Karen M. Jennings, PhD, RN, PMHNP-BC, University of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, USA.
Lindsay P. Bodell, PhD, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2021 May-Jun;27(3):231-239. doi: 10.1177/1078390319862029. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
Efforts to examine alternative classifications (e.g., personality) of anorexia nervosa (AN) using empirical techniques are crucial to elucidate diverse symptom presentations, personality traits, and psychiatric comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to use an empirical approach (mixture modeling) to test an alternative classification of AN as categorical, dimensional, or hybrid categorical-dimensional construct based on the co-occurrence of personality psychopathology and eating disorder clinical presentation. Patients with AN ( = 194) completed interviews and questionnaires at treatment admission and 3-month follow-up. Mixture modeling was used to test whether indicators best classified AN as categorical, dimensional, or hybrid. A four-latent class, one-latent dimension mixture model that was variant across groups provided the best fit to the data. Results suggest that all classes were characterized by low self-esteem and self-harming and suicidality tendencies. Individuals assigned to Latent Class 2 (LC2; = 21) had a greater tendency toward being impulsive and easily angered and having difficulties controlling anger compared with those in LC1 ( = 84) and LC3 ( = 66). Moreover, individuals assigned to LC1 and LC3 were more likely to have a poor outcome from intensive treatment compared with those in LC4 ( = 21). Findings indicate that the dimensional aspect within each class measured frequency of specific eating disorder behaviors but did not predict treatment outcomes. These results emphasize the complexity of AN and the importance of considering how facets of clinical presentation beyond eating disorder behaviors may have different treatment and prognostic implications.
使用实证技术研究神经性厌食症(AN)的替代分类(例如人格)的努力对于阐明不同的症状表现、人格特质和精神共病至关重要。本研究的目的是使用实证方法(混合建模)根据人格病理和饮食障碍临床表现的共同发生来测试 AN 的替代分类,即分类、维度或混合分类-维度结构。194 名 AN 患者在治疗入院和 3 个月随访时完成了访谈和问卷调查。混合建模用于测试指标是否最好将 AN 分类为分类、维度或混合。跨组变异的四潜在类别、一潜在维度混合模型提供了数据的最佳拟合。结果表明,所有类别都以低自尊和自我伤害和自杀倾向为特征。与 LC1(n=84)和 LC3(n=66)相比,被分配到潜在类别 2(LC2;n=21)的个体更容易冲动、易怒和难以控制愤怒。此外,与 LC4(n=21)相比,被分配到 LC1 和 LC3 的个体更有可能从强化治疗中获得不良结果。研究结果表明,每个类别内的维度方面测量了特定饮食障碍行为的频率,但不能预测治疗结果。这些结果强调了 AN 的复杂性,以及考虑超越饮食障碍行为的临床表现特征如何可能具有不同的治疗和预后意义的重要性。