Suppr超能文献

高密度 EEG 和 MEG 中源成像技术的空间分辨率比较。

Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.

机构信息

Multimodal Functional Imaging Lab, Biomedical Engineering Dpt., McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Multimodal Functional Imaging Lab, Biomedical Engineering Dpt., McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Neurology and Neurosurgery Department, Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), McGill University, Montreal, Canada; San Camillo Hospital IRCCS, Venice, Italy.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 15;157:531-544. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study aims at evaluating and comparing electrical and magnetic distributed source imaging methods applied to high-density Electroencephalography (hdEEG) and Magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. We used resolution matrices to characterize spatial resolution properties of Minimum Norm Estimate (MNE), dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping (dSPM), standardized Low-Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (sLORETA) and coherent Maximum Entropy on the Mean (cMEM, an entropy-based technique). The resolution matrix provides information of the Point Spread Functions (PSF) and of the Crosstalk functions (CT), this latter being also called source leakage, as it reflects the influence of a source on its neighbors.

METHODS

The spatial resolution of the inverse operators was first evaluated theoretically and then with real data acquired using electrical median nerve stimulation on five healthy participants. We evaluated the Dipole Localization Error (DLE) and the Spatial Dispersion (SD) of each PSF and CT map.

RESULTS

cMEM showed the smallest spatial spread (SD) for both PSF and CT maps, whereas localization errors (DLE) were similar for all methods. Whereas cMEM SD values were lower in MEG compared to hdEEG, the other methods slightly favored hdEEG over MEG. In real data, cMEM provided similar localization error and significantly less spatial spread than other methods for both MEG and hdEEG. Whereas both MEG and hdEEG provided very accurate localizations, all the source imaging methods actually performed better in MEG compared to hdEEG according to all evaluation metrics, probably due to the higher signal-to-noise ratio of the data in MEG.

CONCLUSION

Our overall results show that all investigated methods provide similar localization errors, suggesting very accurate localization for both MEG and hdEEG when similar number of sensors are considered for both modalities. Intrinsic properties of source imaging methods as well as their behavior for well-controlled tasks, suggest an overall better performance of cMEM in regards to spatial resolution and spatial leakage for both hdEEG and MEG. This indicates that cMEM would be a good candidate for studying source localization of focal and extended generators as well as functional connectivity studies.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估和比较应用于高密度脑电图(hdEEG)和脑磁图(MEG)数据的电和磁分布式源成像方法。我们使用分辨率矩阵来描述最小范数估计(MNE)、动态统计参数映射(dSPM)、标准化低分辨率电磁层析成像(sLORETA)和基于均值的相干最大熵(cMEM,一种基于熵的技术)的空间分辨率特性。分辨率矩阵提供了点扩散函数(PSF)和串扰函数(CT)的信息,后者也称为源泄漏,因为它反映了源对其邻居的影响。

方法

首先从理论上评估逆算子的空间分辨率,然后使用 5 名健康参与者接受电中值神经刺激采集的真实数据进行评估。我们评估了每个 PSF 和 CT 图的偶极子定位误差(DLE)和空间分散(SD)。

结果

cMEM 显示 PSF 和 CT 图的空间扩展(SD)最小,而所有方法的定位误差(DLE)相似。虽然 cMEM 的 SD 值在 MEG 中比在 hdEEG 中低,但其他方法在 hdEEG 中略优于 MEG。在真实数据中,cMEM 在 MEG 和 hdEEG 中都提供了与其他方法相似的定位误差,并且明显具有更小的空间扩展。虽然 MEG 和 hdEEG 都提供了非常准确的定位,但根据所有评估指标,所有源成像方法在 MEG 中的表现实际上都优于 hdEEG,这可能是由于 MEG 数据的信噪比更高。

结论

我们的总体结果表明,所有研究的方法都提供了相似的定位误差,这表明在考虑两种模态的传感器数量相同时,MEG 和 hdEEG 都具有非常准确的定位。源成像方法的固有特性及其在受控任务中的行为表明,cMEM 在 hdEEG 和 MEG 的空间分辨率和空间泄漏方面具有更好的整体性能。这表明 cMEM 将是研究焦点和扩展发生器源定位以及功能连接研究的良好候选者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验