• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BIOFLOW-IV 是一项随机、洲际、多中心研究,旨在评估 Orsiro 西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗初发冠状动脉病变患者的安全性和有效性:12 个月时的主要终点靶血管失败。

BIOFLOW-IV, a randomised, intercontinental, multicentre study to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of subjects with de novo coronary artery lesions: primary outcome target vessel failure at 12 months.

机构信息

Okinawa Tokushukai Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2019 Dec 6;15(11):e1006-e1013. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01214.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01214
PMID:31235458
Abstract

AIMS

The BIOFLOW-IV clinical trial was designed for regulatory submission in Japan. It assessed the safety and efficacy of a new third-generation sirolimus-eluting stent system with bioresorbable polymer (Orsiro, BP-SES) compared with an everolimus-eluting stent system with permanent polymer (XIENCE Prime/Xpedition, PP-EES).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective, international, multicentre, 2:1 randomised, non-inferiority trial enrolled 575 patients (385 BP-SES and 190 PP-EES) with 659 stenotic de novo lesions. Of these, 137 patients (23.8%) were Japanese. Follow-up until five years is ongoing. We herein report outcomes at 12 months. Baseline parameters were well balanced. Device success was 98.9% for BP-SES versus 99.6% for PP-EES, p=0.670. Non-inferiority related to 12-month target vessel failure was met (pnon-inferiority <0.001). Further, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups. The target vessel failure rate was 5.5% for BP-SES and 7.5% for PP-EES, the target lesion failure rate was 4.2% versus 5.4%, and the definite or probable stent thrombosis rate was 0.8% versus 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The randomised BIOFLOW-IV trial provides further evidence on the safety and efficacy of the Orsiro BP-SES and its non-inferiority to the current benchmark, an everolimus-eluting permanent polymer stent. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01939249.

摘要

目的

BIOFLOW-IV 临床试验旨在向日本监管机构提交申请。该试验评估了一种新型第三代西罗莫司洗脱支架系统(载有生物可吸收聚合物的 Orsiro,BP-SES)与载有永久性聚合物的依维莫司洗脱支架系统(XIENCE Prime/Xpedition,PP-EES)相比的安全性和有效性。

方法和结果

这是一项前瞻性、国际性、多中心、2:1 随机、非劣效性试验,共纳入 575 例(385 例 BP-SES 和 190 例 PP-EES)伴有 659 处新发狭窄病变的患者。其中 137 例(23.8%)为日本人。目前正在进行为期五年的随访。本文报告了 12 个月时的结果。基线参数均衡。BP-SES 的器械成功率为 98.9%,PP-EES 为 99.6%,p=0.670。12 个月时达到了与非劣效性相关的终点(p非劣效性<0.001)。此外,两组间临床结果无显著差异。BP-SES 的靶血管失败率为 5.5%,PP-EES 为 7.5%,靶病变失败率分别为 4.2%和 5.4%,明确或可能的支架血栓形成率分别为 0.8%和 0%。

结论

随机的 BIOFLOW-IV 试验进一步证明了 Orsiro BP-SES 的安全性和有效性,以及其与目前的基准(即依维莫司洗脱永久性聚合物支架)相比的非劣效性。ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01939249。

