Division of Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, School of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, SE1 0AA, UK.
Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London (UCL), London, WCIE 7JE, UK.
Environ Manage. 2019 Aug;64(2):230-244. doi: 10.1007/s00267-019-01178-3. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
Over the past few decades, life cycle assessment (LCA) has been established as a critical tool for the evaluation of the environmental burdens of chemical processes and materials cycles. The increasing amount of plastic solid waste (PSW) in landfills has raised serious concern worldwide for the most effective treatment. Thermochemical post-treatment processes, such as pyrolysis, seem to be the most appropriate method to treat this type of waste in an effective manner. This is because such processes lead to the production of useful chemicals, or hydrocarbon oil of high calorific value (i.e. bio-oil in the case of pyrolysis). LCA appears to be the most appropriate tool for the process design from an environmental context. However, addressed limitations including initial assumptions, functional unit and system boundaries, as well as lack of regional database and exclusion of socio-economic aspects, may hinder the final decision. This review aims to address the benefits of pyrolysis as a method for PSW treatment and raise the limitations and gaps of conducted research via an environmental standpoint.
在过去几十年中,生命周期评估(LCA)已成为评估化学工艺和材料循环环境负担的重要工具。越来越多的塑料固体废弃物(PSW)在垃圾填埋场中,这引起了全世界对最有效处理方法的严重关注。热化学后处理工艺,如热解,似乎是处理这种类型废物的最有效方法。这是因为这些工艺会产生有用的化学物质,或高热值的烃油(即热解情况下的生物油)。从环境角度来看,LCA 似乎是最适合工艺设计的工具。然而,包括初始假设、功能单元和系统边界,以及缺乏区域数据库和排除社会经济方面等局限性,可能会阻碍最终决策。本综述旨在从环境角度出发,探讨热解作为 PSW 处理方法的优势,并提出研究中的局限性和差距。