• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于团队的质量改进学习对两个提供痴呆症护理的团队的影响。

Effects of team-based quality improvement learning on two teams providing dementia care.

作者信息

Dixon Nancy, Wellsteed Lorna

机构信息

Strategic Services, Healthcare Quality Quest, Romsey, UK.

Wellsteed Associates, Mortimer, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Apr 24;8(2):e000500. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000500. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000500
PMID:31259282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6567950/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of a structured team-based learning approach to quality improvement (QI) on the performance 12 months later of two teams caring for patients with dementia.

DESIGN

Before and after prospective study.

SETTING

Staff working in two inpatient services in National Health Service Trusts in England, one providing orthopaedic surgery (Team A) and one caring for elderly people with mental health conditions, including dementia (Team B). Team A consisted of nurses; Team B included doctors, nurses, therapists, mental health support workers and administrators.

METHODS

QI training and support, assessment of the performance of teams and team coaching were provided to the two teams. QI training integrated tools for teamworking and a structured approach to QI. Team members completed the Aston Team Performance Inventory, a validated tool for assessing team performance, at the start of the QI work (time 1) and 1 year later (time 2).

RESULTS

A year after the QI training and team QI project, Team A members perceived themselves as a high-performing team, reflected in improvement in 24 of 52 components measured in the Inventory; Team B was initially a poorly performing team and had improvements in 42 of 52 components a year later.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that a structured team-based learning approach to QI has effects a year later on the performance of teams in clinical settings, as measured by a validated team performance tool.

摘要

目的

确定一种基于团队的结构化质量改进方法对两个照顾痴呆患者的团队在12个月后的绩效的影响。

设计

前瞻性前后对照研究。

背景

在英国国民健康服务信托基金的两个住院服务部门工作的员工,一个提供骨科手术(A组),另一个照顾患有精神健康疾病(包括痴呆)的老年人(B组)。A组由护士组成;B组包括医生、护士、治疗师、精神健康支持人员和管理人员。

方法

为两个团队提供质量改进培训和支持、团队绩效评估及团队指导。质量改进培训整合了团队合作工具和一种结构化的质量改进方法。团队成员在质量改进工作开始时(时间1)和1年后(时间2)完成阿斯顿团队绩效量表,这是一种经过验证的评估团队绩效的工具。

结果

在质量改进培训和团队质量改进项目开展一年后,A组成员认为自己是一个高绩效团队,这体现在量表所测量的52个项目中有24个项目得到了改善;B组最初是一个绩效较差的团队,一年后52个项目中有42个项目得到了改善。

