• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定一份关于分量管理跨部门合作的路线图,作为改善人群营养的国家战略——一项德尔菲研究。

Informing a roadmap for cross-sectoral collaboration on portion size management as a national strategy to improve population nutrition - a Delphi study.

作者信息

Barata-Cavalcanti O, Ty D, Novelli W, Costa S, Huang T T-K

机构信息

Center for Systems and Community Design, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy City University of New York New York NY USA.

Global Social Enterprise Initiative, McDonough School of Business Georgetown University Washington DC USA.

出版信息

Obes Sci Pract. 2019 Feb 27;5(3):189-202. doi: 10.1002/osp4.331. eCollection 2019 Jun.

DOI:10.1002/osp4.331
PMID:31275593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6587328/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Addressing food portion sizes is a key untapped opportunity to help tackle obesity. This study sought to inform the agenda of a national movement involving diverse sectors to manage portion sizes in packaged foods, restaurants, cafeterias and prepared foods in grocery stores.

METHODS

A Delphi study was conducted with representatives from public health, private-sector food companies and academia that formed a panel of experts ( = 32). Three iterative rounds of surveys were administered over 3 months. The surveys gathered opinions on psychological mindsets affecting portion size choice, eating habits, portion perception and distortion, passive overconsumption and challenges and advantages of this tool to improve population nutrition. The survey also inquired about visions for a future food environment. After every round, responses were analysed and questions narrowed to reach group consensus on specific items in the subsequent round.

RESULTS

Although many experts fear that portion size interventions might be perceived as paternalistic, 91% of respondents agreed stealth interventions were preferable. Seventy-three per cent of experts believed that the most impactful portion size intervention was product reformulation while smaller packages were the most effective intervention according to only 28% of experts. The majority of the panel (59%) also believed that creating an artificial stopping point in packages was the best strategy to reduce food consumption. Finally, the study found that one of the most complex aspects of establishing a multi-sector collaboration for obesity prevention was to ascertain trust in the private sector's ability to balance profit versus social responsibility.[Corrections added on 21 March 2019, after first online publication: The percentage of experts who believed that small packages were the most effective intervention has been changed from "16%" to "28%".].

CONCLUSION

This study informs the agenda of a cross-sectoral, coordinated movement to tackle obesity through a combination of changing social norms, individual behaviours and industry practices around portion size. Although cross-sectoral collaboration for non-communicable disease prevention is encouraged by different organizations, strategic efforts to define a common agenda on portion size have been limited thus far. This research highlights important strategies in portion size interventions and steps needed for the success of such a movement, as part of a wider effort across sectors and stakeholders to halt and reverse obesity rates in the USA.

摘要

背景

控制食物分量是帮助解决肥胖问题的一个关键但尚未开发的机会。本研究旨在为一项全国性运动提供议程参考,该运动涉及多个领域,旨在管理包装食品、餐厅、自助餐厅和杂货店预制食品的分量。

方法

对来自公共卫生、私营食品公司和学术界的代表进行了一项德尔菲研究,这些代表组成了一个专家小组(n = 32)。在3个月内进行了三轮迭代调查。调查收集了关于影响分量选择的心理思维模式、饮食习惯、分量认知与偏差、被动过度消费以及该工具对改善人群营养的挑战和优势的意见。调查还询问了对未来食品环境的展望。每一轮之后,对回复进行分析,并缩小问题范围,以便在后续轮次中就特定项目达成小组共识。

结果

尽管许多专家担心分量干预措施可能被视为家长式作风,但91%的受访者同意隐性干预更为可取。73%的专家认为最有影响力的分量干预措施是产品重新配方,而只有28%的专家认为小包装是最有效的干预措施。大多数专家小组(59%)还认为,在包装中设置人为的停止点是减少食物消费的最佳策略。最后,研究发现,建立多部门肥胖预防合作最复杂的方面之一是确定对私营部门平衡利润与社会责任能力的信任。[2019年3月21日首次在线发表后添加的更正:认为小包装是最有效干预措施的专家百分比已从“16%”更改为“28%”。]

