Wright I H, McDonald J C, Rogers P N, Ledingham I M
Department of Surgery, Western Infirmary, Glasgow.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Feb 20;296(6621):543-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6621.543.
A survey by questionnaire of 280 hospitals with general intensive care units was carried out to find out what facilities were provided for secondary transport of seriously ill patients in the United Kingdom. Replies were received from 181 units. Extrapolating from the survey data showed that about 10,000 patients were transported each year, although many units transferred only a few patients. An appreciable minority of units reported that facilities for secondary transport were inadequate and many were obliged to send inexperienced medical staff with patients. Almost half of the respondents thought that arrangements for transfer were unsatisfactory, but only a tenth said that they delayed or refused transfer for this reason. This undoubtedly reflects a policy of "making do" despite inadequate resources. We believe that these results support the concept of regional transport services, where each major unit would be adequately equipped and staffed and unnecessary duplication of resources avoided.
我们对280家设有普通重症监护病房的医院进行了问卷调查,以了解英国为重症患者的二次转运提供了哪些设施。共收到181个病房的回复。根据调查数据推断,每年约有10000名患者被转运,不过许多病房只转运少数患者。相当一部分病房报告称二次转运设施不足,许多病房不得不派经验不足的医护人员陪同患者。近一半的受访者认为转运安排不尽人意,但只有十分之一的人表示他们因此延迟或拒绝转运。这无疑反映了在资源不足的情况下“凑合着用”的政策。我们认为这些结果支持区域转运服务的理念,即每个主要病房都应配备充足的设备和人员,并避免资源的不必要重复。