• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联合疼痛教育策略与物理治疗干预对慢性疼痛患者的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

The impact of combining pain education strategies with physical therapy interventions for patients with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Walsh University; North Canton, OH, USA.

School of Medicine, Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Apr;37(4):461-472. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1633714. Epub 2019 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1080/09593985.2019.1633714
PMID:31250682
Abstract

: Systematic Review with meta-analysis.: Rehabilitation providers have begun to incorporate pain education into their treatment protocols to influence the patient's experience and knowledge to improve their condition. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine if the addition of pain education strategies to physical therapy treatments is beneficial in reducing pain intensity and disability for those with chronic musculoskeletal pain.: A systematic database search was conducted for randomized control trials that investigated the concurrent use of pain education and physical therapy. Standardized methods for article identification, inclusion, and quality appraisal was utilized. Where possible, studies were pooled for meta-analysis, with pain and disability as the primary outcomes.: Fourteen articles were included in this review, of which all fourteen were rated as high quality using the PEDro scale of quality assessment. Meta-analyses were conducted on pain and disability constructs at short term (< 12 weeks) and long-term (≥ 12 weeks) for the studies that allowed for quantitative pooling of effect sizes. Thirteen out of the fourteen included studies demonstrated a decrease in pain and disability with the use of combined interventions. There was a large effect on short-term pain (SMD 0.837), long-term pain (SMD 0.964), and long-term disability (SMD 1.374). A moderate effect on with short-term disability (SMD 0.791).: The results of this systematic review support the conclusion that utilizing pain education strategies in conjunction with interventions provided by physical therapists demonstrates a moderate to large effect sizes on pain and disability constructs but lack pooled statistical significance.

摘要

系统评价与荟萃分析

康复提供者已开始将疼痛教育纳入其治疗方案中,以影响患者的体验和知识,从而改善他们的病情。本系统评价的目的是确定在物理治疗中加入疼痛教育策略是否有益于减轻慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的疼痛强度和残疾程度。

对调查疼痛教育与物理治疗同时使用的随机对照试验进行了系统的数据库搜索。采用了标准化的文章识别、纳入和质量评估方法。在可能的情况下,对研究进行了荟萃分析,以疼痛和残疾为主要结局。

本综述共纳入了 14 篇文章,其中所有 14 篇文章均使用 PEDro 量表进行质量评估,被评为高质量。对允许定量汇总效应大小的研究进行了短期(<12 周)和长期(≥12 周)的疼痛和残疾结构的荟萃分析。在使用联合干预措施的 14 项研究中,有 13 项研究显示疼痛和残疾程度降低。短期疼痛(SMD 0.837)、长期疼痛(SMD 0.964)和长期残疾(SMD 1.374)的效果较大。短期残疾(SMD 0.791)的效果中等。

