Voltelen Barbara, Konradsen Hanne, Østergaard Birte
Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Nursing Education and Health Sciences Research Center, University College Lillebaelt, Vejle, Denmark.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Jun;32(2):515-526. doi: 10.1111/scs.12535. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
Researchers are obligated to do no harm to participants of research. Conflicts in relationships can cause negative well-being; therefore, insight is needed into the particular ethical considerations that arise when conducting joint interviews with close relatives or family members simultaneously in the healthcare setting.
To collect and share knowledge related to ethical considerations conducting joint interviews.
A literature review inspired by the integrative review method was performed. Data were retrieved through a structured search in PubMed, CINAHL and the Philosopher's Index and Academic Search Premier for articles published in English from 1980 to 2016 and included 18 articles, of a possible 2153. Article content was assessed line-by-line, and ethical considerations were extracted and organized in three subgroups regarding: Planning joint interviews; Conduction joint interviews and Reporting on joint interviews Findings: Participants should be offered the best terms for a constructive, on-going relationship after the joint interview has ended. This obligates the researcher to ensure a safe environment during the joint interview and create a delicate balance between the needs of the participants, using nonconfrontational techniques that foster equal and neutral but dedicated attention to all parties, before, during and after the joint interviews.
Specific ethical considerations should be taken into account before, during and after joint interviewing. Further research is needed before a final conclusion can be drawn.
研究人员有责任不对研究参与者造成伤害。人际关系中的冲突会导致负面的幸福感；因此，需要深入了解在医疗环境中同时与近亲或家庭成员进行联合访谈时出现的特殊伦理考量。
收集并分享与联合访谈伦理考量相关的知识。
采用受整合性综述方法启发的文献综述。通过在PubMed、CINAHL、《哲学家索引》和《学术搜索大全》中进行结构化检索，获取1980年至2016年以英文发表的文章，在可能的2153篇文章中纳入了18篇。逐行评估文章内容，并提取伦理考量因素，按照以下三个子类别进行组织：联合访谈的规划；联合访谈的实施；联合访谈结果的报告。
在联合访谈结束后，应为参与者提供建立建设性持续关系的最佳条件。这要求研究人员在联合访谈期间确保安全的环境，并在联合访谈之前、期间和之后，运用非对抗性技巧，在参与者的需求之间建立微妙的平衡，以促进对所有各方的平等、中立且专注的关注。
在联合访谈之前、期间和之后，应考虑特定的伦理考量因素。在得出最终结论之前，还需要进一步研究。
