• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AtLisa tri 839 MP 与 Symfony 人工晶状体植入术后的视觉效果比较。

Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of AtLisa tri 839 MP and Symfony intraocular lenses.

机构信息

2nd Chair and Department of Ophthalmology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powstańców Wlkp. 72, 70-111, Szczecin, Poland.

Chair and Department of Basic and Clinical Anatomy, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct;40(10):2553-2562. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01435-z. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1007/s10792-020-01435-z
PMID:32488596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7502443/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare visual outcomes after implantation of AtLisa tri 839 MP and Symfony intraocular lenses (IOLs).

METHODS

All subjects underwent sequential bilateral cataract extraction with AtLisa tri 839 MP or Symfony IOL implantation. The design is prospective case series. Each group consists of 20 patients (40 eyes). At 1 year postoperatively, the following parameters were analysed: binocular uncorrected visual acuity (log MAR): for distance (UDVA) at 4 m, for intermediate distances (UIVA) at 60, 70, 80 cm and for near (UNVA) at 40 cm, defocus curve, mesopic and photopic contrast sensitivities (CSs), spectacle independence, visual function test questionnaire modified VFQ-25), photopic phenomena and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

In the AtLisa tri 839 MP group, the mean binocular UNVA and UIVA were significantly better than in the Symfony group (UNVA: - 0.01 ± 0.04 vs. 0.21 ± 0.15; p = 0.000; 60 cm UIVA: - 0.01 ± 0.04 vs. 0.09 ± 0.09, p = 0.001; 70 cm UIVA - 0.05 ± 0.06 vs. 0.11 ± 0.08, p = 0.002; 80 cm UIVA - 0.01 ± 0.06 vs. 0.15 ± 0.08, p = 0.019). There were no significant between-group differences in the mean binocular UDVA and CS, with one exception: the mean binocular distance CS (18 cpd) under mesopic conditions was significantly better in the Symfony group than in the AtLisa tri 839 MP group (1.39 ± 0.22 vs. 1.17 ± 0.27; p = 0.015). The defocus curve analysis revealed significant between-group differences at vergences of 2.0 to - 4.0 D (p < 0.05), except for 2.0, 1.0, 0 and - 1.5. All subjects in AtLisa tri 839 MP group and 18 subjects (90%) in Symfony group were spectacle independent. Patients from both groups highly rated their overall vision quality in the VFQ-25 (1.67 ± 0.47 vs. 1.85 ± 0.5 in the Symfony and AtLisa tri 839 MP group, respectively, p = NS). The scores for daytime driving (1.00 ± 0.00 vs. 1.21 ± 0.36; p = 0.002), night driving (1.57 ± 0.55 vs. 2.13 ± 1.15; p = 0.027) and difficult situation driving (1.14 ± 0.31 vs. 1.53 ± 0.56; p = 0.049) were significantly better in the AtLisa tri 839 MP group than in the Symfony group. The incidence and perception level of halo and glare were significantly reduced (p = 0.00) in the Symfony group as compared to the AtLisa tri 839 MP group. The postoperative course was uneventful in all subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual outcomes achieved with both IOLs are comparable. In both groups, 90% of patients achieved spectacle independence. Whereas the AtLisa tri 839 MP IOL implantation was associated with slightly better intermediate distance VA and significantly better near VA, photic phenomena were less perceived by patients with Symfony IOLs.

摘要

目的

比较 AtLisa tri 839 MP 和 Symfony 人工晶状体(IOL)植入术后的视觉效果。

方法

所有患者均行双眼顺序白内障超声乳化吸除术联合 AtLisa tri 839 MP 或 Symfony IOL 植入术。本研究为前瞻性病例系列研究。每组 20 例(40 眼)。术后 1 年,分析以下参数:双眼未矫正视力(logMAR):远距(UDVA)4 m,中距(UIVA)60、70、80 cm,近距(UNVA)40 cm,离焦曲线,中、明视对比度敏感度(CSs),脱镜率,视觉功能测试问卷改良 VFQ-25,明视和术后并发症。