结论

本研究表明,一种基于团队的结构化质量改进方法在一年后会对临床环境中团队的绩效产生影响,这是通过一种经过验证的团队绩效工具来衡量的。

相似文献

1
Effects of team-based quality improvement learning on two teams providing dementia care.基于团队的质量改进学习对两个提供痴呆症护理的团队的影响。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Apr 24;8(2):e000500. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000500. eCollection 2019.
2
The role of psychological safety and learning behavior in the development of effective quality improvement teams in Ghana: an observational study.心理安全和学习行为在加纳有效质量改进团队发展中的作用:一项观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4234-7.
3
Factors associated with the impact of quality improvement collaboratives in mental healthcare: an exploratory study.与精神卫生保健中质量改进合作的影响相关的因素:一项探索性研究。
Implement Sci. 2012 Jan 9;7:1. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-1.
4
Implementation of quality improvement skills by primary care teams: case study of a large academic practice.基层医疗团队质量改进技能的实施:大型学术实践案例研究
J Prim Care Community Health. 2014 Apr 1;5(2):101-6. doi: 10.1177/2150131913520601. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
5
Empowering Implementation Teams with a Learning Health System Approach: Leveraging Data to Improve Quality of Care for Transient Ischemic Attack.采用学习型健康系统方法增强实施团队能力:利用数据提高短暂性脑缺血发作的护理质量。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):823-831. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06160-y. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
6
An Interprofessional Quality Improvement Training Program That Improves Educational and Quality Outcomes.一个能改善教育和质量成果的跨专业质量改进培训项目。
Am J Med Qual. 2019 Nov/Dec;34(6):577-584. doi: 10.1177/1062860618825306. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Improved Clinical Performance and Teamwork of Pediatric Interprofessional Resuscitation Teams With a Simulation-Based Educational Intervention.基于模拟的教育干预可提高儿科跨专业复苏团队的临床绩效和团队协作能力。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;18(2):e62-e69. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001025.
9
Contextual factors that influence quality improvement implementation in primary care: The role of organizations, teams, and individuals.影响基层医疗质量改进实施的背景因素:组织、团队和个人的作用。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2018 Jul/Sep;43(3):261-269. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000194.
10
Immediate and long-term effects of a team-based quality improvement training programme.基于团队的质量改进培训计划的即时和长期效果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 May;28(5):366-373. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007894. Epub 2018 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Delphi analysis of how the practice team should organise event analysis in primary care.关于基层医疗实践团队应如何组织事件分析的德尔菲分析。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jul 13;14(3):e003282. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003282.
2
How Hospitalists in Training Are Improving Quality of Patient Care in Dutch Hospitals.荷兰医院中接受培训的住院医师如何提高患者护理质量。
Am J Med Qual. 2025;40(3):122-127. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000229. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
3
Enhancing capability for continuous organisational improvement and learning in healthcare organisations: a systematic review of the literature 2013-2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Team dynamics within quality improvement teams: a scoping review.质量改进团队中的团队动态:一项范围综述
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Jul 1;30(6):416-422. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy045.
2
Building Systemwide Improvement Capability: Does an Organization's Strategy for Quality Improvement Matter?建立全系统改进能力:组织的质量改进战略重要吗?
Qual Manag Health Care. 2016 Apr-Jun;25(2):92-101. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000089.
3
Behaviors of successful interdisciplinary hospital quality improvement teams.成功的跨学科医院质量改进团队的行为。
提升医疗组织持续组织改进和学习的能力:2013-2022 年文献系统综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 2;13(2):e002566. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002566.
4
Effects of a team Quality Improvement method in a national clinical audit programme of four clinical specialties in Ministry of Health hospitals in Saudi Arabia.团队质量改进方法在沙特阿拉伯卫生部医院四个临床专科全国临床审计项目中的效果。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Feb 5;36(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad107.
5
Exploring healthcare staff narratives to understand the role of quality improvement methods in innovative practices during COVID-19.探讨医疗保健人员的叙事,以了解在 COVID-19 期间,质量改进方法在创新实践中的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 25;21(1):1271. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07297-0.
6
How, why and under what circumstances does a quality improvement collaborative build knowledge and skills in clinicians working with people with dementia? A realist informed process evaluation.一个质量改进协作如何、为何以及在何种情况下能在与痴呆症患者合作的临床医生中建立知识和技能?一项基于现实主义的过程评价。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 May;10(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001147.
7
'Team capital' in quality improvement teams: findings from an ethnographic study of front-line quality improvement in the NHS.质量改进团队中的“团队资本”:英国国家医疗服务体系一线质量改进的民族志研究结果。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 May;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000948.
J Hosp Med. 2011 Nov;6(9):501-6. doi: 10.1002/jhm.927. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
4
What is the value and impact of quality and safety teams? A scoping review.质量和安全团队的价值和影响是什么?范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2011 Aug 23;6:97. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-97.
5
Three success factors for continual improvement in healthcare: an analysis of the reports of improvement team members.医疗保健持续改进的三个成功因素:对改进团队成员报告的分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Mar;20(3):251-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2009.038604. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
6
Role of "external facilitation" in implementation of research findings: a qualitative evaluation of facilitation experiences in the Veterans Health Administration.“外部促进”在研究结果实施中的作用:对退伍军人健康管理局促进经验的定性评估。
Implement Sci. 2006 Oct 18;1:23. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-23.
7
Characteristics of successful quality improvement teams: lessons from five collaborative projects in the VHA.成功的质量改进团队的特征:来自退伍军人健康管理局五个合作项目的经验教训。
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004 Mar;30(3):152-62. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(04)30017-1.
8
Learning helpers: how they facilitated improvement and improved facilitation--lessons from a hospital-wide quality improvement initiative.
Qual Manag Health Care. 2004 Jan-Mar;13(1):60-74. doi: 10.1097/00019514-200401000-00006.