• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纯腹腔镜活体供肝右叶切除术的安全性和风险因素:倾向评分匹配分析与开放技术比较。

Safety and Risk Factors of Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: Comparison to Open Technique in Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2019 Oct;103(10):e308-e316. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002834.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000002834
PMID:31283680
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The innovative pure laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy (LLDRH) procedure for liver transplantation has never been fully compared to open living donor right hepatectomy (OLDRH). We aimed to compare the donor safety and graft results of pure LLDRH to those of OLDRH.

METHODS

From May 2013 to July 2017, 288 consecutive donors underwent either OLDRH (n = 197) or pure LLDRH (n = 91). After propensity score matching, 72 donors were included in each group. The primary outcome was postoperative complications during a 90-day follow-up period. Comprehensive complication index, duration of hospital stay, need for additional pain control, readmission, and donor outcomes were also compared.

RESULTS

The incidence of major complication during the 90-day follow-up was higher in the LLDRH group than the OLDRH group (6.6% vs 15.4%, P = 0.017) but was not statistically significant in propensity-matched analysis (11.1% vs 13.9%, odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-3.51; P = 0.62). A right hepatic duct <1 cm was independently associated with complication in the pure LLDRH group (odds ratio, 4.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-14.99; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In the initial 91 pure LLDRH cases, incidence of major complication was higher than in the OLDRH group, but the difference was not significant in propensity-matched analysis. A right hepatic duct verified as <1 cm may be related to increased frequency of complications in pure LLDRH donors. Further analysis is needed.

摘要

背景

创新的纯腹腔镜活体供肝右半肝切除术(LLDRH)用于肝移植,从未与开放性活体供肝右半肝切除术(OLDRH)完全比较过。我们旨在比较纯 LLDRH 与 OLDRH 的供体安全性和移植物结果。

方法

从 2013 年 5 月至 2017 年 7 月,连续 288 例供体接受了 OLDRH(n = 197)或纯 LLDRH(n = 91)。在进行倾向评分匹配后,每组纳入 72 例供体。主要结局是 90 天随访期间的术后并发症。还比较了综合并发症指数、住院时间、需要额外止痛控制、再次入院和供体结局。

结果

LLDRH 组在 90 天随访期间的主要并发症发生率高于 OLDRH 组(6.6%比 15.4%,P = 0.017),但在倾向评分匹配分析中差异无统计学意义(11.1%比 13.9%,比值比 [OR],1.29;95%置信区间 [CI],0.47-3.51;P = 0.62)。右肝管<1 cm 与纯 LLDRH 组的并发症独立相关(OR,4.01;95%CI,1.08-14.99;P = 0.04)。

结论

在最初的 91 例纯 LLDRH 病例中,主要并发症的发生率高于 OLDRH 组,但在倾向评分匹配分析中差异无统计学意义。证实<1 cm 的右肝管可能与纯 LLDRH 供体并发症的发生频率增加有关。需要进一步分析。

相似文献

1
Safety and Risk Factors of Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: Comparison to Open Technique in Propensity Score-matched Analysis.纯腹腔镜活体供肝右叶切除术的安全性和风险因素:倾向评分匹配分析与开放技术比较。
Transplantation. 2019 Oct;103(10):e308-e316. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002834.
2
One-Year Recipient Morbidity of Liver Transplantation Using Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: Propensity Score Analysis.纯腹腔镜与开腹活体右半肝肝移植受者 1 年发病率的比较:倾向评分分析。
Liver Transpl. 2019 Nov;25(11):1642-1650. doi: 10.1002/lt.25593. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
3
Shorter operation time and improved surgical outcomes in laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy compared with open donor right hepatectomy.与开放性供体右半肝切除术相比,腹腔镜供体右半肝切除术具有更短的手术时间和更好的手术效果。
Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1822-1829. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
4
Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.纯腹腔镜与开腹右半肝活体供肝切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Aug;32(8):832-841. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0583. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
5
Impact of abdominal shape on living liver donor outcomes in mini-incision right hepatic lobectomy: Comparison among 3 techniques.微创右半肝切除术中腹部形状对活体肝移植供者结局的影响:3 种技术的比较。
Liver Transpl. 2018 Apr;24(4):516-527. doi: 10.1002/lt.25001.
6
Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Left Lateral Sectionectomy in Pediatric Transplantation: A Propensity Score Analysis on 220 Consecutive Patients.小儿肝移植中纯腹腔镜供体左外叶切除术:220 例连续患者的倾向评分分析。
Liver Transpl. 2018 Aug;24(8):1019-1030. doi: 10.1002/lt.25043.
7
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between pure laparoscopic surgery and open right hepatectomy in living donor hepatectomy: Propensity score matching analysis.活体肝移植中单纯腹腔镜手术与开腹右半肝切除术围手术期结局的比较:倾向评分匹配分析
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 24;10(1):5314. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62289-0.
8
Comparison of surgical outcomes and learning curve for robotic versus laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy: A retrospective cohort study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜活体供肝肝切除术的手术结果及学习曲线比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2022 Dec;108:107000. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.107000. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
9
Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hepatectomy in Live Liver Donors: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.纯腹腔镜与开腹右半肝切除术在活体肝供者中的应用:倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):e206-e212. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003914.
10
Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy of living donor is feasible and safe: a preliminary comparative study in China.纯腹腔镜活体右半肝切除术在中国是可行和安全的:初步对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4614-4623. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6214-0. Epub 2018 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Donor Hepatectomy.微创供体肝切除术
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Jul-Aug;15(4):102516. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2025.102516. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
2
Understanding the risk factors for surgical morbidities in laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy (LLDH).了解腹腔镜活体供肝肝切除术(LLDH)中手术并发症的危险因素。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Dec 1;13(6):1030-1033. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-24-565. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
3
Chinese guidelines for minimally invasive donor hepatectomy in living donor liver transplantation (2024 edition).
《中国活体肝移植供体微创肝切除术指南(2024年版)》
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Dec 1;13(6):919-936. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-24-329. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
4
Safety and feasibility of pure laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy.单纯腹腔镜活体供体右半肝切除术的安全性和可行性
Updates Surg. 2024 Oct 15. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01920-5.
5
Effect of minimally invasive versus open surgery in hepatectomy on postoperative wound complications in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.微创与开腹手术治疗肝细胞癌患者肝切除术后伤口并发症的效果:Meta 分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4159-4165. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14313. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
6
Impact of pure laparoscopic surgery on bile duct division of living donor left lateral section procurement.单纯腹腔镜手术对活体供体左外侧叶切取术中胆管离断的影响
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2023 Jun 1;12(3):328-340. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-21-418. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
7
Safely Implementing a Program of Pure Laparoscopic Donor Right Hepatectomy: The Experience From a Southeast Asian Center.安全实施纯腹腔镜供体右半肝切除术方案:来自东南亚某中心的经验
Transplant Direct. 2023 May 24;9(6):e1486. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001486. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Minimally Invasive Donors Right Hepatectomy versus Open Donors Right Hepatectomy: A Meta-Analysis.微创供体右半肝切除术与开放供体右半肝切除术:一项Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 17;12(8):2904. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082904.
9
A novel approach of intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy in living donor liver transplantation.一种新的术中胆道造影方法在活体肝左外叶切除术供肝移植术中的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4974-4981. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10066-1. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
10
Postoperative Health Status and Quality of Life After Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomy for Living Donor Liver Transplantation.活体肝移植中纯腹腔镜供肝切除术的术后健康状况和生活质量。
Ann Transplant. 2022 Apr 26;27:e935611. doi: 10.12659/AOT.935611.