结果

在 AtLisa tri 839 MP 组中,双眼 UNVA 和 UIVA 均显著优于 Symfony 组(UNVA:-0.01±0.04 vs. 0.21±0.15;p=0.000;60 cm UIVA:-0.01±0.04 vs. 0.09±0.09,p=0.001;70 cm UIVA:-0.05±0.06 vs. 0.11±0.08,p=0.002;80 cm UIVA:-0.01±0.06 vs. 0.15±0.08,p=0.019)。两组间双眼 UDVA 和 CS 均值无显著差异,但有一个例外:明视条件下双眼距离 CS(18 cpd)在 Symfony 组显著优于 AtLisa tri 839 MP 组(1.39±0.22 vs. 1.17±0.27;p=0.015)。离焦曲线分析显示,2.0 至-4.0 D 之间的差异有统计学意义(p<0.05),2.0、1.0、0 和-1.5 除外。AtLisa tri 839 MP 组所有患者和 Symfony 组 18 例(90%)患者均脱镜。两组患者在 VFQ-25 中对总体视觉质量的评分均较高(Symfony 和 AtLisa tri 839 MP 组分别为 1.67±0.47 和 1.85±0.5,p=NS)。日间驾驶(1.00±0.00 vs. 1.21±0.36;p=0.002)、夜间驾驶(1.57±0.55 vs. 2.13±1.15;p=0.027)和困难情况驾驶(1.14±0.31 vs. 1.53±0.56;p=0.049)评分在 AtLisa tri 839 MP 组显著优于 Symfony 组。Symfony 组的光晕和眩光发生率和感知水平显著降低(p=0.00)。所有患者术后均无并发症。