结论

本研究为一项跨部门、协调一致的运动提供了议程参考,该运动旨在通过改变围绕分量的社会规范、个人行为和行业做法来解决肥胖问题。尽管不同组织鼓励开展跨部门非传染性疾病预防合作,但迄今为止,在确定分量方面共同议程的战略努力有限。本研究突出了分量干预中的重要策略以及该运动成功所需的步骤,这是美国各部门和利益相关者为阻止和扭转肥胖率而进行的更广泛努力的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37e0/6587328/d15c44b6c01b/OSP4-5-189-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37e0/6587328/68601dbfddd9/OSP4-5-189-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37e0/6587328/75ee3e229b47/OSP4-5-189-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37e0/6587328/d15c44b6c01b/OSP4-5-189-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37e0/6587328/68601dbfddd9/OSP4-5-189-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37e0/6587328/75ee3e229b47/OSP4-5-189-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37e0/6587328/d15c44b6c01b/OSP4-5-189-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Informing a roadmap for cross-sectoral collaboration on portion size management as a national strategy to improve population nutrition - a Delphi study.制定一份关于分量管理跨部门合作的路线图,作为改善人群营养的国家战略——一项德尔菲研究。
Obes Sci Pract. 2019 Feb 27;5(3):189-202. doi: 10.1002/osp4.331. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Developing a Consensus for Adolescent and Young Adult mHealth HIV Prevention Interventions in the United States: A Delphi Method Study.在美国制定青少年和青年移动健康HIV预防干预措施的共识:一项德尔菲法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 12;6(7):e25982. doi: 10.2196/25982.
5
Portion distortion: typical portion sizes selected by young adults.份量偏差:年轻人选择的典型份量大小。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Sep;106(9):1412-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.06.006.
6
360-degree Delphi: addressing sociotechnical challenges of healthcare IT.360 度德尔菲法:应对医疗信息技术的社会技术挑战。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1071-x.
7
Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non-alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption.用于更健康食品或非酒精饮料购买及消费的营养标签。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 27;2(2):CD009315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2.
8
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
9
Developing co-funded multi-sectoral partnerships for chronic disease prevention: a qualitative inquiry into federal governmental public health staff experience.建立用于慢性病预防的多方共同资助的多部门伙伴关系:对联邦政府公共卫生工作人员经验的定性调查
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Aug 20;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00609-6.
10
Setting an International Research Agenda for Fear of Cancer Recurrence: An Online Delphi Consensus Study.为癌症复发恐惧设定国际研究议程:一项在线德尔菲共识研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 22;12:596682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.596682. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in Package Sizes of Savoury Snacks through Exploration of Euromonitor and Industry Perspectives.通过探索 Euromonitor 和行业视角,了解咸味零食的包装尺寸变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 30;19(15):9359. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159359.
2
The campaign "This Is Public Health" in Italy, set up by a team of Public Health Schools in Northern Italy.意大利北部公共卫生学校团队设立的宣传活动“这就是公共卫生”。
Acta Biomed. 2020 Apr 10;91(3-S):171-174. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i3-S.9508.
3
Atti Le giornate della ricerca scientificae delle esperienze professionali dei giovani: Società Italiana di Igiene, Medicina Preventiva e Sanità Pubblica (SItI) Roma 20-21 dicembre 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2015-2016.2015 - 2016年美国成年人及青少年肥胖症患病率
NCHS Data Brief. 2017 Oct(288):1-8.
2
Portion Size: Latest Developments and Interventions.食物分量:最新进展与干预措施
Curr Obes Rep. 2017 Mar;6(1):10-17. doi: 10.1007/s13679-017-0239-x.
3
Strengthening of accountability systems to create healthy food environments and reduce global obesity.加强问责制,营造健康食品环境,减少全球肥胖。
《青年科研日与职业经验:意大利卫生、预防医学与公共卫生学会(SItI),罗马,2019年12月20 - 21日》会议纪要
J Prev Med Hyg. 2020 Feb 13;60(4 Suppl 3):E1-E85. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.4s3. eCollection 2020 Feb.
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2534-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61747-5. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
4
Cross-sector partnerships and public health: challenges and opportunities for addressing obesity and noncommunicable diseases through engagement with the private sector.跨部门伙伴关系与公共卫生:通过与私营部门合作应对肥胖和非传染性疾病的挑战与机遇。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:255-71. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122802. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
5
Portion size and obesity.食物分量与肥胖
Adv Nutr. 2014 Nov 14;5(6):829-34. doi: 10.3945/an.114.007104. Print 2014 Nov.
6
PortionControl@HOME: results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of a multi-component portion size intervention on portion control behavior and body mass index.家庭饮食分量控制:一项随机对照试验的结果,评估多成分食物分量干预对饮食分量控制行为和体重指数的影响。
Ann Behav Med. 2015 Feb;49(1):18-28. doi: 10.1007/s12160-014-9637-4.
7
Portion size: what we know and what we need to know.食物分量:我们已知的和我们需要了解的。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55(7):988-1004. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.679980.
8
Comparing two psychological interventions in reducing impulsive processes of eating behaviour: effects on self-selected portion size.比较两种心理干预措施对减少冲动性饮食行为的影响:对自我选择食物分量的作用
Br J Health Psychol. 2014 Nov;19(4):767-82. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12075. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
9
Behavioural strategies to control the amount of food selected and consumed.控制所选择和消耗的食物量的行为策略。
Appetite. 2014 Jan;72:156-65. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.09.015. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
10
Reducing portion sizes to prevent obesity: a call to action.减小食物分量以预防肥胖:行动呼吁。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Nov;43(5):565-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.024.