• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低危前列腺癌患者行根治性前列腺切除术后的病理升级:依靠活检病理检查有多安全?

The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer patients who are eligible for active surveillance: How safe is it to depend on bioptic pathology?

机构信息

Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Pathology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Prostate. 2019 Sep;79(13):1523-1529. doi: 10.1002/pros.23873. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1002/pros.23873
PMID:31269285
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Active surveillance (AS) is one of the treatment alternatives in low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy (RP) were investigated in patients who were eligible for AS in the present study.

METHODS

Between August 2006 and July 2017, 627 patients underwent RP in our institution. One hundred and thirty-six patients who were eligible for AS at the time of RP were included in this study. The previously defined AS criteria Gleason 3 + 3=6 adenocarcinoma at maximum two biopsy cores, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/mL and clinical T stage ≤ 2a were used in the study. The demographics, clinical, and histopathological outcomes were retrospectively compared between two groups, which were divided in accordance with the upgrading status at final pathology as Group 1 (n = 67, upgrading) and Group 2 (n = 69, nonupgrading).

RESULTS

Gleason upgrading (GU) was found in 67 (49.3%) patients, and 17 patients (12.5%) were upstaged to pT3a. The upgrading to Gleason 3 + 4 was reported in 38.7% of patients, however, 7.4%, and 3.7% of the patients were upgraded to Gleason 4 + 3, and Gleason 4 + 4, respectively. The 10.3% of the patients had extraprostatic involvement, and the rate (19.4% vs 1.4%, P = .002) was significantly higher in Group 1. PSA density (P = .001), tumor size (P < .001), tumor percentage (P < .001), apical involvement (P = .013), and perineural invasion (P < .001) in RP specimen were higher in Group 1. Multivariate analysis showed that perineural invasion (OR = 4.26; 95%CI: 1.76-10.33; P = .001) and pathologic T stage (OR = 5.45; 95%CI: 1.08-27.4; P = .04) were independently associated with GU.

CONCLUSIONS

Since 12.5% of the patients upstaged to pT3a disease, and there is a possible risk of Gleason 4 pattern, upgrading of the tumor should carefully be kept in mind before offering AS to low-risk patients with PCa.

摘要

背景

主动监测(AS)是低危前列腺癌(PCa)的治疗选择之一。本研究调查了接受 RP 时符合 AS 条件的患者术后病理升级情况。

方法

2006 年 8 月至 2017 年 7 月,我院共 627 例患者接受 RP。本研究纳入了 67 例在 RP 时符合 AS 标准的患者,其中 Gleason 评分 3+3=6 分(在最大的两个活检组织中),前列腺特异抗原(PSA)<10ng/ml,临床 T 分期≤2a。回顾性比较两组患者的人口统计学、临床和组织病理学结果,根据最终病理结果分为 2 组:第 1 组(n=67,升级)和第 2 组(n=69,未升级)。

结果

67 例(49.3%)患者发生 Gleason 升级(GU),17 例(12.5%)患者升级为 pT3a。38.7%的患者升级为 Gleason 3+4,7.4%和 3.7%的患者升级为 Gleason 4+3 和 Gleason 4+4。10.3%的患者存在前列腺外侵犯,第 1 组的发生率(19.4%比 1.4%,P=0.002)显著更高。RP 标本中 PSA 密度(P=0.001)、肿瘤大小(P<0.001)、肿瘤百分比(P<0.001)、尖部累及(P=0.013)和神经周围侵犯(P<0.001)在第 1 组中更高。多因素分析显示,神经周围侵犯(OR=4.26;95%CI:1.76-10.33;P=0.001)和病理 T 分期(OR=5.45;95%CI:1.08-27.4;P=0.04)与 GU 独立相关。