结论

两种 IOL 的视觉效果相当。两组中,90%的患者脱镜。虽然 AtLisa tri 839 MP IOL 植入术后中距视力和近距视力略好,但 Symfony IOL 植入术后患者对光幻视的感知较少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48be/7502443/fe605e011bc0/10792_2020_1435_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48be/7502443/0156cb3d7854/10792_2020_1435_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48be/7502443/1a5c5688fefd/10792_2020_1435_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48be/7502443/31857c33bcf5/10792_2020_1435_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48be/7502443/1bd5f5a590f1/10792_2020_1435_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48be/7502443/fe605e011bc0/10792_2020_1435_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48be/7502443/0156cb3d7854/10792_2020_1435_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48be/7502443/1a5c5688fefd/10792_2020_1435_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48be/7502443/31857c33bcf5/10792_2020_1435_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48be/7502443/1bd5f5a590f1/10792_2020_1435_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48be/7502443/fe605e011bc0/10792_2020_1435_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of AtLisa tri 839 MP and Symfony intraocular lenses.AtLisa tri 839 MP 与 Symfony 人工晶状体植入术后的视觉效果比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct;40(10):2553-2562. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01435-z. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
2
Comparison of the intermediate distance of a trifocal IOL with an extended depth-of-focus IOL: results of a prospective randomized trial.三焦点人工晶状体与扩展景深人工晶状体的中间距离比较:前瞻性随机试验结果。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Feb;46(2):193-203. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000012.
3
Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens (Alcon Acrysof IQ® PanOptix) and extended depth of focus lens (Tecnis® Symfony® ZXR00 lens).三焦点人工晶状体(爱尔康 Acrysof IQ® PanOptix)与扩展景深人工晶状体(Tecnis® Symfony® ZXR00 晶状体)双侧植入的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;41(2):567-573. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01608-w. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Visual Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens and an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens.双眼植入衍射三焦点人工晶状体与扩展景深人工晶状体的视觉效果比较评估。
Eye Contact Lens. 2020 Sep;46(5):314-318. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000637.
5
Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of extended range of vision and trifocal intraocular lenses.双眼植入扩展视觉范围人工晶状体和三焦点人工晶状体后的视觉效果比较。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 26;27(4):460-465. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000935. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
6
Visual performance comparison of 2 extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses.两种扩展景深人工晶状体的视觉性能比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Mar;46(3):388-393. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000068.
7
Comparative analysis of visual outcome with 3 intraocular lenses: monofocal, enhanced monofocal, and extended depth of focus.三种人工晶状体的视觉效果比较分析:单焦点、增强型单焦点和扩展景深。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Jan 1;48(1):67-74. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000706.
8
Clinical outcomes of a monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function compared with an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens.与扩展景深人工晶状体相比,具有增强中间功能的单焦点人工晶状体的临床结果。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Jan 1;48(1):61-66. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000710.
9
Prospective comparative study of tolerance to refractive errors after implantation of extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lenses with identical aspheric platform in Korean population.韩国人群中扩展景深和单焦点人工晶状体在相同非球面平台植入术后对屈光误差的耐受性前瞻性对比研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug 19;19(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1193-z.
10
Visual function after implantation of a diffractive aspheric trifocal intraocular lens.衍射非球面三焦点人工晶状体植入术后的视觉功能
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 4;26(5):405-11. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000741. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual outcomes with a non-diffractive enhanced depth-of-focus IOL in patients with age-related macular degeneration.非衍射型增强深度聚焦人工晶状体用于年龄相关性黄斑变性患者的视觉效果。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 13;12:1505401. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1505401. eCollection 2025.
2
Ray Visualization and Through-Focus Optical Quality of Diffractive Enhanced Monofocal and Extended-Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses.衍射增强型单焦点和扩展焦深人工晶状体的光线可视化及全聚焦光学质量
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 May 21;19:1673-1682. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S520086. eCollection 2025.
3
Risk factors in self-reported dissatisfied patients implanted with various presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses after cataract surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparative study of the visual outcomes between a new trifocal and an extended depth of focus intraocular lens.新型三焦点人工晶状体与扩展景深人工晶状体视觉效果的比较研究
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;28(2):182-187. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5001029. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
2
Clinical evaluation of surgery-induced astigmatism in cataract surgery using 2.2 mm or 1.8 mm clear corneal micro-incisions.使用2.2毫米或1.8毫米透明角膜微小切口对白内障手术中手术诱导散光的临床评估。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan 18;10(1):68-71. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.01.11. eCollection 2017.
3
Evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and standard phacoemulsification through 2.75 mm incision.
白内障手术后植入各种矫正老花眼人工晶状体的自我报告不满意患者的危险因素。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 19;25(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03912-4.
4
Impact of central corneal astigmatism on postoperative visual outcomes in patients undergoing trifocal intraocular lens implantation.中央角膜散光对接受三焦点人工晶状体植入术患者术后视觉效果的影响。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 14;25(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03860-z.
5
Clinical Outcomes of a New Hydrophobic Trifocal Intraocular Lens with Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate in Cataract Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study.白内障手术中一种新型甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯疏水三焦点人工晶状体的临床结果:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun;38(3):212-220. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2023.0140. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
6
Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantations of three types of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses that have undergone corneal refractive surgery.经过角膜屈光手术后三种矫正老视的人工晶状体植入的视觉效果和患者满意度。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 10;14(1):8386. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58653-z.
7
Comparative Analysis of the Visual, Refractive and Aberrometric Outcome with the Use of 2 Intraocular Refractive Segment Multifocal Lenses.使用两种眼内屈光节段多焦点人工晶状体的视觉、屈光和像差结果的对比分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 31;13(1):239. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010239.
8
Comparative Evaluation of Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction following Cataract Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens and a Diffractive Multifocal Lens with Extended Depth of Focus.白内障手术后视觉性能与患者满意度的比较评估:对一种扩展焦深人工晶状体和一种具有扩展焦深的衍射多焦点人工晶状体的回顾性分析。
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 28;12(23):7368. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237368.
9
Comparison of astigmatism correction and visual outcomes in mix-and-match implantations of trifocal intraocular lenses with femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy and contralateral bifocal Toric intraocular lenses.飞秒激光辅助弧形角膜切开术联合三焦点人工晶状体与对侧双焦点散光人工晶状体混合植入的散光矫正及视觉效果比较
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 4;10:1237319. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1237319. eCollection 2023.
10
Comparative Analysis of Optical Quality of Monofocal, Enhanced Monofocal, Multifocal, and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Mobile Model Eye Study.单焦点、增强型单焦点、多焦点和扩展景深人工晶状体的光学质量比较分析:一种移动模型眼研究。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Jul 3;12(7):5. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.7.5.
通过1.8毫米微小切口同轴超声乳化术和2.75毫米切口标准超声乳化术后手术诱发散光的评估。
Klin Oczna. 2011;113(10-12):314-20.
4
Cataract surgery with bilateral multifocal ReZoom intraocular lens implantation--comparison of 3 and 12 month follow-up.双侧多焦点ReZoom人工晶状体植入的白内障手术——3个月和12个月随访结果比较
Klin Oczna. 2009;111(10-12):327-31.
5
Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons.确定51项美国国立眼科研究所视觉功能问卷的内容领域:来自与视力受损者焦点小组的结果。
Arch Ophthalmol. 1998 Feb;116(2):227-33. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.2.227.