Center for Subjectivity Research, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark; Mental Health Centre Amager, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Center for Subjectivity Research, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Sep;74:102770. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102770. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
In contemporary consciousness research, we have defended a position of experiential minimalism, arguing that for-me-ness (or minimal selfhood) is a necessary, universal feature of phenomenal consciousness. The concept of for-me-ness refers to the fact that experiences are given first-personally to the subject of experience. To challenge the universality of for-me-ness, several authors have referred to the case of thought insertion as a clear counter example. In this study, we address and refute the claim that episodes of thought insertion represent examples of experiences lacking for-me-ness. We highlight certain unaddressed methodological and psychopathological problems that tend to hamper philosophical discussions of thought insertion. Although thought insertion does not involve a lack of for-me-ness, we do argue that thought insertion involves a disturbed for-me-ness. Finally, we offer a novel account of how for-me-ness is disturbed in schizophrenia spectrum disorders and we discuss how a disturbed for-me-ness may be involved in the formation of thought insertion.
在当代意识研究中,我们主张一种经验的极简主义立场,认为对我而言(或最小自我)是现象意识的一个必要的、普遍的特征。对我而言的概念是指经验首先被给予经验的主体。为了挑战对我而言的普遍性,几位作者提到了思想插入的情况,作为一个明显的反例。在这项研究中,我们解决并反驳了这样一种观点,即思想插入的例子代表了缺乏对我而言的经验。我们强调了一些未解决的方法论和精神病理学问题,这些问题往往会阻碍对思想插入的哲学讨论。虽然思想插入并不涉及对我而言的缺乏,但我们确实认为思想插入涉及到对我而言的紊乱。最后,我们提出了一种新的解释,说明对我而言是如何在精神分裂症谱系障碍中受到干扰的,我们还讨论了对我而言的紊乱是如何参与思想插入的形成的。