• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

审美情感与审美之人:开放性预示着在兴趣和愉悦体验中对新奇事物的敏感度。

Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure.

作者信息

Fayn Kirill, MacCann Carolyn, Tiliopoulos Niko, Silvia Paul J

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW, Australia.

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro NC, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 9;6:1877. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01877. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01877
PMID:26696940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4673303/
Abstract

There is a stable relationship between the Openness/Intellect domain of personality and aesthetic engagement. However, neither of these are simple constructs and while the relationship exists, process based evidence explaining the relationship is still lacking. This research sought to clarify the relationship by evaluating the influence of the Openness and Intellect aspects on several different aesthetic emotions. Two studies looked at the between- and within-person differences in arousal and the emotions of interest, pleasure and confusion in response to visual art. The results suggest that Openness, as opposed to Intellect, was predictive of greater arousal, interest and pleasure, while both aspects explained less confusion. Differences in Openness were associated with within-person emotion appraisal contingencies, particularly greater novelty-interest and novelty-pleasure relationships. Those higher in Openness were particularly influenced by novelty in artworks. For pleasure this relationship suggested a different qualitative structure of appraisals. The appraisal of novelty is part of the experience of pleasure for those high in Openness, but not those low in Openness. This research supports the utility of studying Openness and Intellect as separate aspects of the broad domain and clarifies the relationship between Openness and aesthetic states in terms of within-person appraisal processes.

摘要

人格的开放性/智力领域与审美参与之间存在稳定的关系。然而,这两者都不是简单的结构,虽然这种关系存在,但解释这种关系的基于过程的证据仍然缺乏。本研究旨在通过评估开放性和智力方面对几种不同审美情绪的影响来澄清这种关系。两项研究考察了对视觉艺术的反应中,唤醒以及兴趣、愉悦和困惑情绪在个体间和个体内的差异。结果表明,与智力相反,开放性能够预测更高的唤醒水平、兴趣和愉悦感,而这两个方面对困惑情绪的解释力较小。开放性的差异与个体内情绪评估的偶然性有关,特别是更高的新奇 - 兴趣和新奇 - 愉悦关系。开放性较高的人尤其受到艺术作品中新奇性的影响。对于愉悦感而言,这种关系表明了评估的不同质性结构。对于开放性高的人来说,新奇性的评估是愉悦体验的一部分,但对于开放性低的人则不是。本研究支持将开放性和智力作为广义领域的不同方面进行研究的实用性,并从个体内评估过程的角度阐明了开放性与审美状态之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3184/4673303/bd5bd08ad468/fpsyg-06-01877-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3184/4673303/5993f58226de/fpsyg-06-01877-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3184/4673303/bd5bd08ad468/fpsyg-06-01877-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3184/4673303/5993f58226de/fpsyg-06-01877-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3184/4673303/bd5bd08ad468/fpsyg-06-01877-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure.审美情感与审美之人:开放性预示着在兴趣和愉悦体验中对新奇事物的敏感度。
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 9;6:1877. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01877. eCollection 2015.
2
Nuanced aesthetic emotions: emotion differentiation is related to knowledge of the arts and curiosity.细微的审美情感:情感分化与艺术知识和好奇心有关。
Cogn Emot. 2018 May;32(3):593-599. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1322554. Epub 2017 May 10.
3
Confused or curious? Openness/intellect predicts more positive interest-confusion relations.感到困惑或好奇?开放性/智力预示着更积极的兴趣困惑关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Nov;117(5):1016-1033. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000257. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
4
Openness to Experience and Intellect Differentially Predict Creative Achievement in the Arts and Sciences.对经验和智力的开放性差异预测艺术和科学领域的创造性成就。
J Pers. 2016 Apr;84(2):248-58. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12156. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
5
Characterizing the emotional response to art beyond pleasure: Correspondence between the emotional characteristics of artworks and viewers' emotional responses.刻画超越愉悦感的对艺术的情感反应:艺术作品的情感特征与观者情感反应之间的对应关系。
Prog Brain Res. 2018;237:319-342. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
6
Components of aesthetic experience: aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion.审美体验的组成部分:审美迷恋、审美评价和审美情感。
Iperception. 2012;3(1):1-17. doi: 10.1068/i0450aap. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
7
What are aesthetic emotions?审美情感是什么?
Psychol Rev. 2019 Mar;126(2):171-195. doi: 10.1037/rev0000135.
8
What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest.什么是有趣的?探索兴趣的评价结构。
Emotion. 2005 Mar;5(1):89-102. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.89.
9
Structural correlates of Openness and Intellect: Implications for the contribution of personality to creativity.开放性和智力的结构相关性:对人格对创造力贡献的启示。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jul;39(7):2987-2996. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24054. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
10
Level of attention mediates the association between connectedness to nature and aesthetic evaluations of photographs of nature.注意力水平调节了与自然的连接程度与对自然摄影美学评价之间的关系。
PeerJ. 2023 Mar 16;11:e14926. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14926. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of art engagement in museums and through digital media.博物馆与通过数字媒体进行艺术参与的比较。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 15;15(1):8972. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93630-0.
2
Beyond the words: Exploring individual differences in the evaluation of poetic creativity.超越言语:探索诗歌创造力评价中的个体差异。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 3;19(10):e0307298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307298. eCollection 2024.
3
How material sensory properties and individual differences influence the haptic aesthetic appeal of visually presented stimuli.