结论

由于 12.5%的患者升级为 pT3a 疾病,并且存在 Gleason 4 模式的潜在风险,因此在向低危 PCa 患者提供 AS 之前,应仔细考虑肿瘤的升级。

相似文献

1
The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer patients who are eligible for active surveillance: How safe is it to depend on bioptic pathology?低危前列腺癌患者行根治性前列腺切除术后的病理升级:依靠活检病理检查有多安全?
Prostate. 2019 Sep;79(13):1523-1529. doi: 10.1002/pros.23873. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
2
The clinical predictive factors and postoperative histopathological parameters associated with upgrading after radical prostatectomy: A contemporary analysis with grade groups.根治性前列腺切除术后与升级相关的临床预测因素和术后组织病理学参数:基于分级组的当代分析。
Prostate. 2020 Feb;80(2):225-234. doi: 10.1002/pros.23936. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
3
Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.在经直肠超声(TRUS)引导下穿刺活检 Gleason 评分 3 + 4 = 7 的前列腺癌患者中,筛状形态可预测根治性前列腺切除术后分期升级。
Virchows Arch. 2015 Oct;467(4):437-42. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1809-5. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
4
Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.基于达米科分类的低风险前列腺癌的异质性:根据主动监测资格在升级和分期进展方面的差异。
Urol Oncol. 2015 Jul;33(7):329.e13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 May 7.
5
Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.基于人群的研究:预测前列腺癌 Gleason6 评分患者主动监测不良病理的因素。
J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):350-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.09.034. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
6
Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.根治性前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分升级的临床和病理预测因素:单机构系列研究结果。
Urol Oncol. 2011 Sep-Oct;29(5):508-14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
7
Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?适合主动监测的前列腺癌患者的病理升级:前列腺特异性抗原密度有影响吗?
Korean J Urol. 2015 Sep;56(9):624-9. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.624. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
8
Pathologic Outcomes of Gleason 6 Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Active Surveillance.前列腺根治性切除术治疗格里森 6 分有利中危前列腺癌的病理结局:主动监测的意义。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Jun;16(3):226-234. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
9
Postoperative upgrading of prostate cancer in men ≥75 years: a propensity score-matched analysis.男性年龄≥75 岁的前列腺癌术后升级:倾向评分匹配分析。
World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1517-1524. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2045-1. Epub 2017 May 10.
10
Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.经直肠超声(TRUS)引导下活检检测到的Gleason 4级形态在预测Gleason评分3 + 4 = 7的前列腺癌升级或分期升高方面的效用
Virchows Arch. 2016 Sep;469(3):313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00428-016-1981-2. Epub 2016 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The Added Value of MRI-Based Targeted Biopsy in Biopsy-Naïve Patients: A Propensity-Score Matched Comparison.基于MRI的靶向活检在初诊患者中的附加价值:倾向评分匹配比较
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 27;13(5):1355. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051355.
2
A contemporary analysis of disease upstaging of Gleason 3 + 3 prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后 Gleason 3+3 前列腺癌患者疾病升级的当代分析。
Cancer Med. 2023 Nov;12(22):20830-20837. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6651. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
3
Adverse Pathology after Radical Prostatectomy of Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance-A Summary 7 Years after Introducing mpMRI-Guided Biopsy in a Real-World Setting.
主动监测适用患者根治性前列腺切除术后的不良病理学——在真实环境中引入mpMRI引导活检7年后的总结
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Feb 13;10(2):247. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020247.
4
Role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review.多参数磁共振成像融合活检在前列腺癌主动监测中的作用:一项系统综述
Ther Adv Urol. 2022 Jul 18;14:17562872221106883. doi: 10.1177/17562872221106883. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
5
Predictors of upgrading from low-grade cancer at prostatectomy in men with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging.双参数磁共振成像男性患者前列腺切除术中低级别癌症升级的预测因素
Cent European J Urol. 2022;75(1):35-40. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0217. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
6
Endogenous testosterone density as ratio of endogenous testosterone levels on prostate volume predicts tumor upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer.基于前列腺体积的内源性睾酮密度与内源性睾酮水平的比值可预测低危前列腺癌的肿瘤升级。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Dec;53(12):2505-2515. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-03008-0. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
7
The role of mpMRI in qualification of patients with ISUP 1 prostate cancer on biopsy to radical prostatectomy.mpMRI 在活检 ISUP 1 前列腺癌患者行根治性前列腺切除术的资格评定中的作用。
BMC Urol. 2021 May 18;21(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00850-3.
8
Upgrading on radical prostatectomy specimens of very low- and low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: A population-level analysis.主动监测下极低风险和低风险前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术标本的升级:一项基于人群水平的分析。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Jul;15(7):E335-E339. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6868.
9
Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator Apps in a Taiwanese Population Cohort: Validation Study.前列腺癌风险计算器应用程序在台湾人群队列中的应用:验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 18;22(12):e16322. doi: 10.2196/16322.