• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种创伤后应激障碍筛查工具在重症监护后应用的比较验证。

Comparative validation of three screening instruments for posttraumatic stress disorder after intensive care.

机构信息

Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Institute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Jena, Germany; Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena, Germany.

Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller-University Jena, Institute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2019 Oct;53:149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.06.016
PMID:31247513
Abstract

PURPOSE

Aim of the present study was to compare the validity of three screening instruments to assess symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after intensive care of sepsis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Participants were recruited within a large multicenter patient cohort study on long-term sequelae of sepsis. Adult patients (n = 83) on average four months after intensive care of (severe) sepsis or septic shock were included (median age 64 years, 60% male). PTSD symptom severity was assessed by three different self-report measures: two versions of the Posttraumatic Stress Scale (PTSS-10; PTSS-14), and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). A clinical PTSD diagnosis was derived by using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5).

RESULTS

Ten patients (12%) were diagnosed with PTSD. PTSS-10, PTSS-14, and PCL-5 revealed good reliability and concurrent validity. PTSS-14 showed the best accuracy in screening patients at risk for PTSD after intensive care with 80% sensitivity and 92% specificity at the recommended cutoff of 40.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to PTSS-10 and PCL-5, PTSS-14 appeared more appropriate for post-ICU PTSD screening when validated against a DSM-5 diagnostic interview.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较三种用于评估脓毒症重症监护后创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的筛查工具的有效性。

材料和方法

参与者是在一项关于脓毒症长期后遗症的大型多中心患者队列研究中招募的。纳入了脓毒症或感染性休克重症监护后平均四个月的成年患者(n=83)(中位年龄 64 岁,60%为男性)。使用三种不同的自我报告量表评估 PTSD 症状严重程度:创伤后应激量表(PTSS-10;PTSS-14)的两个版本,以及 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)。通过使用 DSM-5 临床医生管理 PTSD 量表(CAPS-5)得出临床 PTSD 诊断。

结果

10 名患者(12%)被诊断为 PTSD。PTSS-10、PTSS-14 和 PCL-5 显示出良好的可靠性和同时效度。PTSS-14 在筛查重症监护后 PTSD 风险患者方面具有最佳准确性,在推荐的 40 分截点处具有 80%的敏感性和 92%的特异性。

结论

与 PTSS-10 和 PCL-5 相比,PTSS-14 在与 DSM-5 诊断访谈相比较时,在 ICU 后 PTSD 筛查中似乎更合适。

相似文献

1
Comparative validation of three screening instruments for posttraumatic stress disorder after intensive care.三种创伤后应激障碍筛查工具在重症监护后应用的比较验证。
J Crit Care. 2019 Oct;53:149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
2
A diagnostic questionnaire for childbirth related posttraumatic stress disorder: a validation study.分娩相关创伤后应激障碍的诊断问卷:一项验证研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jul;231(1):134.e1-134.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1229. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
3
Validation of Abbreviated Four- and Eight-Item Versions of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 in a Traumatically Injured Sample.创伤后应激障碍检查表 DSM-5 的四和八项简短版本在创伤性损伤样本中的验证。
J Trauma Stress. 2020 Jun;33(3):218-226. doi: 10.1002/jts.22478. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
4
Validity of the posttraumatic stress disorders (PTSD) checklist in pregnant women.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)检查表在孕妇中的有效性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 12;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1304-4.
5
Use of a screening questionnaire for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) on a sample of UK ICU patients.在一组英国重症监护病房患者样本中使用创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)筛查问卷。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Feb;52(2):202-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01531.x. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
6
The validity of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) as screening instrument with Kurdish and Arab displaced populations living in the Kurdistan region of Iraq.DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)作为筛查工具在生活在伊拉克库尔德地区的库尔德和阿拉伯流离失所者中的有效性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 16;18(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1839-z.
7
Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist and DSM-5 PTSD Symptom Set in a Long-Term Postearthquake Cohort in Armenia.亚美尼亚地震后长期队列中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)检查表和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版PTSD症状集的因子结构及心理测量特性
Assessment. 2015 Oct;22(5):594-606. doi: 10.1177/1073191114555523. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
8
The German version of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): psychometric properties and diagnostic utility.《DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表德语文本版(PCL-5):心理测量学特性和诊断效用》。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1541-6.
9
Detecting PTSD in a traumatically injured population: The diagnostic utility of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5.创伤后应激障碍在创伤人群中的检测:DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表的诊断效用。
Depress Anxiety. 2019 Feb;36(2):170-178. doi: 10.1002/da.22873. Epub 2018 Dec 30.
10
Preliminary validation of the Dutch version of the Posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) after traumatic brain injury in a civilian population.创伤性脑损伤后平民人群中 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)荷兰语版本的初步验证。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 20;15(4):e0231857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231857. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond one-cutoff-fits-all: determining cutoff values for the PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5).超越一刀切:确定《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)的临界值
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2514878. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2514878. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
The diagnostic accuracy of PTSD assessment instruments used in older adults: a systematic review.老年人使用的创伤后应激障碍评估工具的诊断准确性:一项系统综述。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2498191. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2498191. Epub 2025 May 14.
3
Post-sepsis psychiatric disorder: Pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment.
脓毒症后精神障碍:病理生理学、预防与治疗
Neurol Sci. 2024 Jul;45(7):3093-3105. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07409-8. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
4
Post-traumatic stress disorder: a psychiatric disorder requiring urgent attention.创伤后应激障碍:一种需要紧急关注的精神障碍。
Med Rev (2021). 2022 Aug 2;2(3):219-243. doi: 10.1515/mr-2022-0012. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5: A Systematic Review of Existing Psychometric Evidence.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍检查表:对现有心理测量证据的系统评价
Clin Psychol (New York). 2023 Mar;30(1):110-121. doi: 10.1037/cps0000111. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
6
One-Year Multidisciplinary Follow-Up of Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.COVID-19 患者接受有创机械通气后的一年多学科随访。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 May;36(5):1354-1363. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.11.032. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
7
Prevalence and Temporal Trends Analysis of Screening and Diagnostic Instruments in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Text Mining Study.创伤后应激障碍筛查与诊断工具的患病率及时间趋势分析:文本挖掘研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Nov 17;8(11):e33599. doi: 10.2196/33599.
8
One-Year Functional, Cognitive, and Psychological Outcomes Following the Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Prospective Study.2019年冠状病毒病使用体外膜肺氧合后的一年功能、认知和心理结局:一项前瞻性研究
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Sep 10;3(9):e0537. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000537. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
Mid-German Sepsis Cohort (MSC): a prospective observational study of sepsis survivorship.中德脓毒症队列研究(MSC):一项脓毒症存活者的前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 17;11(3):e043352. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043352.
10
Two-months quality of life of COVID-19 invasively ventilated survivors; an Italian single-center study.COVID-19 有创通气幸存者的两个月生活质量:意大利单中心研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Aug;65(7):912-920. doi: 10.1111/aas.13812. Epub 2021 Mar 15.