• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新的儿科糖尿病知识测试——M-WIKAD的开发与因素分析

A New Paediatric Diabetes Knowledge Test - M-WIKAD Development and Factor Analysis.

作者信息

Tsai Sarah, Patton Susana, DeLurgio Stephen, Williams David D, Dileepan Kavitha, Karmazin Alexander, Storm Melinda, Clements Mark

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.

University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.

出版信息

Eur Endocrinol. 2019 Apr;15(1):1-5. doi: 10.17925/EE.2019.15.1.1. Epub 2019 Apr 12.

DOI:10.17925/EE.2019.15.1.1
PMID:31244902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6587900/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a measure of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) knowledge that is aimed at youth and is based on contemporary management standards. An 88-item test was derived from the American Association of Diabetes Educators 7 Self-Care Behaviors. A multidisciplinary team selected the best 49 items which were piloted in a sample of 119 youths (59 males, aged 12-18, having a mean ± standard deviation glycated haemoglobin (A1C) of 9.9%±1.80 (84.7±19.7 mmol/mol). A minimum absolute point-biserial correlation coefficient of 0.250 was used to choose 49 items from the original 88 questions. Categorical principal component analysis was then used to identify the best factor analytical model that consisted of five factors composed of 19 items. These five factors explained 57% of item variances. Factors were associated with the latent variables: advanced problem-solving, hypoglycaemia prevention and management, taking insulin/medication administration, daily management and healthy active living. A new T1D knowledge test for youth was refined from 88 to 49 questions based on expert opinion and empirical test construction. The instrument was then refined to 19 items based on exploratory factor analysis. Future goals are to validate this factor model with another cohort and confirm concurrent validity based on youth's glycated haemoglobin and adherence behaviours. Our new T1DM knowledge measure initially appears valid and promising as a new clinical and research tool.

摘要

本研究的目的是开发一种针对青少年的1型糖尿病(T1DM)知识测量方法,该方法基于当代管理标准。一个88项的测试源自美国糖尿病教育者协会的7种自我护理行为。一个多学科团队从这88项中选出了最佳的49项,并在119名青少年样本中进行了试点(59名男性,年龄在12 - 18岁之间,糖化血红蛋白(A1C)的平均值±标准差为9.9%±1.80(84.7±19.7 mmol/mol))。使用最小绝对点二列相关系数0.250从最初的88个问题中选择49项。然后使用分类主成分分析来确定最佳的因子分析模型,该模型由五个因子组成,包含19个项目。这五个因子解释了57%的项目方差。这些因子与潜在变量相关:高级问题解决、低血糖预防与管理、胰岛素/药物服用、日常管理以及健康积极的生活方式。基于专家意见和实证测试构建,针对青少年的新的T1D知识测试从88个问题精简到了49个问题。然后基于探索性因子分析将该工具进一步精简为19个项目。未来的目标是用另一个队列验证这个因子模型,并基于青少年的糖化血红蛋白和依从行为确认同时效度。我们新的T1DM知识测量方法初步看来是有效的,并且作为一种新的临床和研究工具很有前景。

相似文献

1
A New Paediatric Diabetes Knowledge Test - M-WIKAD Development and Factor Analysis.一种新的儿科糖尿病知识测试——M-WIKAD的开发与因素分析
Eur Endocrinol. 2019 Apr;15(1):1-5. doi: 10.17925/EE.2019.15.1.1. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
2
The effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin pumps with continuous glucose monitoring in outpatient adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review.持续皮下胰岛素泵联合持续血糖监测在门诊1型糖尿病青少年患者中的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-10. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-170.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Mealtime Insulin BOLUS Score More Strongly Predicts HbA1c Than the Self-Care Inventory in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.与自我护理量表相比,进餐时胰岛素大剂量评分能更有力地预测1型糖尿病青少年的糖化血红蛋白水平。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Mar;19(2):340-344. doi: 10.1177/19322968231192979. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
5
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
6
The clinical usefulness of glucated haemoglobin in diabetes care evaluated by use of a medical technology assessment strategy.通过使用医疗技术评估策略评估糖化血红蛋白在糖尿病护理中的临床实用性。
Dan Med Bull. 1997 Jun;44(3):303-15.
7
Validation of an instrument to measure adherence to type 2 diabetes management.验证一种用于测量 2 型糖尿病管理依从性的工具。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Jun;43(3):595-603. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01168-0. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
8
Diabetes technology and treatments in the paediatric age group.儿科年龄组的糖尿病技术与治疗
Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2011 Feb(170):76-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02582.x.
9
Development of the ASK-20 adherence barrier survey.ASK-20依从性障碍调查问卷的编制
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Jul;24(7):2127-38. doi: 10.1185/03007990802174769. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
10
Character Strengths Use in Diabetes Self-management Scale: Development and psychometric testing.《性格优势在糖尿病自我管理中的应用量表》:编制与心理测量学检验。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Oct;79(10):4034-4043. doi: 10.1111/jan.15723. Epub 2023 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Long-Term Knowledge Retention in Children with Type 1 Diabetes and Their Families: A Pilot Study.1型糖尿病患儿及其家庭长期知识保留情况的评估:一项试点研究。
Children (Basel). 2025 Aug 1;12(8):1016. doi: 10.3390/children12081016.
2
Modified e-Delphi Process for the Selection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Children and Families With Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitors: Delphi Study.使用持续葡萄糖监测仪为1型糖尿病儿童及家庭选择患者报告结局指标的改良电子德尔菲法:德尔菲研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2022 Nov 30;7(4):e38660. doi: 10.2196/38660.

本文引用的文献

1
12. Children and Adolescents: .12. 儿童和青少年: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S126-S136. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S012.
2
Reflections on Incorporating a Behavioral Intervention into a Busy Pediatric Subspecialty Clinic.
J Pediatr Health Care. 2017 May-Jun;31(3):404-408. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
3
Validation of the Revised Brief Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT2).修订版简明糖尿病知识测试(DKT2)的验证
Diabetes Educ. 2016 Apr;42(2):178-87. doi: 10.1177/0145721715624968. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
4
Diabetes knowledge in young adults: associations with hemoglobin A1C.年轻成年人的糖尿病知识:与糖化血红蛋白的关联
Fam Syst Health. 2015 Mar;33(1):28-35. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000101. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
5
Development and validation of the diabetes knowledge assessment test for use in medical rehabilitation.用于医学康复的糖尿病知识评估测试的开发与验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(9):802-11. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.940427. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
6
Assessment of a short diabetes knowledge instrument for older and minority adults.针对老年人及少数族裔成年人的简短糖尿病知识测评工具评估。
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Jan-Feb;40(1):68-76. doi: 10.1177/0145721713508824. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
7
Clinical utility of a brief screen for health literacy and numeracy among adults with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病成人健康素养和算术能力简短筛查的临床效用
Fam Med. 2013 Jun;45(6):417-23.
8
Development and validation of the type 1 diabetes nutrition knowledge survey.1 型糖尿病营养知识调查问卷的编制与验证。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Aug;35(8):1643-7. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2371. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
9
A dietary behaviors measure for use with low-income, Spanish-speaking Caribbean Latinos with type 2 diabetes: the Latino Dietary Behaviors Questionnaire.一种用于患有2型糖尿病的低收入、讲西班牙语的加勒比拉丁裔人群的饮食行为测量工具:拉丁裔饮食行为问卷。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Apr;111(4):589-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.01.015.
10
Understanding information and education gaps among people with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative investigation.了解 1 型糖尿病患者的信息和教育差距:一项定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Apr;83(1):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 May 31.