Barata-Cavalcanti O, Ty D, Novelli W, Costa S, Huang T T-K
Center for Systems and Community Design, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy City University of New York New York NY USA.
Global Social Enterprise Initiative, McDonough School of Business Georgetown University Washington DC USA.
Obes Sci Pract. 2019 Feb 27;5(3):189-202. doi: 10.1002/osp4.331. eCollection 2019 Jun.
Addressing food portion sizes is a key untapped opportunity to help tackle obesity. This study sought to inform the agenda of a national movement involving diverse sectors to manage portion sizes in packaged foods, restaurants, cafeterias and prepared foods in grocery stores.
A Delphi study was conducted with representatives from public health, private-sector food companies and academia that formed a panel of experts ( = 32). Three iterative rounds of surveys were administered over 3 months. The surveys gathered opinions on psychological mindsets affecting portion size choice, eating habits, portion perception and distortion, passive overconsumption and challenges and advantages of this tool to improve population nutrition. The survey also inquired about visions for a future food environment. After every round, responses were analysed and questions narrowed to reach group consensus on specific items in the subsequent round.
Although many experts fear that portion size interventions might be perceived as paternalistic, 91% of respondents agreed stealth interventions were preferable. Seventy-three per cent of experts believed that the most impactful portion size intervention was product reformulation while smaller packages were the most effective intervention according to only 28% of experts. The majority of the panel (59%) also believed that creating an artificial stopping point in packages was the best strategy to reduce food consumption. Finally, the study found that one of the most complex aspects of establishing a multi-sector collaboration for obesity prevention was to ascertain trust in the private sector's ability to balance profit versus social responsibility.[Corrections added on 21 March 2019, after first online publication: The percentage of experts who believed that small packages were the most effective intervention has been changed from "16%" to "28%".].
This study informs the agenda of a cross-sectoral, coordinated movement to tackle obesity through a combination of changing social norms, individual behaviours and industry practices around portion size. Although cross-sectoral collaboration for non-communicable disease prevention is encouraged by different organizations, strategic efforts to define a common agenda on portion size have been limited thus far. This research highlights important strategies in portion size interventions and steps needed for the success of such a movement, as part of a wider effort across sectors and stakeholders to halt and reverse obesity rates in the USA.
控制食物分量是帮助解决肥胖问题的一个关键但尚未开发的机会。本研究旨在为一项全国性运动提供议程参考,该运动涉及多个领域,旨在管理包装食品、餐厅、自助餐厅和杂货店预制食品的分量。
对来自公共卫生、私营食品公司和学术界的代表进行了一项德尔菲研究,这些代表组成了一个专家小组(n = 32)。在3个月内进行了三轮迭代调查。调查收集了关于影响分量选择的心理思维模式、饮食习惯、分量认知与偏差、被动过度消费以及该工具对改善人群营养的挑战和优势的意见。调查还询问了对未来食品环境的展望。每一轮之后,对回复进行分析,并缩小问题范围,以便在后续轮次中就特定项目达成小组共识。
尽管许多专家担心分量干预措施可能被视为家长式作风,但91%的受访者同意隐性干预更为可取。73%的专家认为最有影响力的分量干预措施是产品重新配方,而只有28%的专家认为小包装是最有效的干预措施。大多数专家小组(59%)还认为,在包装中设置人为的停止点是减少食物消费的最佳策略。最后,研究发现,建立多部门肥胖预防合作最复杂的方面之一是确定对私营部门平衡利润与社会责任能力的信任。[2019年3月21日首次在线发表后添加的更正:认为小包装是最有效干预措施的专家百分比已从“16%”更改为“28%”。]
本研究为一项跨部门、协调一致的运动提供了议程参考,该运动旨在通过改变围绕分量的社会规范、个人行为和行业做法来解决肥胖问题。尽管不同组织鼓励开展跨部门非传染性疾病预防合作,但迄今为止,在确定分量方面共同议程的战略努力有限。本研究突出了分量干预中的重要策略以及该运动成功所需的步骤,这是美国各部门和利益相关者为阻止和扭转肥胖率而进行的更广泛努力的一部分。