Suppr超能文献

研究方案:验证一种新的人工耳蜗植入患者报告的听力努力测量工具(PROM):听力努力问卷-人工耳蜗(LEQ-CI)。

Study protocol for the validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) of listening effort in cochlear implantation: the Listening Effort Questionnaire-Cochlear Implant (LEQ-CI).

机构信息

Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

South Wales Cochlear Implant Programme, Bridgend, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e028881. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028881.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Listening effort may be defined as the cognitive resources needed to understand an auditory message. A sustained requirement for listening effort is known to have a negative impact on individuals' sense of social connectedness, well-being and quality of life. A number of hearing-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) exist currently; however, none adequately assess listening effort as it is experienced in the listening situations of everyday life. The Listening Effort Questionnaire-Cochlear Implant (LEQ-CI) is a new, hearing-specific PROM designed to assess perceived listening effort as experienced by adult CI patients. It is the aim of this study to conduct the first psychometric evaluation of the LEQ-CI's measurement properties.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a phased, prospective, multi-site validation study in a UK population of adults with severe-profound sensorineural hearing loss who meet local candidacy criteria for CI. In phase 1, 250 CI patients from four National Health Service CI centres will self-complete a paper version of the LEQ-CI. Factor analysis will establish unidimensionality and Rasch analysis will evaluate item fit, differential item functioning, response scale ordering, targeting of persons and items, and reliability. Classical test theory methods will assess acceptability/data completeness, scaling assumptions, targeting and internal consistency reliability. Phase 1 results will inform refinements to the LEQ-CI. In phase 2, a new sample of adult CI patients (n=100) will self-complete the refined LEQ-CI, the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale, the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire and the Fatigue Assessment Scale to assess construct validity.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board/Swansea University Joint Study Review Committee and the Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee, Ref: 18/NE/0320. Dissemination will be in high-quality journals, conference presentations and SEH's doctoral dissertation.

摘要

简介

听力努力可被定义为理解听觉信息所需的认知资源。已知持续的听力努力需求会对个体的社交联系感、幸福感和生活质量产生负面影响。目前存在许多针对听力的患者报告结局测量(PROM);然而,没有任何一种方法能够充分评估日常生活中听力体验所涉及的听力努力。听力努力问卷-人工耳蜗(LEQ-CI)是一种新的、针对听力的 PROM,旨在评估成人人工耳蜗患者所经历的感知听力努力。本研究旨在对 LEQ-CI 的测量特性进行首次心理测量评估。

方法与分析

这是一项在英国重度-极重度感音神经性听力损失患者中进行的、分阶段、前瞻性、多中心验证研究,这些患者符合当地人工耳蜗候选标准。在第 1 阶段,来自四个国家卫生服务人工耳蜗中心的 250 名人工耳蜗患者将自行填写 LEQ-CI 的纸质版本。因子分析将确定单维性,而 Rasch 分析将评估项目拟合度、差异项目功能、反应量表排序、人员和项目的针对性以及可靠性。经典测试理论方法将评估可接受性/数据完整性、定标假设、针对性和内部一致性可靠性。第 1 阶段的结果将为 LEQ-CI 的改进提供信息。在第 2 阶段,将有新的人工耳蜗患者样本(n=100)自行填写改进后的 LEQ-CI、言语、空间和听力质量量表、尼姆斯人工耳蜗植入问卷和疲劳评估量表,以评估结构效度。

伦理与传播

该研究已获得阿伯塔威·摩根大学健康委员会/斯旺西大学联合研究审查委员会和纽卡斯尔和北泰恩赛德 2 号研究伦理委员会的批准,注册号为 18/NE/0320。传播将通过高质量期刊、会议演讲和 SEH 的博士论文进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6fb/6629460/3250e6683ca7/bmjopen-2018-028881f01.jpg

相似文献

2
Rasch Analysis of the Listening Effort Questionnaire-Cochlear Implant.
Ear Hear. 2021;42(6):1699-1711. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001059.
4
Listening-Related Fatigue in New and Experienced Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Ear Hear. 2024;45(4):929-944. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001488. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
8
Development of the hearing-related quality of life questionnaire for auditory-visual, cognitive and psychosocial functioning (hAVICOP).
J Commun Disord. 2023 Jan-Feb;101:106291. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106291. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Italian adaptation of Listening Effort Assessment Scale and Fatigue Assessment Scale questionnaires.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2025 Jun;45(3):207-216. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2826.
3
Listening effort and fatigue among cochlear implant users: a scoping review.
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 3;14:1278508. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1278508. eCollection 2023.
4
Speech Recognition and Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Recipients and Normal-Hearing Listeners.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Feb 10;15:725412. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.725412. eCollection 2021.
5
The Listening Network and Cochlear Implant Benefits in Hearing-Impaired Adults.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Feb 25;13:589296. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.589296. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Measures of Listening Effort Are Multidimensional.
Ear Hear. 2019 Sep/Oct;40(5):1084-1097. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000697.
2
Using Rasch Analysis to Examine the Item-Level Psychometrics of the .
Speech Lang Hear. 2017;20(3):130-143. doi: 10.1080/2050571X.2016.1243747. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
4
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
6
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
7
Hearing Handicap and Speech Recognition Correlate With Self-Reported Listening Effort and Fatigue.
Ear Hear. 2018 May/Jun;39(3):470-474. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000515.
8
Listening Effort: How the Cognitive Consequences of Acoustic Challenge Are Reflected in Brain and Behavior.
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):204-214. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000494.
9
Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517706396. doi: 10.1177/2331216517706396.
10
Global hearing health care: new findings and perspectives.
Lancet. 2017 Dec 2;390(10111):2503-2515. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31073-5. Epub 2017 Jul 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验