• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有防治 活性的新型卵菌纲杀菌剂及其在加利福尼亚鳄梨根腐病防治中的应用潜力。

New Oomycota Fungicides With Activity Against and Their Potential Use for Managing Avocado Root Rot in California.

机构信息

1Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.

2Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.

出版信息

Plant Dis. 2019 Aug;103(8):2024-2032. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-18-1698-RE. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1094/PDIS-09-18-1698-RE
PMID:31246147
Abstract

Phytophthora root rot (PRR), caused by , is the most destructive disease of avocado worldwide. In the United States, mefenoxam and phosphonate products are currently the only registered fungicides for managing avocado PRR. Four new Oomycota-specific and two registered fungicides, all with different modes of action, were evaluated. Seventy-one isolates of from avocado in California, most of them collected between 2009 to 2017, were tested for their in vitro sensitivity to the six fungicides. Baseline sensitivity ranges and mean values (in parentheses) of effective concentrations to inhibit mycelial growth by 50% (EC) for the new fungicides ethaboxam, fluopicolide, mandipropamid, and oxathiapiprolin were 0.017 to 0.069 μg/ml (0.035), 0.046 to 0.330 μg/ml (0.133), 0.003 to 0.011 μg/ml (0.005), and 0.0002 to 0.0007 μg/ml (0.0004), respectively. In comparison, the EC value range (mean) was 0.023 to 0.138 μg/ml (0.061) for mefenoxam and 12.9 to 361.2 μg/ml (81.5) for potassium phosphite. Greenhouse soil inoculation trials with 8-month-old Zutano seedlings and 10-month-old Dusa and PS.54 clonal rootstocks were conducted to assess the efficacy of these fungicides for managing PRR. Mefenoxam and potassium phosphite were effective treatments; however, oxathiapiprolin, fluopicolide, and mandipropamid were more effective. Ethaboxam was effective in reducing PRR on the rootstocks evaluated. Oxathiapiprolin reduced PRR incidence and pathogen population size in the soil by >90%, and plant shoot growth and root dry weight were significantly increased compared with the control; thus, oxathiapiprolin was one of the best treatments overall. The high activity and performance of these new fungicides supports their registrations on avocado for use in rotation and mixture programs, including with previously registered compounds, to reduce the risk of development and spread of resistance in pathogen populations.

摘要

疫霉根腐病(PRR)由 引起,是全世界鳄梨最具破坏性的疾病。在美国,目前只有灭蝇胺和膦酸盐产品被注册用于防治鳄梨 PRR。本研究评估了四种新的卵菌纲特异性杀菌剂和两种已注册杀菌剂,它们都具有不同的作用模式。对加利福尼亚州鳄梨中采集的 71 个分离物(大多数收集于 2009 年至 2017 年之间)进行了体外敏感性测试,以评估这六种杀菌剂的敏感性。新杀菌剂乙肟威、氟吡菌酰胺、双丙环虫酯和唑醚·噻唑膦的有效浓度抑制 50%菌丝生长的基线敏感性范围和平均值(括号内)分别为 0.017 至 0.069μg/ml(0.035)、0.046 至 0.330μg/ml(0.133)、0.003 至 0.011μg/ml(0.005)和 0.0002 至 0.0007μg/ml(0.0004)。相比之下,灭蝇胺的 EC 值范围(平均值)为 0.023 至 0.138μg/ml(0.061),而亚磷酸钾的 EC 值为 12.9 至 361.2μg/ml(81.5)。用 8 个月大的 Zutano 实生苗和 10 个月大的 Dusa 和 PS.54 无性系砧木进行温室土壤接种试验,以评估这些杀菌剂防治 PRR 的效果。灭蝇胺和亚磷酸钾是有效的处理方法;然而,唑醚·噻唑膦、氟吡菌酰胺和双丙环虫酯的效果更好。乙肟威在评估的砧木上可有效减轻 PRR。唑醚·噻唑膦可将 PRR 的发病率和土壤中病原菌的种群规模减少 90%以上,与对照相比,植物地上部分生长和根干重显著增加;因此,唑醚·噻唑膦是整体上最好的处理方法之一。这些新杀菌剂的高活性和性能支持它们在鳄梨上的注册,用于轮作和混配方案,包括与以前注册的化合物一起使用,以降低病原菌种群中抗药性发展和传播的风险。

