Susan A. Kayser, PhD, Hillrom, Batesville, Indiana. LeeAnn Phipps, PhD, Hillrom, Batesville, Indiana. Catherine A. VanGilder, MBA, BS, MT, CCRA, Hillrom, Batesville, Indiana. Charlie Lachenbruch, PhD, Hillrom, Batesville, Indiana.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019 Jul/Aug;46(4):285-290. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000548.
To evaluate prevalence and risk factors of incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD).
Retrospective analysis of 2016 International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence survey data.
Adult patients who were in acute care, long-term acute care, long-term care, and rehabilitation facilities in the United States and Canada.
IAD prevalence was calculated among all patients surveyed, among the incontinent patients only, across multiple care settings, and by incontinence type. A logistic regression examined risk factors for IAD in the incontinent population.
Nearly 1 in 5 incontinent patients had IAD documented. Incontinence-associated dermatitis prevalence in the entire patient population was 4.3% while incontinence prevalence was 18%. Of incontinent patients, prevalence of IAD ranged from 8.4% in long-term care facilities to 19% in acute care facilities. Facilities with higher rates of incontinence did not necessarily have higher prevalence of IAD. Incontinence-associated dermatitis prevalence by incontinence type ranged from 12% for patients with urinary incontinence to 26% for patients with fecal management systems. Regression results support the association of the following factors with an increased likelihood of IAD documented: all types of incontinence, fecal management systems, higher body weight, diminished mobility, additional linen layers, longer length of stay, and lower Braden Scale scores.
Incontinence-associated dermatitis remains a concern in acute care settings. Risk factors associated with IAD were similar to risk factors previously reported for hospital-acquired pressure injuries, such as limited mobility, longer lengths of stay, and additional linen layers. By consistently documenting IAD as well as pressure injury prevalence, facilities may benchmark overall skin prevention models.
评估失禁相关性皮炎(IAD)的患病率和相关风险因素。
对 2016 年国际压疮患病率调查数据进行回顾性分析。
美国和加拿大的急性护理、长期急性护理、长期护理和康复设施中的成年患者。
在所有接受调查的患者中计算 IAD 的患病率,仅在失禁患者中,在多个护理场所中,并按失禁类型计算。使用逻辑回归分析失禁人群中 IAD 的风险因素。
近五分之一的失禁患者有记录的 IAD。整个患者群体中 IAD 的患病率为 4.3%,而失禁的患病率为 18%。在失禁患者中,IAD 的患病率从长期护理机构的 8.4%到急性护理机构的 19%不等。失禁率较高的机构并不一定具有较高的 IAD 患病率。按失禁类型划分的 IAD 患病率范围从尿失禁患者的 12%到粪便管理系统患者的 26%。回归结果支持以下因素与记录的 IAD 发生可能性增加之间的关联:所有类型的失禁、粪便管理系统、较高的体重、活动能力下降、增加的被褥层、住院时间延长和较低的布雷登评分。
失禁相关性皮炎仍然是急性护理环境中的一个问题。与先前报道的医院获得性压疮相关的 IAD 风险因素相似,例如活动能力受限、住院时间延长和增加的被褥层。通过持续记录 IAD 和压疮的患病率,医疗机构可以为整体皮肤预防模型提供基准。