Suppr超能文献

揭开医学文献的神秘面纱。

Demystifying the Medical Literature.

作者信息

Greeley Christopher

机构信息

Baylor College of Medicine - Pediatrics.

出版信息

Acad Forensic Pathol. 2016 Dec;6(4):556-567. doi: 10.23907/2016.055. Epub 2016 Dec 1.

Abstract

The published literature is not just the ongoing record of current medical and scientific knowledge; it is a record of the past and can give an eye toward future knowledge. Reading the published literature can give a view of the evolution of knowledge on a particular question, the growth of a discipline, the identification of new diseases, and the refinement of diagnostic tests. The reality is that most busy physicians read only the abstract of an article. The purpose of this article is to place published medical literature into a context and to provide some considerations for critically evaluating articles. This paper will provide historic background of evidence-based medicine and medical publications. Specific strategies for critical literature appraisal are highlights and pitfalls to avoid are outlined.

摘要

已发表的文献不仅是当前医学和科学知识的持续记录;它还是过去的记录,并且能够展望未来的知识。阅读已发表的文献可以让人了解关于某个特定问题的知识演变、一个学科的发展、新疾病的识别以及诊断测试的完善情况。实际情况是,大多数忙碌的医生只阅读文章的摘要。本文的目的是将已发表的医学文献置于一定背景下,并提供一些批判性评估文章的注意事项。本文将提供循证医学和医学出版物的历史背景。重点介绍批判性文献评估的具体策略,并概述应避免的陷阱。

相似文献

1
Demystifying the Medical Literature.
Acad Forensic Pathol. 2016 Dec;6(4):556-567. doi: 10.23907/2016.055. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
4
5
[Testing critical reading of medical journal articles: reliability and validity].
Presse Med. 2007 Apr;36(4 Pt 1):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2006.12.023. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
9
Information excess in medicine. Overview, relevance to dermatology, and strategies for coping.
Arch Dermatol. 1992 Sep;128(9):1249-56. doi: 10.1001/archderm.128.9.1249.

本文引用的文献

1
EBHC pyramid 5.0 for accessing preappraised evidence and guidance.
Evid Based Med. 2016 Aug;21(4):123-5. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110447. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
2
Does evidence-based health care have room for the self?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Aug;22(4):502-8. doi: 10.1111/jep.12563. Epub 2016 May 30.
3
The forensic implications of predatory publishing.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2016 Dec;12(4):391-393. doi: 10.1007/s12024-016-9771-3. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
4
An epistemological shift: from evidence-based medicine to epistemological responsibility.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Jun;21(3):433-9. doi: 10.1111/jep.12282. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
5
Who's afraid of peer review?
Science. 2013 Oct 4;342(6154):60-5. doi: 10.1126/science.2013.342.6154.342_60.
6
Novel classification system of rib fractures observed in infants.
J Forensic Sci. 2013 Mar;58(2):330-5. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12054. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
7
Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.
J Med Ethics. 2011 Sep;37(9):567-70. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040964. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
8
On the impossibility of being expert.
BMJ. 2010 Dec 14;341:c6815. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6815.
9
The GRADE approach and Bradford Hill's criteria for causation.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 May;65(5):392-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.119933. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
10
Identifying and avoiding bias in research.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Aug;126(2):619-625. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验