相似文献

1
New Oomycota Fungicides With Activity Against and Their Potential Use for Managing Avocado Root Rot in California.具有防治 活性的新型卵菌纲杀菌剂及其在加利福尼亚鳄梨根腐病防治中的应用潜力。
Plant Dis. 2019 Aug;103(8):2024-2032. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-18-1698-RE. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
Evaluation of New Oomycota Fungicides for Management of Phytophthora Root Rot of Citrus in California.加利福尼亚州新型卵菌纲杀菌剂防治柑橘根腐病的评价。
Plant Dis. 2019 Apr;103(4):619-628. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-18-1152-RE. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
3
Baseline Sensitivities of New Fungicides and Their Toxicity to Selected Life Stages of Phytophthora Species from Citrus in California.加利福尼亚州柑橘上的新杀菌剂及其对某些疫霉菌生活阶段的基线敏感性和毒性。
Plant Dis. 2018 Apr;102(4):734-742. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-17-1155-RE. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
4
Phenotypic Characterization of Genetically Distinct Phytophthora cinnamomi Isolates from Avocado.从鳄梨中分离出的具有不同遗传特征的胶孢炭疽菌的表型特征。
Phytopathology. 2019 Mar;109(3):384-394. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-09-17-0326-R. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
5
Root Absorption and Limited Mobility of Mandipropamid as Compared to Oxathiapiprolin and Mefenoxam After Soil Treatment of Citrus Plants for Managing Phytophthora Root Rot.在对柑橘类植物进行土壤处理以防治疫霉根腐病后,与恶唑菌酮和甲霜灵相比,霜霉威的根部吸收和移动性有限。
Plant Dis. 2023 Apr;107(4):1107-1114. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-22-1699-RE. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
6
Regional Comparisons of Sensitivities of and Causing Citrus Brown Rot in California to Four New and Two Older Fungicides.加利福尼亚地区四种新型和两种旧杀菌剂对 和 引起的柑橘褐腐病敏感性的比较。
Plant Dis. 2024 Jun;108(6):1582-1590. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-23-1556-RE. Epub 2024 May 20.
7
Sensitivity of Phytophthora nicotianae From Tobacco to Fluopicolide, Mandipropamid, and Oxathiapiprolin.烟草疫霉对氟吡菌酰胺、双炔酰菌胺和恶唑菌酰胺的敏感性
Plant Dis. 2016 Oct;100(10):2119-2125. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-16-0429-RE. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
8
Sensitivity of from Tennessee to Mefenoxam, Fluopicolide, Oxathiapiprolin, Dimethomorph, Mandipropamid, and Cyazofamid.田纳西州对甲呋酰胺、氟吡菌胺、唑菌酯、代森锰锌、烯酰吗啉和氰霜唑的敏感性。
Plant Dis. 2021 Oct;105(10):3000-3007. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-20-1805-RE. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
9
Sensitivity of in Tennessee and North Carolina to Mefenoxam, Oxathiapiprolin, Mandipropamid, and Fluopicolide.田纳西州和北卡罗来纳州对甲呋酰胺、唑菌胺酯、双炔酰菌胺和氟吡菌酰胺的敏感性。
Plant Dis. 2024 Jun;108(6):1612-1620. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-23-0632-RE. Epub 2024 May 20.
10
Antifungal activity of avocado rhizobacteria against Fusarium euwallaceae and Graphium spp., associated with Euwallacea spp. nr. fornicatus, and Phytophthora cinnamomi.鳄梨根际细菌对与新菠萝灰粉蚧近似种Euwallacea spp. nr. fornicatus相关的尖孢镰刀菌和拟盘多毛孢属真菌以及樟疫霉的抗真菌活性。
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2018 Apr;111(4):563-572. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0977-5. Epub 2017 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Bacterial community shifts in -induced avocado root rot and the antagonistic potential of NB92.诱导鳄梨根腐病中细菌群落的变化以及NB92的拮抗潜力。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1626537. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1626537. eCollection 2025.
2
Genomic and transcriptomic analyses of reveal complex genome architecture, expansion of pathogenicity factors, and host-dependent gene expression profiles.对……的基因组和转录组分析揭示了复杂的基因组结构、致病因子的扩展以及宿主依赖性基因表达谱。 需注意,原文中“of”后面缺少具体所指内容,翻译时补充了“……”来表示这一缺失部分。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Aug 15;15:1341803. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1341803. eCollection 2024.
3
Potential anti- therapeutics identified through screening of agricultural fungicides.
通过筛选农业杀菌剂发现的潜在治疗药物。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Feb 6;12(2):e0162023. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01620-23. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
4
Fluopicolide-Induced Oxidative Stress and DNA Damage in the Earthworm .氟吡菌酰胺对蚯蚓的氧化应激及DNA损伤作用
Toxics. 2023 Sep 25;11(10):808. doi: 10.3390/toxics11100808.
5
Isolation of two triterpenoids from , one of them with anti-oomycete activity against , and insights into its biosynthetic pathway.从[具体来源未给出]中分离出两种三萜类化合物,其中一种对[具体对象未给出]具有抗卵菌活性,并对其生物合成途径进行了深入研究。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Aug 25;14:1180808. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1180808. eCollection 2023.
6
Assessing the effectiveness of oxathiapiprolin toward , the causal agent of kauri dieback disease.评估恶唑菌酮对贝壳杉枯梢病病原体的有效性。
FEMS Microbes. 2021 Nov 18;2:xtab016. doi: 10.1093/femsmc/xtab016. eCollection 2021.
7
Selection of an Appropriate In Vitro Susceptibility Test for Assessing Anti- Activity of Potassium Iodide, Triamcinolone Acetonide, Dimethyl Sulfoxide, and Ethanol.选择合适的体外药敏试验以评估碘化钾、曲安奈德、二甲基亚砜和乙醇的抗真菌活性。
J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Oct 24;8(11):1116. doi: 10.3390/jof8111116.
8
Mobility of oxathiapiprolin in and between tomato plants.奥克噻唑啉在番茄植株内和植株间的移动性。
Pest Manag Sci. 2023 Mar;79(3):1102-1112. doi: 10.1002/ps.7280. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
9
A systematic review about biological control of phytopathogenic Phytophthora cinnamomi.关于植物病原性无性型疫霉(Phytophthora cinnamomi)的生物防治的系统综述。
Mol Biol Rep. 2022 Oct;49(10):9947-9962. doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07547-2. Epub 2022 May 18.
10
Changes to the Bacterial Microbiome in the Rhizosphere and Root Endosphere of (Avocado) Treated With Organic Mulch and a Silicate-Based Mulch or Phosphite, and Infested With .用有机覆盖物、基于硅酸盐的覆盖物或亚磷酸盐处理并接种了(某种病菌,原文未明确)的鳄梨根际和根内细菌微生物组的变化
Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 28;13:870900. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.870900. eCollection 2022.