• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规血压与新发糖尿病风险:来自410万成年人的证据及前瞻性研究的荟萃分析

Usual Blood Pressure and Risk of New-Onset Diabetes: Evidence From 4.1 Million Adults and a Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.

作者信息

Emdin Connor A, Anderson Simon G, Woodward Mark, Rahimi Kazem

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

The George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Oct 6;66(14):1552-1562. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.059.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.059
PMID:26429079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4595710/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reliable quantification of the association between blood pressure (BP) and risk of type 2 diabetes is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the association between usual BP and risk of diabetes, overall and by participant characteristics.

METHODS

A cohort of 4.1 million adults, free of diabetes and cardiovascular disease, was identified using validated linked electronic health records. Analyses were complemented by a meta-analysis of prospective studies that reported relative risks of new-onset diabetes per unit of systolic blood pressure (SBP).

RESULTS

Among the overall cohort, 20 mm Hg higher SBP and 10 mm Hg higher diastolic BP were associated with a 58% and a 52% higher risk of new-onset diabetes (hazard ratio: 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56 to 1.59; and hazard ratio: 1.52; 95% confidence interval: 1.51 to 1.54), respectively. There was no evidence of a nadir to a baseline BP of 110/70 mm Hg. The strength of the association per 20 mm Hg higher SBP declined with age and with increasing body mass index. Estimates were similar even after excluding individuals prescribed antihypertensive or lipid-lowering therapies. Systematic review identified 30 studies with 285,664 participants and 17,388 incident diabetes events. The pooled relative risk of diabetes for a 20 mm Hg higher usual SBP across these studies was 1.77 (1.53 to 2.05).

CONCLUSIONS

People with elevated BP are at increased risk of diabetes. The strength of the association declined with increasing body mass index and age. Further research should determine if the observed risk is modifiable.

摘要

背景

目前缺乏对血压(BP)与2型糖尿病风险之间关联的可靠量化研究。

目的

本研究旨在确定一般血压与糖尿病风险之间的总体关联以及按参与者特征划分的关联。

方法

利用经过验证的关联电子健康记录,确定了一个由410万无糖尿病和心血管疾病的成年人组成的队列。通过对前瞻性研究的荟萃分析对结果进行补充,这些前瞻性研究报告了每单位收缩压(SBP)新发糖尿病的相对风险。

结果

在整个队列中,收缩压每升高20 mmHg和舒张压每升高10 mmHg分别与新发糖尿病风险增加58%和52%相关(风险比:1.58;95%置信区间[CI]:1.56至1.59;风险比:1.52;95%置信区间:1.51至1.54)。没有证据表明血压最低点为110/70 mmHg。收缩压每升高20 mmHg的关联强度随年龄和体重指数的增加而下降。即使排除接受抗高血压或降脂治疗的个体,估计结果仍相似。系统评价确定了30项研究,涉及285,664名参与者和17,388例糖尿病发病事件。在这些研究中,通常收缩压每升高20 mmHg,糖尿病的合并相对风险为1.77(1.53至2.05)。

