School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1377, Launceston, Tasmania, 7250, Australia.
BMC Psychol. 2019 Jul 10;7(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40359-019-0318-8.
A taxonomy of the objects of study, theory, assessment, and intervention is critical to the development of all clinical sciences. Clinical psychology has been conceptually and administratively dominated by the taxonomy of an adjacent discipline - psychiatry's Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM). Many have called for a 'paradigm shift' away from a medical nosology of diseases toward clinical psychology's own taxonomy of clinical psychological problems (CPPs), without being able to specify what is to be listed and classified.
An examination of DSM's problems for clinical psychology, especially its lack of clinical utility, and a search for the essence of CPPs in what clinical psychologists actually do, leads to the proposal that: The critical psychological-level phenomenon underlying CPPs is the occurrence of 'problem-maintaining circles' (PMCs) of causally related cognitions, emotions, behaviours, and/or stimuli. This concept provides an empirically-derived, theory-based, treatment-relevant, categorical, essentialist, parsimonious, and nonstigmatizing definition of CPPs. It distinguishes psychological problems in which PMCs have not (yet?) formed, and which may respond to 'counseling', clinical psychological problems in which active PMCs require clinical intervention, and psychopathological problems which are unlikely to be 'cured' by PMC-breaking alone.
A subsequent classification and coding system of PMCs is proposed, and expected benefits to research, communication, and the quality of case formulation in clinical psychology are described, reliant upon a development effort of some meaningful fraction of that which has been devoted to the DSM.
对研究对象、理论、评估和干预措施的分类是所有临床科学发展的关键。临床心理学在概念上和管理上都受到邻近学科精神病学的诊断和统计手册精神障碍(DSM)的分类的支配。许多人呼吁从疾病的医学分类学向临床心理学自己的临床心理问题(CPPs)分类学“范式转变”,但无法具体说明要列出和分类的内容。
检查 DSM 对临床心理学的问题,特别是其缺乏临床实用性,并寻找临床心理学家实际所做的 CPPs 的本质,导致提出以下观点:CPPs 所依据的关键心理水平现象是“问题维持循环”(PMCs)的发生,其涉及因果相关的认知、情感、行为和/或刺激。这一概念提供了一个基于经验、基于理论、与治疗相关、分类的、本质主义的、简约的、非污名化的 CPPs 定义。它区分了尚未形成 PMC 的心理问题(可能对“咨询”有反应)、需要临床干预的活跃 PMC 临床心理问题,以及不太可能仅通过打破 PMC 来“治愈”的心理病理学问题。
随后提出了一个 PMC 的分类和编码系统,并描述了它对临床心理学研究、沟通和案例制定质量的预期益处,这依赖于对 DSM 所投入的有意义的部分发展努力。