本系统评价的结果支持以下结论

在物理治疗师提供的干预措施中加入疼痛教育策略,对疼痛和残疾结构有中度到较大的效果,但缺乏汇总的统计学意义。

相似文献

1
The impact of combining pain education strategies with physical therapy interventions for patients with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.联合疼痛教育策略与物理治疗干预对慢性疼痛患者的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Apr;37(4):461-472. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1633714. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
2
Self-Guided Web-Based Pain Education for People With Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于网络的自我导向疼痛教育在肌肉骨骼疼痛人群中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Phys Ther. 2021 Oct 1;101(10). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab167.
3
Is Dry Needling Applied by Physical Therapists Effective for Pain in Musculoskeletal Conditions? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.物理治疗师实施的干针疗法对肌肉骨骼疾病疼痛有效吗?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
Phys Ther. 2021 Mar 3;101(3). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab070.
4
Yoga compared to non-exercise or physical therapy exercise on pain, disability, and quality of life for patients with chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.瑜伽与非运动或物理治疗运动对慢性下腰痛患者疼痛、残疾和生活质量的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 1;15(9):e0238544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238544. eCollection 2020.
5
Effectiveness of Tai Chi for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.太极拳对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛病症的疗效:最新系统评价与荟萃分析
Phys Ther. 2017 Feb 1;97(2):227-238. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20160246.
6
Physical Activity Interventions for Increasing Objectively Measured Physical Activity Levels in Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review.增加慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者客观测量的身体活动水平的体育活动干预措施:一项系统综述。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Dec;68(12):1832-1842. doi: 10.1002/acr.22919.
7
Whole Body Vibration Exercise for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.全身振动运动治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Nov;100(11):2167-2178. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
8
Effect of physical therapy timing on patient-reported outcomes for individuals with acute low back pain: A systematic review with meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.物理治疗时机对急性下背痛患者自我报告结局的影响:一项对随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
PM R. 2023 Nov;15(11):1466-1477. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12984. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
9
The Effectiveness of Trigger Point Dry Needling for Musculoskeletal Conditions by Physical Therapists: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.物理治疗师采用触发点干针治疗肌肉骨骼疾病的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Mar;47(3):133-149. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7096. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
10
Effects of manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture for lateral epicondylalgia of musculoskeletal origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手法针刺和电针对骨骼肌来源的外侧肱骨上髁炎的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acupunct Med. 2021 Oct;39(5):405-422. doi: 10.1177/0964528420967364. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Pain Clinical Specialists' Perspectives on Opioid Optimization for Chronic Non-Malignant Pain in England.探索英国疼痛临床专家对慢性非恶性疼痛阿片类药物优化治疗的看法。
J Pain Res. 2025 Aug 13;18:4037-4051. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S512418. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of a pain education program for people with spinal cord injury who experience neuropathic pain.针对患有神经性疼痛的脊髓损伤患者的疼痛教育项目的影响。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 May 27;6:1569446. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1569446. eCollection 2025.
3
Enablers, Barriers and Practical Applications of a Group-Based Pain Self-Management Program for Patients Receiving Medical Cannabis: A Qualitative Study of Patients and Clinicians.
医用大麻患者基于小组的疼痛自我管理计划的促进因素、障碍及实际应用:一项针对患者和临床医生的定性研究
Pain Pract. 2025 Jun;25(5):e70052. doi: 10.1111/papr.70052.
4
A Cross-Sectional Study on Current Perioperative Pain Management and Nurses' Pain Management Self-Efficacy in China's Interventional Department.中国介入科当前围手术期疼痛管理及护士疼痛管理自我效能的横断面研究
J Pain Res. 2025 Mar 14;18:1291-1303. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S478935. eCollection 2025.
5
Mental and Physical Well-Being of Partners of People Living with Chronic Pain: A Narrative Review.慢性疼痛患者伴侣的身心健康:一项叙述性综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 31;22(2):205. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020205.
6
An update on non-pharmacological interventions for pain relief.疼痛缓解的非药物干预最新进展。
Cell Rep Med. 2025 Feb 18;6(2):101940. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.101940.
7
"How can we help you?": results of a scoping review on the perceived needs of people living with chronic pain regarding physiotherapy.“我们能帮你什么?”:一项关于慢性疼痛患者对物理治疗需求的认知的范围综述的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):1401. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11805-3.
8
Design of a Health Education Program to Manage Chronic Neck Pain: Protocol for a Development Study.设计一个管理慢性颈痛的健康教育计划:发展研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 1;13:e56632. doi: 10.2196/56632.
9
Chronic Pain Management Approaches among Spanish Physiotherapists: Influences, Practices, Barriers, and Challenges.西班牙物理治疗师的慢性疼痛管理方法:影响因素、实践、障碍与挑战
J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 26;14(9):903. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090903.
10
Pain Neuroscience Education and Neuroimaging-A Narrative Review.疼痛神经科学教育与神经影像学——一篇叙述性综述
Brain Sci. 2024 Sep 22;14(9):947. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14090947.