Department of Neurosurgery, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.
Hull York Medical School, University of York, Heslington, UK.
Br J Neurosurg. 2020 Oct;34(5):565-568. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2019.1635989. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
Pineal cysts are common benign incidental findings in adults. There are no commonly accepted criteria for follow up or indications for intervention. We looked at our outcomes for this condition to explore their natural history and review our surveillance criteria. Retrospective review of multidisciplinary team meetings at a tertiary neurosurgical centre over 10 years. Data relating to demographics, presenting symptoms, maximum diameter, duration of surveillance, final diagnosis and overall outcome were extracted from electronic patient records and available MRI. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS version 24. Seventy-seven pineal cysts were identified. Female to male ratio was 1.43, female mean age was 38.6 and male mean age was 50.4. An increase in referral frequency was observed over the study period (mean increase of 1.4 cases per year). Presenting symptoms of headache in 45% and visual and hearing symptoms in 38.5% were recorded and baseline mean maximum diameter was 13.4mm. 20 patients were discharged on presentation, 54 were booked for at least one follow-up scan with a median follow up period of 14 months. The mean change in maximum diameter was 0.04mm over 18 months. Three patients (3.9%) underwent endoscopic biopsy and CSF diversion for cysts all more than 20mm with radiological evidence of hydrocephalus. In 100% of cases, the initial MDT diagnosis and final diagnosis were concordant. No patient under surveillance required surgical treatment and those managed surgically were symptomatic with large cysts and hydrocephalus on presentation. A majority of pineal cysts remained unchanged during the MRI follow-up, therefore our review suggests that routine follow-up of pineal cysts is not necessary in the absence of unusual radiological characteristics or related clinical symptoms.
松果体囊肿是成年人中常见的良性偶然发现。目前尚无普遍接受的随访标准或干预指征。我们研究了这种情况的结果,以探讨其自然病史并审查我们的监测标准。回顾性分析了 10 年间三级神经外科中心多学科团队会议的资料。从电子患者记录和可用的 MRI 中提取了与人口统计学、临床表现、最大直径、监测持续时间、最终诊断和总体结果相关的数据。使用 IBM SPSS 版本 24 进行数据分析。确定了 77 个松果体囊肿。女性与男性的比例为 1.43,女性的平均年龄为 38.6 岁,男性的平均年龄为 50.4 岁。研究期间观察到转诊频率增加(平均每年增加 1.4 例)。记录到 45%的患者有头痛症状,38.5%的患者有视觉和听觉症状,基线平均最大直径为 13.4mm。20 名患者在就诊时出院,54 名患者至少预约了一次随访扫描,中位随访时间为 14 个月。在 18 个月内,最大直径的平均变化为 0.04mm。3 名(3.9%)患者因囊肿大于 20mm 且有脑积水的放射学证据而行内镜活检和 CSF 分流。在 100%的病例中,初始 MDT 诊断和最终诊断是一致的。在监测期间,没有患者需要手术治疗,而接受手术治疗的患者在就诊时均有大囊肿和脑积水的症状。大多数松果体囊肿在 MRI 随访期间保持不变,因此我们的回顾表明,在没有不寻常的放射学特征或相关临床症状的情况下,松果体囊肿不需要常规随访。