Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Xuzhou Municipal Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou First People's Hospital, Xuzhou Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment Institute, Xuzhou, China.
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 3;10:1029002. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1029002. eCollection 2022.
Based on the Chinese version of the Catquest-9SF scale, the contrast sensitivity meter and wavefront aberrometer were used to evaluate the visual quality of cataract patients implanted with different spherical aberrations IOL.
Retrospective Observational Study.
Patients who had the lens implantation in our department from January 2020 to December 2021 were enrolled. All patients underwent uncorrected visual acuity, best corrected visual acuity and slit lamp microscope, high-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity test. The KR-1W wavefront analyzer (Topcon Medical System, Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure wavefront aberrations post-operation. The Chinese Catquest-9SF scale was used to score the postoperative visual satisfaction of the patients.
145 patients were screened according to the exclusion criteria, including 51 patients in the zero aspherical IOL (SOFTEC HD) group, 42 patients in the negative aspherical IOL (ZCB00) group, and a total of 52 patients in the spherical IOL (HQ-201HEP) group. The score was the highest in the zero spherical aberration group, followed by the negative spherical aberration group with the lowest scores in the spherical IOL group. Higher-order aberrations are relatively low in eyes implanted with the zero spherical aberration group. Contrast sensitivity with spherical lenses under glare-free and glare conditions was lower than those with aspheric lenses, and at higher frequencies the zero-aberration aspheric lens performed the best.
The Chinese Catquest-9SF scale provides an indication of visual quality after aspheric IOL implantation.
基于中文版 Catquest-9SF 量表，使用对比敏感度计和波前像差仪评估植入不同球差人工晶状体的白内障患者的视觉质量。
回顾性观察研究。
纳入 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月在我院接受晶状体植入的患者。所有患者均接受未矫正视力、最佳矫正视力和裂隙灯显微镜检查、高阶像差和对比敏感度检查。使用 KR-1W 波前分析仪（Topcon Medical System，东京，日本）测量术后波前像差。采用中文版 Catquest-9SF 量表对患者术后视觉满意度进行评分。
根据排除标准筛选出 145 例患者，其中零球差人工晶状体（SOFTEC HD）组 51 例，负球差人工晶状体（ZCB00）组 42 例，球差人工晶状体（HQ-201HEP）组 52 例。零球差组评分最高，负球差组评分最低，零球差组眼内高阶像差相对较低。在无眩光和眩光条件下，球差晶状体的对比敏感度均低于非球差晶状体，在较高频率下，零像差非球差晶状体表现最佳。
中文版 Catquest-9SF 量表为非球面人工晶状体植入术后的视觉质量提供了一个指标。
