• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对在南非农村使用单独访谈青少年-老年照顾者对子的伦理和方法学挑战的反思。

A reflection on ethical and methodological challenges of using separate interviews with adolescent-older carer dyads in rural South Africa.

机构信息

Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.

School of Applied Human Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jul 8;20(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0383-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-019-0383-9
PMID:31286952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6615300/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This article discusses our reflections on ethical and methodological challenges when conducting separate interviews with individuals in dyads in the uMkhanyakude district, South Africa. Our work is embedded in an ethnographic study exploring care relationships between adolescents and their older carers in the context of a large-donor funded HIV programme. We use these reflections to discuss some of the challenges and present possible management strategies that may be adopted in conducting dyadic health research in resource-poor settings.

METHODS

Drawing from the relational agency, three rounds of separate interviews and participant observation were undertaken with dyads of adolescents aged between 13 and 19 and their older carers aged 50+ from October 2017 to September 2018. A reflexive journal was kept to record the interviewer's experiences of the whole research process. We identified methodological and ethical challenges from these data during the thematic analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 36 separate interviews were conducted with six pairs of adolescent-older carer dyads (n = 12 participants). Five themes emerged: recruitment of dyads, consenting dyads, confidentiality, conducting separate interviews with adolescents and older carers, and interviewer-dyad interaction. We also illustrated how we dealt with these challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study can guide the recruitment, consenting and collecting data for health studies that employ a similar form of enquiry in LMICs. However, ethical and methodological challenges should be recognised as features of the relationships between cross-generation dyads rather than weaknesses of the method.

摘要

背景

本文讨论了我们在南非乌姆坎夸德地区对个体在对偶关系中进行单独访谈时所遇到的伦理和方法学挑战的反思。我们的工作是嵌入在一项民族志研究中的,该研究探讨了在一个大型捐赠者资助的艾滋病毒项目背景下,青少年与其年长照顾者之间的照顾关系。我们利用这些反思来讨论在资源匮乏环境中进行对偶健康研究可能面临的一些挑战,并提出可能的管理策略。

方法

从关系代理的角度出发,我们在 2017 年 10 月至 2018 年 9 月期间对乌姆坎夸德地区年龄在 13 至 19 岁之间的青少年及其 50 岁以上的年长照顾者进行了三轮单独访谈和参与式观察。研究人员保留了一份反思日志,记录访谈者在整个研究过程中的经验。我们从这些数据中进行主题分析,确定了方法学和伦理方面的挑战。

结果

共对六对青少年-年长照顾者对偶关系进行了 36 次单独访谈(n=12 名参与者)。出现了五个主题:对偶关系的招募、对偶关系的同意、保密性、对青少年和年长照顾者进行单独访谈以及访谈者-对偶关系的互动。我们还举例说明了如何处理这些挑战。

结论

本研究的结果可以为在 LMIC 中采用类似形式调查的健康研究的招募、同意和数据收集提供指导。然而,应该认识到,这些挑战是跨代对偶关系中关系的特征,而不是方法的弱点。

