Suppr超能文献

对在南非农村使用单独访谈青少年-老年照顾者对子的伦理和方法学挑战的反思。

A reflection on ethical and methodological challenges of using separate interviews with adolescent-older carer dyads in rural South Africa.

机构信息

Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.

School of Applied Human Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jul 8;20(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0383-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This article discusses our reflections on ethical and methodological challenges when conducting separate interviews with individuals in dyads in the uMkhanyakude district, South Africa. Our work is embedded in an ethnographic study exploring care relationships between adolescents and their older carers in the context of a large-donor funded HIV programme. We use these reflections to discuss some of the challenges and present possible management strategies that may be adopted in conducting dyadic health research in resource-poor settings.

METHODS

Drawing from the relational agency, three rounds of separate interviews and participant observation were undertaken with dyads of adolescents aged between 13 and 19 and their older carers aged 50+ from October 2017 to September 2018. A reflexive journal was kept to record the interviewer's experiences of the whole research process. We identified methodological and ethical challenges from these data during the thematic analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 36 separate interviews were conducted with six pairs of adolescent-older carer dyads (n = 12 participants). Five themes emerged: recruitment of dyads, consenting dyads, confidentiality, conducting separate interviews with adolescents and older carers, and interviewer-dyad interaction. We also illustrated how we dealt with these challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study can guide the recruitment, consenting and collecting data for health studies that employ a similar form of enquiry in LMICs. However, ethical and methodological challenges should be recognised as features of the relationships between cross-generation dyads rather than weaknesses of the method.

摘要

背景

本文讨论了我们在南非乌姆坎夸德地区对个体在对偶关系中进行单独访谈时所遇到的伦理和方法学挑战的反思。我们的工作是嵌入在一项民族志研究中的,该研究探讨了在一个大型捐赠者资助的艾滋病毒项目背景下,青少年与其年长照顾者之间的照顾关系。我们利用这些反思来讨论在资源匮乏环境中进行对偶健康研究可能面临的一些挑战,并提出可能的管理策略。

方法

从关系代理的角度出发,我们在 2017 年 10 月至 2018 年 9 月期间对乌姆坎夸德地区年龄在 13 至 19 岁之间的青少年及其 50 岁以上的年长照顾者进行了三轮单独访谈和参与式观察。研究人员保留了一份反思日志,记录访谈者在整个研究过程中的经验。我们从这些数据中进行主题分析,确定了方法学和伦理方面的挑战。

结果

共对六对青少年-年长照顾者对偶关系进行了 36 次单独访谈(n=12 名参与者)。出现了五个主题:对偶关系的招募、对偶关系的同意、保密性、对青少年和年长照顾者进行单独访谈以及访谈者-对偶关系的互动。我们还举例说明了如何处理这些挑战。

结论

本研究的结果可以为在 LMIC 中采用类似形式调查的健康研究的招募、同意和数据收集提供指导。然而,应该认识到,这些挑战是跨代对偶关系中关系的特征,而不是方法的弱点。

相似文献

2
How Not to Let Secrets Out When Conducting Qualitative Research With Dyads.
Qual Health Res. 2016 May;26(6):807-15. doi: 10.1177/1049732315627427. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
3
Stakeholder perspectives on ethical challenges in HIV vaccine trials in South Africa.
Dev World Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(1):11-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00254.x.
5
Confidentiality in participatory research: Challenges from one study.
Nurs Ethics. 2016 Jun;23(4):442-54. doi: 10.1177/0969733014564909. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
8
Is my mum going to hear this? Methodological and ethical challenges in qualitative health research with young people.
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec;69(11):1691-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
10
Unstructured interviews: challenges when participants have a major depressive illness.
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Aug;39(3):266-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02273.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical Aspects of Involving Adolescents in HIV Research: A Systematic Review of the Empiric Literature.
J Pediatr. 2023 Nov;262:113589. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113589. Epub 2023 Jul 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethics of research methodology requires a methodology of research ethics.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;100:v-vi. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.07.001.
2
Being an 'adolescent': The consequences of gendered risks for young people in rural Uganda.
Childhood. 2018 Feb;25(1):19-33. doi: 10.1177/0907568217732119. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
3
"How Do We Start? And How Will They React?" Disclosing to Young People with Perinatally Acquired HIV in Uganda.
Front Public Health. 2017 Dec 13;5:343. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00343. eCollection 2017.
4
Autonomy and couples' joint decision-making in healthcare.
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jan 11;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0241-6.
5
Conducting Joint Interviews With Couples: Ethical and Methodological Challenges.
Qual Health Res. 2018 Apr;28(5):844-854. doi: 10.1177/1049732317749196. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Management of Adolescent-Parent Dyads' Discordance for Willingness to Participate in a Reproductive Health Clinical Trial.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Feb;13(1):42-49. doi: 10.1177/1556264617745409. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
7
Ethical considerations when conducting joint interviews with close relatives or family: an integrative review.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Jun;32(2):515-526. doi: 10.1111/scs.12535. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
9
Rethinking the family in the context of care for adolescents living with HIV in Swaziland.
AIDS Care. 2016;28 Suppl 4:8-17. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1195482. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
10
How Not to Let Secrets Out When Conducting Qualitative Research With Dyads.
Qual Health Res. 2016 May;26(6):807-15. doi: 10.1177/1049732315627427. Epub 2016 Feb 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验