本文引用的文献

1
Openness to Experience: its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence.开放性:其较低层次的结构、测量及跨文化等效性。
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(1):29-45. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.806328. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
2
Intellect: a theoretical framework for personality traits related to intellectual achievements.理智:与智力成就相关的人格特质的理论框架。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 May;104(5):885-906. doi: 10.1037/a0031918. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
3
Implicit learning as an ability.内隐学习能力。
物质感官特性和个体差异如何影响视觉呈现刺激的触觉美学吸引力。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 13;14(1):13690. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63925-9.
4
Individual differences in scientists' aesthetic disposition, aesthetic experiences, and aesthetic sensitivity in scientific work.科学家在科学工作中的审美倾向、审美体验和审美敏感性的个体差异。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1197870. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197870. eCollection 2023.
5
Aesthetic Motivation Impacts Judgments of Others' Prosociality and Mental Life.审美动机影响对他人亲社会行为和精神生活的判断。
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Dec 8;7:947-980. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00113. eCollection 2023.
6
Being alive to the world: an artist's perspective on predictive processing.对世界保持敏感:预测加工的艺术家视角。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 29;379(1895):20220429. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0429. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
7
The aesthetic valve: how aesthetic appreciation may switch emotional states from anxiety to curiosity.审美阀:审美欣赏如何将情绪状态从焦虑切换到好奇。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 29;379(1895):20220413. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0413. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
8
Assessing the aesthetic attractivity of European butterflies: A web-based survey protocol.评估欧洲蝴蝶的美学吸引力:一项基于网络的调查方案。
PLoS One. 2023 May 11;18(5):e0283360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283360. eCollection 2023.
9
Feedback beyond accuracy: Using eye-tracking to detect comprehensibility and interest during reading.超越准确性的反馈:利用眼动追踪技术检测阅读过程中的可理解性和兴趣度。
J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2023 Jan;74(1):3-16. doi: 10.1002/asi.24657. Epub 2022 May 24.
10
The impact of contextual information on aesthetic engagement of artworks.语境信息对艺术品审美参与的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 15;13(1):4273. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30768-9.
Cognition. 2010 Sep;116(3):321-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.011. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
4
Beauty and the beholder: highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images.美在观者心中:对抽象图像有着高度个性化的品味,但对现实世界图像则不然。
J Vis. 2010 Feb 22;10(2):18.1-14. doi: 10.1167/10.2.18.
5
Who art thou? Personality predictors of artistic preferences in a large UK sample: the importance of openness.你是谁?英国一个大样本中艺术偏好的人格预测因素:开放性的重要性。
Br J Psychol. 2009 Aug;100(Pt 3):501-16. doi: 10.1348/000712608X366867. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
6
Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five.在层面与领域之间:大五人格的10个方面。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Nov;93(5):880-96. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880.
7
Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue.横断面多层次模型中的预测变量中心化:对一个老问题的新审视。
Psychol Methods. 2007 Jun;12(2):121-38. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121.
8
Must interesting things be pleasant? A test of competing appraisal structures.有趣的事物就一定令人愉悦吗?对相互竞争的评价结构的一项测试。
Emotion. 2006 Nov;6(4):670-4. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.4.670.
9
Aesthetic activities and aesthetic attitudes: influences of education, background and personality on interest and involvement in the arts.审美活动与审美态度:教育、背景和个性对艺术兴趣及参与度的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2006 Nov;97(Pt 4):555-87. doi: 10.1348/000712606X101088.
10
What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest.什么是有趣的?探索兴趣的评价结构。
Emotion. 2005 Mar;5(1):89-102. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.89.