1390e. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx249.
10
Transition of care to an adult provider.将护理工作交接给成年医疗服务提供者。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;29(5):295-300. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000401.