School of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning and IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Aug 1;122(2):809-822. doi: 10.1152/jn.00246.2019. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
Neurotechnological innovations allow for simultaneous recording at various scales, ranging from spiking activity of individual neurons to large neural populations' local field potentials (LFPs). This capability necessitates developing multiscale analysis of spike-field activity. A joint analysis of the hybrid neural data is crucial for bridging the scales between single neurons and local networks. Granger causality is a fundamental measure to evaluate directional influences among neural signals. However, it is mainly limited to inferring causal influence between the same type of signals-either LFPs or spike trains-and not well developed between two different signal types. Here we propose a model-free, nonparametric spike-field Granger causality measure for hybrid data analysis. Our measure is distinct from existing methods in that we use "binless" spikes (precise spike timing) rather than "binned" spikes (spike counts within small consecutive time windows). The latter clearly distort the information in the mixed analysis of spikes and LFP. Therefore, our spectral estimate of spike trains is directly applied to the neural point process itself, i.e., sequences of spike times rather than spike counts. Our measure is validated by an extensive set of simulated data. When the measure is applied to LFPs and spiking activity simultaneously recorded from visual areas V1 and V4 of monkeys performing a contour detection task, we are able to confirm computationally the long-standing experimental finding of the input-output relationship between LFPs and spikes. Importantly, we demonstrate that spike-field Granger causality can be used to reveal the modulatory effects that are inaccessible by traditional methods, such that spike→LFP Granger causality is modulated by the behavioral task, whereas LFP→spike Granger causality is mainly related to the average synaptic input. It is a pressing question to study the directional interactions between local field potential (LFP) and spiking activity. In this report, we propose a model-free, nonparametric spike-field Granger causality measure that can be used to reveal directional influences between spikes and LFPs. This new measure is crucial for bridging the scales between single neurons and neural networks; hence it represents an important step to explicate how the brain orchestrates information processing.
神经技术创新允许在各种尺度上进行同时记录,从单个神经元的尖峰活动到大量神经元群体的局部场电位 (LFP)。这种能力需要开发尖峰-场活动的多尺度分析。混合神经数据的联合分析对于在单个神经元和局部网络之间的尺度之间架起桥梁至关重要。格兰杰因果关系是评估神经信号之间定向影响的基本度量。然而,它主要限于推断同一类型的信号(LFP 或尖峰序列)之间的因果影响,而在两种不同信号类型之间的发展还不够完善。在这里,我们提出了一种用于混合数据分析的无模型、非参数尖峰-场格兰杰因果关系度量。我们的度量方法与现有方法的区别在于,我们使用“无 bin (binless)”尖峰(精确的尖峰时间)而不是“bin 化(binned)”尖峰(小连续时间窗口内的尖峰计数)。后者显然会扭曲混合分析中尖峰和 LFP 的信息。因此,我们对尖峰序列的谱估计直接应用于神经点过程本身,即尖峰时间序列而不是尖峰计数。我们的度量方法通过广泛的模拟数据进行了验证。当该度量方法同时应用于视觉区域 V1 和 V4 中猴子执行轮廓检测任务时记录的 LFP 和尖峰活动时,我们能够通过计算确认长期存在的实验发现,即 LFP 和尖峰之间的输入-输出关系。重要的是,我们证明了尖峰-场格兰杰因果关系可用于揭示传统方法无法揭示的调制效应,使得尖峰→LFP 格兰杰因果关系受到行为任务的调制,而 LFP→尖峰格兰杰因果关系主要与平均突触输入有关。研究局部场电位 (LFP) 和尖峰活动之间的方向相互作用是一个紧迫的问题。在本报告中,我们提出了一种无模型、非参数的尖峰-场格兰杰因果关系度量方法,可用于揭示尖峰和 LFP 之间的方向影响。这种新的度量方法对于在单个神经元和神经网络之间的尺度之间架起桥梁至关重要;因此,它代表了阐明大脑如何协调信息处理的重要一步。