Curran Patrick J, Cole Veronica T, Bauer Daniel J, Rothenberg W Andrew, Hussong Andrea M
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Struct Equ Modeling. 2018;25(6):860-875. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2018.1473773. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
Although it is currently best-practice to directly model latent factors whenever feasible, there remain many situations in which this approach is not tractable. Recent advances in covariate-informed factor score estimation can be used to provide manifest scores that are used in second-stage analysis, but these are currently understudied. Here we extend our prior work on factor score recovery to examine the use of factor score estimates as predictors both in the presence and absence of the same covariates that were used in score estimation. Results show that whereas the relation between the factor score estimates and the criterion are typically well recovered, substantial bias and increased variability is evident in the covariate effects themselves. Importantly, using covariate-informed factor score estimates substantially, and often wholly, mitigates these biases. We conclude with implications for future research and recommendations for the use of factor score estimates in practice.
尽管目前只要可行就直接对潜在因素进行建模是最佳实践方法,但仍有许多情况使得这种方法难以处理。协变量信息因子得分估计的最新进展可用于提供在第二阶段分析中使用的显式得分,但目前对这些得分的研究还不够充分。在这里,我们扩展了我们之前关于因子得分恢复的工作,以检验在存在和不存在用于得分估计的相同协变量的情况下,将因子得分估计用作预测变量的情况。结果表明,虽然因子得分估计与标准之间的关系通常能很好地恢复,但协变量效应本身存在明显的偏差和变异性增加。重要的是,大量使用且通常是完全使用协变量信息因子得分估计可以减轻这些偏差。我们最后讨论了对未来研究的启示以及在实践中使用因子得分估计的建议。