Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Methodology and Statistics, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nutr Neurosci. 2021 May;24(5):395-405. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2019.1639306. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
The brain plays an important regulatory role in directing energy homeostasis and eating behavior. The increased ingestion of sugars and sweeteners over the last decades makes investigating the effects of these substances on the regulatory function of the brain of particular interest. We investigated whole brain functional response to the ingestion of nutrient shakes sweetened with either the nutritive natural sugars glucose and fructose, the low- nutritive natural sugar replacement allulose or the non-nutritive artificial sweetener sucralose.
Twenty healthy, normal weight, adult males underwent functional MRI on four separate visits. In a double-blind randomized study setup, participants received shakes sweetened with glucose, fructose, allulose or sucralose. Resting state functional MRI was performed before and after ingestion. Changes in Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) signal, functional network connectivity and voxel based connectivity by Eigenvector Centrality Mapping (ECM) were measured.
Glucose and fructose led to significant decreased BOLD signal in the cingulate cortex, insula and the basal ganglia. Glucose led to a significant increase in eigen vector centrality throughout the brain and a significant decrease in eigen vector centrality in the midbrain. Sucralose and allulose had no effect on BOLD signal or network connectivity but sucralose did lead to a significant increase in eigen vector centrality values in the cingulate cortex, central gyri and temporal lobe.
Taken together our findings show that even in a shake containing fat and protein, the type of sweetener can affect brain responses and might thus affect reward and satiety responses and feeding behavior. The sweet taste without the corresponding energy content of the non-nutritive sweeteners appeared to have only small effects on the brain. Indicating that the while ingestion of nutritive sugars could have a strong effect on feeding behavior, both in a satiety aspect as well as rewarding aspects, non-nutritive sweeteners appear to not have these effects.
This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov under number NCT02745730.
大脑在调节能量平衡和进食行为方面起着重要的调节作用。在过去几十年中,人们摄入的糖和甜味剂越来越多,因此研究这些物质对大脑调节功能的影响尤其具有意义。我们研究了全脑对营养奶昔摄入的功能反应,这些奶昔分别用营养天然糖葡萄糖和果糖、低营养天然糖替代品阿洛酮糖或非营养人工甜味剂三氯蔗糖进行了调味。
20 名健康、体重正常的成年男性在 4 次不同的访问中接受了功能磁共振成像检查。在一项双盲随机研究中,参与者接受了用葡萄糖、果糖、阿洛酮糖或三氯蔗糖调味的奶昔。在摄入前后进行静息态功能磁共振成像。通过特征向量中心度映射(Eigenvector Centrality Mapping,ECM)测量血氧水平依赖(Blood Oxygen Level Dependent,BOLD)信号、功能网络连接和体素连接的变化。
葡萄糖和果糖导致扣带回皮质、岛叶和基底节的 BOLD 信号显著降低。葡萄糖导致大脑各处的特征向量中心度显著增加,中脑的特征向量中心度显著降低。三氯蔗糖和阿洛酮糖对 BOLD 信号或网络连接没有影响,但三氯蔗糖导致扣带回皮质、中央回和颞叶的特征向量中心度值显著增加。
总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,即使在含有脂肪和蛋白质的奶昔中,甜味剂的类型也会影响大脑的反应,从而可能影响奖励和饱腹感反应以及进食行为。非营养性甜味剂的甜味而没有相应的能量含量似乎对大脑只有很小的影响。这表明,虽然营养性糖的摄入可能对进食行为有很强的影响,无论是在饱腹感方面还是在奖励方面,非营养性甜味剂似乎没有这些影响。
本研究在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,注册号为 NCT02745730。