Marqusee S, Baldwin R L
Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University Medical Center, CA 94305.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(24):8898-902. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.24.8898.
Four alanine-based peptides were designed, synthesized, and tested by circular dichroism for alpha-helix formation in H2O. Each peptide has three glutamic/lysine residue pairs, is 16 or 17 amino acids long, and has blocked alpha-NH2 and alpha-COOH groups. In one set of peptides ("i+4"), the glutamic and lysine residues are spaced 4 residues or 1 residue apart. In the other set ("i+3"), the spacing is 3 or 2 residues. Within each of these sets, a pair of peptides was made in which the positions of the glutamic and lysine residues are reversed [Glu, Lys (E,K) vs. Lys, Glu (K,E)] in order to assess the interaction of the charged side chains with the helix dipole. Since the amino acid compositions of these peptides differ at most by a single alanine residue, differences in helicity are caused chiefly by the spacing and positions of the charged residues. The basic aim of this study was to test for helix stabilization by (Glu-, Lys+) ion pairs or salt bridges (H-bonded ion pairs). The results are as follows. (i) All four peptides show significant helix formation, and the stability of the alpha-helix does not depend on peptide concentration in the range studied. The best helix-former is (i+4)E,K, which shows approximately 80% helicity in 0.01 M NaCl at pH 7 and 0 degree C. (ii) The two i+4 peptides show more helix formation than the i+3 peptides. pH titration gives no evidence for helix stabilization by i+3 ion pairs. (iii) Surprisingly, the i+4 peptides form more stable helices than the i+3 peptides at extremes of pH (pH 2 and pH 12) as well as at pH 7. These results may be explained by helix stabilization through Glu-...Lys+ salt bridges at pH 7 and singly charged H bonds at pH 2 (Glu0...Lys+) and pH 12 (Glu-...Lys0). The reason why these links stabilize the alpha-helix more effectively in the i+4 than in the i+3 peptides is not known. (iv) Reversal of the positions of glutamic and lysine residues usually affects helix stability in the manner expected for interaction of these charged groups with the helix dipole. (v) alpha-Helix formation in these alanine-based peptides is enthalpy-driven, as is helix formation by the C-peptide of ribonuclease A.
设计、合成了四种基于丙氨酸的肽,并通过圆二色性检测其在水中形成α-螺旋的情况。每种肽都有三对谷氨酸/赖氨酸残基,长度为16或17个氨基酸,且α-NH2和α-COOH基团被封闭。在一组肽(“i + 4”)中,谷氨酸和赖氨酸残基相隔4个残基或1个残基。在另一组(“i + 3”)中,间隔为3个或2个残基。在每组中,制备了一对肽,其中谷氨酸和赖氨酸残基的位置颠倒[谷氨酸,赖氨酸(E,K)对赖氨酸,谷氨酸(K,E)],以评估带电侧链与螺旋偶极子的相互作用。由于这些肽的氨基酸组成最多相差一个丙氨酸残基,螺旋度的差异主要由带电残基的间隔和位置引起。本研究的基本目的是测试(谷氨酸 - ,赖氨酸 + )离子对或盐桥(氢键结合的离子对)对螺旋的稳定作用。结果如下。(i)所有四种肽都显示出显著的螺旋形成,并且在研究的浓度范围内,α-螺旋的稳定性不依赖于肽浓度。最佳的螺旋形成肽是(i + 4)E,K,在pH 7和0℃的0.01 M NaCl中显示出约80%的螺旋度。(ii)两种i + 4肽比i + 3肽显示出更多的螺旋形成。pH滴定没有证据表明i + 3离子对能稳定螺旋。(iii)令人惊讶的是,在极端pH值(pH 2和pH 12)以及pH 7时,i + 4肽形成的螺旋比i + 3肽更稳定。这些结果可以通过在pH 7时通过谷氨酸 -...赖氨酸 + 盐桥以及在pH 2(谷氨酸0...赖氨酸 + )和pH 12(谷氨酸 -...赖氨酸0)时通过单电荷氢键来稳定螺旋来解释。这些连接在i + 4肽中比在i + 3肽中更有效地稳定α-螺旋的原因尚不清楚。(iv)谷氨酸和赖氨酸残基位置的颠倒通常以这些带电基团与螺旋偶极子相互作用所预期的方式影响螺旋稳定性。(v)这些基于丙氨酸的肽中的α-螺旋形成是由焓驱动的,核糖核酸酶A的C肽形成螺旋也是如此。