结论

血压升高的人群患糖尿病的风险增加。关联强度随体重指数和年龄的增加而下降。进一步的研究应确定观察到的风险是否可改变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d7/4595710/910a864b7fa7/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d7/4595710/e35e8e2172b7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d7/4595710/a8c714c6c4fd/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d7/4595710/68227548d970/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d7/4595710/5df8ac0f9d8e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d7/4595710/910a864b7fa7/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d7/4595710/e35e8e2172b7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d7/4595710/a8c714c6c4fd/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d7/4595710/68227548d970/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d7/4595710/5df8ac0f9d8e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d7/4595710/910a864b7fa7/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Usual Blood Pressure and Risk of New-Onset Diabetes: Evidence From 4.1 Million Adults and a Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.常规血压与新发糖尿病风险:来自410万成年人的证据及前瞻性研究的荟萃分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Oct 6;66(14):1552-1562. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.059.
2
Isolated systolic hypertension in young and middle-aged adults and 31-year risk for cardiovascular mortality: the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry study.中青年单纯收缩期高血压与心血管疾病死亡的31年风险:芝加哥心脏协会工业检测项目研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 3;65(4):327-335. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.060.
3
Target Blood Pressure in Patients with Diabetes: Asian Perspective.糖尿病患者的目标血压:亚洲视角
Yonsei Med J. 2016 Nov;57(6):1307-11. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.6.1307.
4
Multi-morbidity and blood pressure trajectories in hypertensive patients: A multiple landmark cohort study.高血压患者的多病共存和血压轨迹:一项多次定标队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2021 Jun 17;18(6):e1003674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003674. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Circadian pattern of ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients with and without type 2 diabetes.伴有和不伴有 2 型糖尿病的高血压患者的动态血压昼夜节律。
Chronobiol Int. 2013 Mar;30(1-2):99-115. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2012.701489. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
6
Effects of blood-pressure-lowering treatment on outcome incidence in hypertension: 10 - Should blood pressure management differ in hypertensive patients with and without diabetes mellitus? Overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials.降压治疗对高血压患者结局发生率的影响:10 - 糖尿病合并与未合并高血压患者的血压管理是否应有所不同?随机试验的综述与荟萃分析
J Hypertens. 2017 May;35(5):922-944. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001276.
7
Elevated blood pressure and risk of mitral regurgitation: A longitudinal cohort study of 5.5 million United Kingdom adults.血压升高与二尖瓣反流风险:对550万英国成年人的纵向队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 17;14(10):e1002404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002404. eCollection 2017 Oct.
8
Evidence to Maintain the Systolic Blood Pressure Treatment Threshold at 140 mm Hg for Stroke Prevention: The Northern Manhattan Study.维持收缩压治疗阈值为140 mmHg以预防卒中的证据:北曼哈顿研究
Hypertension. 2016 Mar;67(3):520-6. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06857. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
9
Blunted sleep-time relative blood pressure decline increases cardiovascular risk independent of blood pressure level--the "normotensive non-dipper" paradox.非杓型血压的睡眠时间相对血压下降变钝增加心血管风险,而不依赖于血压水平——“正常血压非杓型”悖论。
Chronobiol Int. 2013 Mar;30(1-2):87-98. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2012.701127. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
10
Usual blood pressure, peripheral arterial disease, and vascular risk: cohort study of 4.2 million adults.常规血压、外周动脉疾病与血管风险:420万成年人的队列研究
BMJ. 2015 Sep 29;351:h4865. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4865.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting hypertension prevalence and risk factors: prevalence of hypertension and risk of diabetes in China.重新审视高血压患病率及风险因素:中国的高血压患病率与糖尿病风险
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Aug 2;25(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-05027-6.
2
Interplay between triglyceride-glucose index and cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with controlled blood pressure (SBP<140 mmHg): insights from the SPRINT trial.血压控制良好(收缩压<140 mmHg)的高血压患者中甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与心血管事件的相互作用:来自收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)的见解
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 16;16:1508667. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1508667. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Within-person variability in calculated risk factors: comparing the aetiological association of adiposity ratios with risk of coronary heart disease.个体内风险因素的变异性:比较肥胖率与冠心病发病风险的病因关联。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;42(3):849-59. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt077.
2
Completeness and diagnostic validity of recording acute myocardial infarction events in primary care, hospital care, disease registry, and national mortality records: cohort study.在初级保健、医院护理、疾病登记处和国家死亡率记录中记录急性心肌梗死事件的完整性和诊断准确性:队列研究。
BMJ. 2013 May 20;346:f2350. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2350.
3
All-cause and cardiovascular mortality in middle-aged people with type 2 diabetes compared with people without diabetes in a large U.K. primary care database.
Incidence and predictors of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a population-based cohort study in Abu Dhabi.
在阿布扎比一项基于人群的队列研究中2型糖尿病的发病率及预测因素
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07631-0.
4
Isolated diastolic hypertension and incident cardio-renal-metabolic multimorbidity in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study: comparison of ACC/AHA and ESC/NICE guideline definitions.德黑兰血脂与血糖研究中的单纯舒张期高血压与新发心肾代谢多重疾病:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会与欧洲心脏病学会/英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所指南定义的比较
Hypertens Res. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02267-z.
5
Dietary protein and risk of type 2 diabetes: findings from a registry-based cohort study and a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.膳食蛋白质与2型糖尿病风险:基于登记处的队列研究及前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析结果
Nutr Diabetes. 2025 Jun 3;15(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41387-025-00380-z.
6
Reducing the Risk of Developing Diabetes: The Role of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Patients With Hypertension Combined Prediabetes.降低患糖尿病风险:血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在高血压合并糖尿病前期患者中的作用
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 May;27(5):e70025. doi: 10.1111/jch.70025.
7
Distinct pathway-based effects of blood pressure and body mass index on cardiovascular traits: comparison of novel Mendelian randomization approaches.血压和体重指数对心血管特征的基于不同通路的影响:新型孟德尔随机化方法的比较
Genome Med. 2025 May 15;17(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13073-025-01472-2.
8
Emerging antihypertensive therapies and cardiovascular, kidney, and metabolic outcomes: a Mendelian randomization study.新兴降压疗法与心血管、肾脏及代谢结局:一项孟德尔随机化研究
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 May 2;11(3):264-274. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf015.
9
Classification and identification of risk factors for type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病风险因素的分类与识别
World J Diabetes. 2025 Feb 15;16(2):100371. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i2.100371.
10
Cinnamic acid alleviates endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress by targeting PPARδ in obesity and diabetes.肉桂酸通过靶向肥胖和糖尿病中的PPARδ来减轻内皮功能障碍和氧化应激。
Chin Med. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13020-025-01064-7.
在英国大型初级保健数据库中,与非糖尿病患者相比,中年 2 型糖尿病患者的全因和心血管死亡率。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Aug;36(8):2366-71. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1513. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
4
Cardiovascular benefits and diabetes risks of statin therapy in primary prevention: an analysis from the JUPITER trial.在初级预防中,他汀类药物治疗的心血管获益和糖尿病风险:来自 JUPITER 试验的分析。
Lancet. 2012 Aug 11;380(9841):565-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61190-8.
5
Estimating the current and future costs of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs.估算英国 1 型和 2 型糖尿病的当前和未来成本,包括直接健康成本以及间接的社会和生产力成本。
Diabet Med. 2012 Jul;29(7):855-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03698.x.
6
The interleukin-6 receptor as a target for prevention of coronary heart disease: a mendelian randomisation analysis.白细胞介素-6 受体作为预防冠心病的靶点:一项孟德尔随机分析。
Lancet. 2012 Mar 31;379(9822):1214-24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60110-X. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
7
IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030.国际糖尿病联盟糖尿病地图集:2011 年和 2030 年全球糖尿病患病率估计。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;94(3):311-21. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.029. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
8
Inflammation and hypertension: the interplay of interleukin-6, dietary sodium, and the renin-angiotensin system in humans.炎症与高血压:白细胞介素-6、膳食钠和肾素-血管紧张素系统在人类中的相互作用。
Am J Hypertens. 2011 Oct;24(10):1143-8. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2011.113. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
9
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies.糖尿病、空腹血糖浓度与血管疾病风险:102 项前瞻性研究的协作荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2010 Jun 26;375(9733):2215-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9.
10
Effect of valsartan on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events.缬沙坦对糖尿病和心血管事件发生的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1477-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001121. Epub 2010 Mar 14.