Suppr超能文献

修订版简明糖尿病知识测试(DKT2)的验证

Validation of the Revised Brief Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT2).

作者信息

Fitzgerald James T, Funnell Martha M, Anderson Robert M, Nwankwo Robin, Stansfield R Brent, Piatt Grecthen A

机构信息

Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor VA Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Prof Fitzgerald)

Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Mrs Funnell, Dr Anderson, Ms Nwankwo, Dr Stansfield, Dr Piatt).

出版信息

Diabetes Educ. 2016 Apr;42(2):178-87. doi: 10.1177/0145721715624968. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to examine the reliability and validity of the revised Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT2). The original test was updated to reflect current diabetes care and education guidelines. The test has 2 components: a 14-item general test and a 9-item insulin use subscale.

METHODS

Two samples were used to evaluate the DKT2. The first came from an online survey company (Qualtrics, LCC) (n = 101) and the second from University of Michigan's (UofM) Diabetes Registry (n = 89). Cronbach's coefficient alpha was used to calculate reliability. To examine validity, comparisons by type of diabetes, insulin use and oral medication use, and educational level were completed. Correlations between diabetes duration and both the general test and insulin subscale were calculated for the UofM sample.

RESULTS

The two samples differed demographically. While the reliabilities between the samples were disparate, when combined, the coefficient alphas demonstrated reliability for both the general test (.77) and the insulin use subscale (.84). The validation comparisons proved to be similar; different results occurred between samples but when combined demonstrated validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The reliability and validity tests were inconsistent by sample. The different results can, in part, be attributed to the demographic differences between the 2 samples. With the exception of age, the samples differed in every other measured variable. However, when the samples were combined, the analyses supported the reliability and validity of the Diabetes Knowledge Test 2. The DKT2 is a quick and low-cost method of assessing general knowledge of diabetes and diabetes self-care.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验修订后的糖尿病知识测试(DKT2)的信度和效度。原始测试已更新,以反映当前的糖尿病护理和教育指南。该测试有两个部分:一个包含14个条目的一般测试和一个包含9个条目的胰岛素使用分量表。

方法

使用两个样本对DKT2进行评估。第一个样本来自一家在线调查公司(Qualtrics,LCC)(n = 101),第二个样本来自密歇根大学(UofM)的糖尿病登记处(n = 89)。使用克朗巴哈系数α计算信度。为检验效度,完成了按糖尿病类型、胰岛素使用和口服药物使用以及教育水平进行的比较。针对UofM样本计算了糖尿病病程与一般测试和胰岛素分量表之间的相关性。

结果

两个样本在人口统计学上存在差异。虽然样本之间的信度不同,但合并后,系数α显示一般测试(.77)和胰岛素使用分量表(.84)均具有信度。验证比较结果相似;样本之间出现了不同结果,但合并后显示出效度。

结论

信度和效度测试因样本而异。不同结果部分可归因于两个样本之间的人口统计学差异。除年龄外,样本在其他所有测量变量上均存在差异。然而,当样本合并时,分析结果支持糖尿病知识测试2的信度和效度。DKT2是一种快速且低成本的评估糖尿病一般知识和糖尿病自我护理的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验