• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感到困惑或好奇?开放性/智力预示着更积极的兴趣困惑关系。

Confused or curious? Openness/intellect predicts more positive interest-confusion relations.

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences.

School of Psychology.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Nov;117(5):1016-1033. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000257. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1037/pspp0000257
PMID:31259577
Abstract

Open people show greater interest in situations that are complex, novel, and difficult to understand-situations that may also be experienced as confusing. Here we investigate the possibility that openness/intellect is centrally characterized by more positive relations between interest and confusion. Interest and confusion are key states experienced during engagement with information and learning. However, little is known about the within-person relation between them, let alone individual differences in this relation. We tested our hypotheses by making use of different paradigms, stimuli, and participants. Across five studies ( = 640) we tested the relation between openness/intellect and within-person interest-confusion relations in response to art (Study 1); science, philosophy, and art (Study 2); psychology lectures (Study 3); a poem (Study 4); and a complex problem solving task (Study 5). Average interest-confusion relations varied between different studies, but for all studies the distributions of the relations went from highly negative to highly positive-individual differences in direction rather than just degree. In all but 1 study we found consistent support for our hypotheses-openness/intellect is associated with more positive relations between interest and confusion. No other personality domain or intelligence was consistently related to interest-confusion relations. Together, these findings suggest a new phenomenological aspect of being open-curiosity toward confusing situations. Our findings support the link between openness/intellect and sensitivity to the value of complex information, and are discussed with regards to their relevance for engagement with information and learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

开放的人对复杂、新颖和难以理解的情况更感兴趣——这些情况也可能让人感到困惑。在这里,我们研究了开放性/智力的一个可能性,即兴趣和困惑之间存在更积极的关系。兴趣和困惑是在信息和学习参与过程中经历的关键状态。然而,人们对它们之间的内在关系知之甚少,更不用说这种关系的个体差异了。我们通过利用不同的范式、刺激和参与者来检验我们的假设。在五项研究(n=640)中,我们检验了开放性/智力与对艺术(研究 1)、科学、哲学和艺术(研究 2)、心理学讲座(研究 3)、一首诗(研究 4)和一个复杂问题解决任务(研究 5)的反应中的内在兴趣-困惑关系。不同研究中平均兴趣-困惑关系不同,但对于所有研究,关系的分布从高度负相关到高度正相关——个体差异在于方向而不仅仅是程度。除了一项研究外,我们都一致支持我们的假设——开放性/智力与兴趣和困惑之间更积极的关系有关。没有其他人格领域或智力与兴趣-困惑关系始终相关。这些发现共同表明了开放的一个新的现象学方面——对令人困惑的情况的好奇心。我们的发现支持了开放性/智力与对复杂信息价值的敏感性之间的联系,并就其与信息和学习参与的相关性进行了讨论。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Confused or curious? Openness/intellect predicts more positive interest-confusion relations.感到困惑或好奇?开放性/智力预示着更积极的兴趣困惑关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Nov;117(5):1016-1033. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000257. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
2
Apophenia as the disposition to false positives: A unifying framework for openness and psychoticism.错觉关联倾向作为假阳性倾向:开放性和精神病态的统一框架。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 Apr;129(3):279-292. doi: 10.1037/abn0000504.
3
Openness to Experience and Intellect Differentially Predict Creative Achievement in the Arts and Sciences.对经验和智力的开放性差异预测艺术和科学领域的创造性成就。
J Pers. 2016 Apr;84(2):248-58. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12156. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
4
Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure.审美情感与审美之人:开放性预示着在兴趣和愉悦体验中对新奇事物的敏感度。
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 9;6:1877. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01877. eCollection 2015.
5
Structural correlates of Openness and Intellect: Implications for the contribution of personality to creativity.开放性和智力的结构相关性:对人格对创造力贡献的启示。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jul;39(7):2987-2996. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24054. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
6
Stable individual differences from dynamic patterns of function: brain network flexibility predicts openness/intellect, intelligence, and psychoticism.功能动态模式中的稳定个体差异:脑网络灵活性预测开放性/智力、智商和精神质。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Sep 3;34(9). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae391.
7
Openness to experience, intellect, and cognitive ability.开放性、智力和认知能力。
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(1):46-52. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.806327. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
8
Better Open Than Intellectual: The Benefits of Investment Personality Traits for Learning.开明优于才智:投资人格特质对学习的好处。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Apr;44(4):562-573. doi: 10.1177/0146167217744526. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
9
Surprised-curious-confused: Epistemic emotions and knowledge exploration.惊讶-好奇-困惑:认识情感与知识探索。
Emotion. 2020 Jun;20(4):625-641. doi: 10.1037/emo0000578. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
Why do people seek information? The role of personality traits and situation perception.人们为什么会寻求信息?人格特质和情境感知的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Apr;151(4):934-959. doi: 10.1037/xge0001109. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Shattering the Shield: Embracing Complexity in Undergraduate Medical Education.打破壁垒:本科医学教育中拥抱复杂性
Clin Teach. 2025 Feb;22(1):e70018. doi: 10.1111/tct.70018.
2
Full throttle: Demonstrating the speed, accuracy, and validity of a new method for continuous two-dimensional self-report and annotation.全力推进:展示一种新的连续二维自我报告和注释方法的速度、准确性和有效性。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):350-364. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01616-3. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
3
Dimensions and Clusters of Aesthetic Emotions: A Semantic Profile Analysis.
审美情感的维度与聚类:语义剖析分析
Front Psychol. 2021 May 28;12:667173. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.667173. eCollection 2021.
4
Magic Curiosity Arousing Tricks (MagicCATs): A novel stimulus collection to induce epistemic emotions.魔术好奇心激发技巧(MagicCATs):一种新颖的刺激物集合,可诱发认知情绪。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Feb;53(1):188-215. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01431-2.
5
Surprise, Curiosity, and Confusion Promote Knowledge Exploration: Evidence for Robust Effects of Epistemic Emotions.惊讶、好奇和困惑促进知识探索:认知情绪产生强大影响的证据。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 12;10:2474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02474. eCollection 2019.