School of Social Work, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Sep;51(8):958-966. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.04.017. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
To assess the impact of a multilevel nutrition intervention for low-income child care environments, staff, and center-enrolled children.
A cluster-randomized, controlled trial conducted among eligible centers. Staff and parent self-report surveys and objective field observations at baseline and follow-up were conducted.
A total of 22 low-income child care centers (enrolling ≥ 25 2- to 5-year-old children).
Children aged 18-71 months; 408 children and 97 staff were randomized into intervention (208 children and 50 staff) and waitlist-control groups (200 children and 45 staff). Retention rates were high (87% for children and 93% for staff).
INTERVENTION(S): A 6-session, 6-month director's child nutrition course with on-site technical support for center teachers.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Center nutrition/physical activity environment; staff feeding styles, dietary patterns, and attitudes about food; child food preferences and dietary patterns.
Covariance regression analyses to assess the intervention effect, adjusting for clustering within centers.
Significant intervention effects were found for the center nutrition training/education environment (b = 3.01; P = .03), nutrition total scores (b = 1.29; P = .04), and staff-level prompting/encouraging feeding styles (b = 0.38; P = .04). No significant intervention effects were found for child-level measures.
Curriculum-driven training and implementation support improved nutritional policies and practices and staff-child interactions during meals. Future research could extend the intervention to families and the evaluation to children's dietary behaviors and weight changes.
评估针对低收入儿童照护环境、工作人员和中心入托儿童的多层次营养干预措施的效果。
在符合条件的中心中进行的一项整群随机对照试验。在基线和随访时进行工作人员和家长的自我报告调查以及现场客观观察。
共 22 家低收入儿童照护中心(入托 25 名及以上 2 至 5 岁儿童)。
年龄 18-71 个月的儿童;408 名儿童和 97 名工作人员被随机分为干预组(208 名儿童和 50 名工作人员)和候补对照组(200 名儿童和 45 名工作人员)。儿童和工作人员的保留率均较高(分别为 87%和 93%)。
为期 6 节、为期 6 个月的主任儿童营养课程,为中心教师提供现场技术支持。
中心营养/体育活动环境;工作人员喂养方式、饮食模式和对食物的态度;儿童食物偏好和饮食模式。
协方差回归分析评估干预效果,调整中心内聚类因素。
中心营养培训/教育环境(b=3.01;P=.03)、营养总分(b=1.29;P=.04)和工作人员的提示/鼓励喂养方式(b=0.38;P=.04)方面,干预具有显著效果。但在儿童层面的措施上,未发现干预效果。
课程驱动的培训和实施支持提高了营养政策和实践水平,以及用餐期间工作人员与儿童的互动。未来的研究可以将干预措施扩展到家庭,并对儿童的饮食行为和体重变化进行评估。