Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, DNA Replication and Genome Integrity, Martinsried, Germany.
Curr Genet. 2020 Feb;66(1):59-62. doi: 10.1007/s00294-019-01007-4. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
DNA damage occurs abundantly during normal cellular proliferation. This necessitates that cellular DNA damage response and checkpoint pathways monitor the cellular DNA damage load and that DNA damage signaling is quantitative. Yet, how DNA lesions are counted and converted into a quantitative response remains poorly understood. We have recently obtained insights into this question investigating DNA damage signaling elicited by single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Intriguingly, our findings suggest that local and global DNA damage signaling react differentially to increasing amounts of DNA damage. In this mini-review, we will discuss these findings and put them into perspective of current knowledge on the DNA damage response.
在正常的细胞增殖过程中,DNA 损伤大量发生。这就要求细胞的 DNA 损伤反应和检测点途径监测细胞的 DNA 损伤负荷,并且 DNA 损伤信号是定量的。然而,DNA 损伤如何被计数并转化为定量反应仍知之甚少。我们最近在研究由单链 DNA(ssDNA)引发的 DNA 损伤信号时,对这个问题有了一些了解。有趣的是,我们的发现表明,局部和全局的 DNA 损伤信号对不断增加的 DNA 损伤的反应不同。在这篇综述中,我们将讨论这些发现,并将其置于当前 DNA 损伤反应知识的背景下。
Curr Genet. 2019-6-21
Int J Radiat Biol. 2018-9-25
Methods Mol Biol. 2014
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013-9-4
Mol Cell. 2019-9-24
Mutat Res. 2009-12-16
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2025-7-16
Cell Tissue Res. 2022-9
Int J Mol Sci. 2021-4-13
Cancers (Basel). 2021-3-30
Arch Toxicol. 2020-4
Curr Genet. 2019-7-22
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2019-5
Curr Genet. 2018-6-8
Genes Dev. 2017-11-15
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2017-1-9
DNA Repair (Amst). 2016-11
Mol Cell Oncol. 2016-3-10
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015-8-18