J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Feb;118(2):252-260. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
The validity of using the Remote Food Photography Method (RFPM) for measuring food intake of minority preschool children's intake is not well documented.
Our aim was to determine the validity of intake estimations made by human raters using the RFPM compared with those obtained by weighing all foods and beverages consumed by 3- to 5-year-old children (weighed method).
We conducted a cross-sectional observational study.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTINGS: A convenience sample of 54 3- to 5-year-old Hispanic and African-American children were observed during a 12-hour period at Baylor Metabolic Research Unit between June 2013 and January 2014.
All foods/beverages consumed by the children were provided by Baylor research coordinators who took and wirelessly transmitted before-and-after pictures of the trays to trained human raters at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center who estimated grams consumed. Energy and macronutrients were calculated using the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies or food facts data provided by manufacturers.
Paired t test, mean differences, and Bland-Altman limits of agreement were performed.
Compared to the weighed method, the rater method significantly overestimated total intake by 34±71 g (P<0.0001), with a mean percent error of 2.9% (root mean square error=7.1%), and total energy intake by 75±102 kcal (P<0.0001), with a mean percent error of 7.5% (root mean square error=12.3%). The standard error for the macronutrient intakes ranged from 11.0% to 20.2%. The Bland-Altman approach demonstrated a positive slope for the rater method relative to the weighed method for total intake in grams (P=0.006), carbohydrate (P=0.01), and protein (P=0.01) (ie, magnitude of the bias increased with increasing intakes).
The rater method overestimated total intake in grams and energy in kilocalories in minority preschool children in a well-controlled condition and needs to be further tested in a free-living environment.
使用远程食物摄影法(RFPM)测量少数民族学龄前儿童食物摄入量的有效性尚未得到充分证明。
我们旨在确定人类评估者使用 RFPM 进行的摄入量估计与通过称重所有食物和饮料(称重法)获得的摄入量之间的相关性。
我们进行了一项横断面观察性研究。
参与者/设置:2013 年 6 月至 2014 年 1 月期间,在贝勒代谢研究单位,对 54 名 3 至 5 岁的西班牙裔和非裔美国儿童进行了 12 小时的观察。
由贝勒研究协调员为儿童提供所有食物/饮料,他们在饭前和饭后拍摄托盘照片,并通过无线网络将照片发送给彭宁顿生物医学研究中心的经过培训的人类评估员,评估消耗的克数。能量和宏量营养素使用饮食研究的食物和营养素数据库或制造商提供的食物事实数据进行计算。
进行配对 t 检验、均值差异和 Bland-Altman 一致性界限分析。
与称重法相比,评估者法显著高估了总摄入量 34±71 克(P<0.0001),平均误差百分比为 2.9%(均方根误差=7.1%),总能量摄入量高估了 75±102 千卡(P<0.0001),平均误差百分比为 7.5%(均方根误差=12.3%)。宏量营养素摄入量的标准误差范围为 11.0%至 20.2%。Bland-Altman 方法显示,评估者法相对于称重法,在总摄入量(克)(P=0.006)、碳水化合物(P=0.01)和蛋白质(P=0.01)方面存在正斜率(即,偏差幅度随摄入量增加而增加)。
在严格控制的条件下,评估者法高估了少数民族学龄前儿童的总摄入量和千卡能量,需要在自由生活环境中进一步测试。