相似文献

1
BIOFLOW-IV, a randomised, intercontinental, multicentre study to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of subjects with de novo coronary artery lesions: primary outcome target vessel failure at 12 months.BIOFLOW-IV 是一项随机、洲际、多中心研究,旨在评估 Orsiro 西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗初发冠状动脉病变患者的安全性和有效性:12 个月时的主要终点靶血管失败。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Dec 6;15(11):e1006-e1013. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01214.
2
Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial.超薄生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:随机 BIOFLOW V 试验 3 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 8;13(11):1343-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.019.
3
Comparison of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Calcified or Small Vessel Lesions.超薄生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架在钙化或小血管病变中的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep;13(9):e009189. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009189. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
4
Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中比较超薄可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的亚组分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e007331. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007331.
5
Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.超亲生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 25;72(25):3287-3297. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.019. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
6
Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: BIOFLOW V Final 5-Year Outcomes.超亲生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架比较:BIOFLOW V 研究 5 年最终结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Sep 26;15(18):1852-1860. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.07.027.
7
A randomized, prospective, intercontinental evaluation of a bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system: the CENTURY II (Clinical Evaluation of New Terumo Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease) trial.一种生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的随机、前瞻性、洲际评估:CENTURY II(新型泰尔茂药物洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗冠状动脉疾病患者的临床评估)试验。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Aug 7;35(30):2021-31. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu210. Epub 2014 May 19.
8
Rationale of a novel study design for the BIOFLOW V study, a prospective, randomized multicenter study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Orsiro sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system using a Bayesian approach.BIOFLOW V研究是一项前瞻性、随机多中心研究,旨在使用贝叶斯方法评估Orsiro西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的安全性和有效性。本新型研究设计的原理。
Am Heart J. 2017 Nov;193:35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
9
Bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent compared with permanent polymer everolimus-eluting coronary stent implantation for treatment of small vessel coronary artery disease: CENTURY II trial.生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架与永久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架植入治疗小血管冠状动脉疾病的比较:CENTURY II试验
EuroIntervention. 2016 Jun 12;12(2):e167-74. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I2A30.
10
A randomised comparison of a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: clinical and angiographic follow-up of the TARGET I trial.靶向研究 I 试验:新型无内膜凹槽填充型可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的随机比较:临床和血管造影随访结果
EuroIntervention. 2013 May 20;9(1):75-83. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I1A12.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical safety and performance of a biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent in an all-comers population: results from the S-FLEX Russia registry.可生物降解聚合物涂层西罗莫司洗脱支架在所有患者人群中的临床安全性和性能:来自俄罗斯S-FLEX注册研究的结果
AsiaIntervention. 2025 Jul 30;11(2):e101-e109. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00045. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Safety and efficacy of Evermine50 Everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in patients with native coronary artery lesions: Three-year outcomes from a single-center.依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统(Evermine50)在原发性冠状动脉病变患者中的安全性和有效性:单中心三年随访结果
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2025 Mar 18;17(1):58-65. doi: 10.34172/jcvtr.025.33123. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Safety and Efficacy of Two Ultrathin Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Real-World Practice: Genoss DES Stents Versus Orsiro Stents From a Prospective Registry.
两种超薄可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架在实际临床中的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性注册研究中Genoss药物洗脱支架与Orsiro支架的对比
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Dec;47(12):e70060. doi: 10.1002/clc.70060.
4
Comparative effectiveness of ultrathin vs. standard strut drug-eluting stents: insights from a large-scale meta-analysis with extended follow-up.超小径药物洗脱支架与标准支架的比较效果:一项具有延长随访的大规模荟萃分析的见解。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jul 27;29(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01949-7.
5
Evolution of Coronary Stent Platforms: A Brief Overview of Currently Used Drug-Eluting Stents.冠状动脉支架平台的演变:当前使用的药物洗脱支架简要概述。
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 24;12(21):6711. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216711.
6
One- and two-year clinical outcomes of treatment with resorbable magnesium scaffolds for coronary artery disease: the prospective, international, multicentre BIOSOLVE-IV registry.可吸收镁支架治疗冠状动脉疾病的一年和两年临床结果:前瞻性、国际、多中心 BIOSOLVE-IV 注册研究。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Jun 19;19(3):232-239. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-01069.
7
Patients with higher-atherothrombotic risk vs. lower-atherothrombotic risk undergoing coronary intervention with newer-generation drug-eluting stents: an analysis from the randomized BIOFLOW trials.接受新一代药物洗脱支架介入治疗的高动脉血栓形成风险与低动脉血栓形成风险的患者:来自随机 BIOFLOW 试验的分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Sep;112(9):1278-1287. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02205-4. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
8
A Narrative Review of Ultrathin-strut Drug-eluting Stents: The Thinner the Better?超薄支柱药物洗脱支架的叙述性综述:越薄越好?
Heart Int. 2021 Dec 21;15(2):84-93. doi: 10.17925/HI.2021.15.2.84. eCollection 2021.
9
Ultrathin Struts Drug-Eluting Stents: A State-of-the-Art Review.超薄支架药物洗脱支架:最新综述
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 25;12(9):1378. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091378.
10
Complex vs. non-complex percutaneous coronary intervention with newer-generation drug-eluting stents: an analysis from the randomized BIOFLOW trials.新一代药物洗脱支架的复杂与非复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:来自随机 BIOFLOW 试验的分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Jul;111(7):795-805. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-01994-4. Epub 2022 Feb 25.