相似文献

1
A reflection on ethical and methodological challenges of using separate interviews with adolescent-older carer dyads in rural South Africa.对在南非农村使用单独访谈青少年-老年照顾者对子的伦理和方法学挑战的反思。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jul 8;20(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0383-9.
2
How Not to Let Secrets Out When Conducting Qualitative Research With Dyads.在对二元组进行定性研究时如何避免泄露机密。
Qual Health Res. 2016 May;26(6):807-15. doi: 10.1177/1049732315627427. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
3
Stakeholder perspectives on ethical challenges in HIV vaccine trials in South Africa.利益相关者对南非艾滋病毒疫苗试验中伦理挑战的看法。
Dev World Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(1):11-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00254.x.
4
"I passed the test!" Evidence of diagnostic misconception in the recruitment of population controls for an H3Africa genomic study in Cape Town, South Africa.“我通过了测试!” 南非开普敦一项H3Africa基因组研究中人群对照招募方面的诊断错误观念证据。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Feb 15;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0175-z.
5
Confidentiality in participatory research: Challenges from one study.参与式研究中的保密性:一项研究带来的挑战
Nurs Ethics. 2016 Jun;23(4):442-54. doi: 10.1177/0969733014564909. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
6
Convergent ethical issues in HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria vaccine trials in Africa: Report from the WHO/UNAIDS African AIDS Vaccine Programme's Ethics, Law and Human Rights Collaborating Centre consultation, 10-11 February 2009, Durban, South Africa.非洲艾滋病毒/艾滋病、结核病和疟疾疫苗试验中的趋同伦理问题:世界卫生组织/艾滋病规划署非洲艾滋病疫苗方案的伦理、法律和人权合作中心协商会议报告,2009 年 2 月 10 日至 11 日,南非德班。
BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Mar 9;11:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-3.
7
A reflection on the challenge of protecting confidentiality of participants while disseminating research results locally.关于在本地传播研究结果的同时保护参与者隐私这一挑战的思考。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jun 15;19(Suppl 1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0279-0.
8
Is my mum going to hear this? Methodological and ethical challenges in qualitative health research with young people.我妈妈会听到这个吗?针对年轻人的定性健康研究中的方法学和伦理挑战。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec;69(11):1691-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
9
Synergies, tensions and challenges in HIV prevention, treatment and cure research: exploratory conversations with HIV experts in South Africa.艾滋病病毒预防、治疗和治愈研究中的协同作用、紧张关系与挑战:与南非艾滋病病毒专家的探索性对话
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Apr 30;17(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0109-1.
10
Unstructured interviews: challenges when participants have a major depressive illness.非结构化访谈:参与者患有重度抑郁症时面临的挑战。
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Aug;39(3):266-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02273.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical Aspects of Involving Adolescents in HIV Research: A Systematic Review of the Empiric Literature.涉及青少年参与 HIV 研究的伦理问题:实证文献的系统综述。
J Pediatr. 2023 Nov;262:113589. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113589. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
2
Community attitudes and gendered influences on decision making around contraceptive implant use in rural Papua New Guinea.巴布亚新几内亚农村地区社区态度及性别因素对避孕植入剂使用决策的影响
Reprod Health. 2020 Sep 5;17(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00985-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethics of research methodology requires a methodology of research ethics.研究方法的伦理需要一种研究伦理的方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;100:v-vi. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.07.001.
2
Being an 'adolescent': The consequences of gendered risks for young people in rural Uganda.作为一名“青少年”:乌干达农村地区年轻人面临的性别风险后果。
Childhood. 2018 Feb;25(1):19-33. doi: 10.1177/0907568217732119. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
3
"How Do We Start? And How Will They React?" Disclosing to Young People with Perinatally Acquired HIV in Uganda.“我们如何开始?他们会作何反应?”向乌干达围产期感染艾滋病毒的年轻人披露病情
Front Public Health. 2017 Dec 13;5:343. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00343. eCollection 2017.
4
Autonomy and couples' joint decision-making in healthcare.医疗保健中的自主性与夫妻共同决策
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jan 11;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0241-6.
5
Conducting Joint Interviews With Couples: Ethical and Methodological Challenges.与夫妻进行联合访谈:伦理和方法学挑战。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Apr;28(5):844-854. doi: 10.1177/1049732317749196. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Management of Adolescent-Parent Dyads' Discordance for Willingness to Participate in a Reproductive Health Clinical Trial.青少年-父母二元组参与生殖健康临床试验意愿不一致的管理
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Feb;13(1):42-49. doi: 10.1177/1556264617745409. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
7
Ethical considerations when conducting joint interviews with close relatives or family: an integrative review.与近亲或家人进行联合访谈时的伦理考量:一项综合综述。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Jun;32(2):515-526. doi: 10.1111/scs.12535. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
8
Perceptions of diet, physical activity, and obesity-related health among black daughter-mother pairs in Soweto, South Africa: a qualitative study.南非索韦托黑人母女对饮食、身体活动及肥胖相关健康的认知:一项定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 9;16:750. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3436-8.
9
Rethinking the family in the context of care for adolescents living with HIV in Swaziland.在斯威士兰为感染艾滋病毒的青少年提供护理的背景下重新思考家庭。
AIDS Care. 2016;28 Suppl 4:8-17. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1195482. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
10
How Not to Let Secrets Out When Conducting Qualitative Research With Dyads.在对二元组进行定性研究时如何避免泄露机密。
Qual Health Res. 2016 May;26(6):807-15. doi: 10.1177/1049732315627427. Epub 2016 Feb 17.