• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同程度拒绝后的社交焦虑和亲社会行为:一种新实验范式的初步试验

Social Anxiety and Pro-social Behavior Following Varying Degrees of Rejection: Piloting a New Experimental Paradigm.

作者信息

Weerdmeester Joanneke, Lange Wolf-Gero

机构信息

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 21;10:1325. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01325. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01325
PMID:31293469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6603339/
Abstract

In general, human beings tend to try and reconnect after they have been socially rejected. It is not clear, however, which role the number of rejecters and rejection sensitivity plays. In addition, it is unclear whether the supposed pro-social behaviors are aimed at the rejecters or at innocent individuals. By means of a new paradigm, the present pilot study investigated compensatory behavior of individuals with varying degrees of social anxiety, following varying degrees of rejection. In addition, it was explored toward whom their behavior was directed: rejecters or innocent individuals. Female students ( = 34) were assessed on their degree of social anxiety and then, based on a personal profile they wrote, they were either rejected by 1, 2, or 3 fictional other participants or completely accepted. Afterward, the participants had to explicitly rate the creativity of drawings made by the others and, in a pro-social reward paradigm, awarded the other participants money based on their creativity rating. In addition, implicit social approach tendencies toward photos of rejecters, acceptors, or innocent individuals were assessed by means of an approach-avoidance task. The results confirmed that people with a low degree of social anxiety respond to rejection in a compensatory pro-social manner explicitly as well as implicitly, but that people with a high degree of social anxiety fail to do so. With regard to sources of rejection, only implicit approach-avoidance tendencies reflected a distinction between rejecters and innocent individuals. Theoretical implications are discussed in the light of the small sample size and other limitations.

摘要

一般来说,人类在经历社会排斥后往往会试图重新建立联系。然而,尚不清楚排斥者的数量和排斥敏感性起到了何种作用。此外,也不清楚所假定的亲社会行为是针对排斥者还是无辜个体。通过一种新的范式,本初步研究调查了不同程度社交焦虑的个体在经历不同程度的排斥后的补偿行为。此外,还探究了他们的行为是针对谁:排斥者还是无辜个体。对34名女学生的社交焦虑程度进行了评估,然后根据她们所写的个人简介,她们要么被1名、2名或3名虚构的其他参与者排斥,要么被完全接受。之后,参与者必须明确评价其他人所画图画的创造力,并在亲社会奖励范式中,根据他们的创造力评价给其他参与者金钱奖励。此外,通过趋近-回避任务评估了对排斥者、接受者或无辜个体照片的内隐社交趋近倾向。结果证实,社交焦虑程度低的人会以明确和内隐的补偿性亲社会方式对排斥做出反应,但社交焦虑程度高的人则不会。关于排斥的来源,只有内隐趋近-回避倾向反映出排斥者和无辜个体之间的区别。鉴于样本量小和其他局限性,对理论意义进行了讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/6603339/4c69dd6cbd38/fpsyg-10-01325-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/6603339/5d93d98ad172/fpsyg-10-01325-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/6603339/f7dd65648a7e/fpsyg-10-01325-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/6603339/4c69dd6cbd38/fpsyg-10-01325-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/6603339/5d93d98ad172/fpsyg-10-01325-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/6603339/f7dd65648a7e/fpsyg-10-01325-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2d/6603339/4c69dd6cbd38/fpsyg-10-01325-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Social Anxiety and Pro-social Behavior Following Varying Degrees of Rejection: Piloting a New Experimental Paradigm.不同程度拒绝后的社交焦虑和亲社会行为:一种新实验范式的初步试验
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 21;10:1325. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01325. eCollection 2019.
2
Anger suppression after imagined rejection among individuals with social anxiety.社交焦虑个体在想象被拒绝后的愤怒抑制。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Oct;25(7):879-87. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.04.009. Epub 2011 May 5.
3
Effects of rejection intensity and rejection sensitivity on social approach behavior in women.排斥强度和排斥敏感性对女性社会接近行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 17;15(1):e0227799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227799. eCollection 2020.
4
Compensatory deficits following rejection: the role of social anxiety in disrupting affiliative behavior.排斥后的补偿性缺陷:社交焦虑在破坏亲和行为中的作用。
Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(5):438-46. doi: 10.1002/da.20555.
5
Understanding Rejection between First-and-Second-Grade Elementary Students through Reasons Expressed by Rejecters.通过拒绝者表达的原因来理解小学一、二年级学生之间的排斥行为。
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 4;8:462. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00462. eCollection 2017.
6
Low tacrolimus concentrations and increased risk of early acute rejection in adult renal transplantation.成人肾移植中他克莫司浓度低与早期急性排斥反应风险增加
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001 Sep;16(9):1905-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/16.9.1905.
7
Anticipation of Social Interaction Changes Implicit Approach-Avoidance Behavior of Socially Anxious Individuals.对社交互动变化的预期会改变社交焦虑个体的内隐趋近-回避行为。
Cognit Ther Res. 2012 Dec;36(6):740-749. doi: 10.1007/s10608-011-9408-5. Epub 2011 Oct 30.
8
How Does the Source of Rejection Perceive Innocent Victims?拒绝的源头如何看待无辜的受害者?
J Soc Psychol. 2015;155(5):515-26. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2015.1061972.
9
Socially Anxious Tendencies Affect Impressions of Others' Positive and Negative Emotional Gazes.社交焦虑倾向会影响对他人积极和消极情绪注视的印象。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 1;9:2111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02111. eCollection 2018.
10
Aggressive behavior after social exclusion is linked with the spontaneous initiation of more action-oriented coping immediately following the exclusion episode.社会排斥后的攻击性行为与在排斥事件发生后立即自发启动更多以行动为导向的应对方式有关。
Physiol Behav. 2018 Oct 15;195:142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Partner gaze shapes the relationship between symptoms of psychopathology and interpersonal coordination.伴侣注视影响精神病理学症状和人际协调之间的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 21;14(1):14288. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65139-5.
2
Assessing the relationship between early maladaptive schemas and interpersonal problems using interpersonal scenarios depicting rejection.使用描述拒绝的人际场景评估早期适应不良模式与人际问题之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 24;18(10):e0288543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288543. eCollection 2023.
3
Parental Psychological Control and Children's Prosocial Behavior: The Mediating Role of Social Anxiety and the Moderating Role of Socioeconomic Status.

本文引用的文献

1
Social exclusion leads to attentional bias to emotional social information: Evidence from eye movement.社会排斥导致对情绪化社交信息的注意偏向:来自眼动的证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 17;12(10):e0186313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186313. eCollection 2017.
2
Gender differences in social anxiety disorder: A review.性别差异与社交焦虑障碍:综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Aug;56:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 30.
3
Correlates of Social Exclusion in Social Anxiety Disorder: An fMRI study.社交焦虑障碍中社会排斥的相关性:一项 fMRI 研究。
父母心理控制与儿童亲社会行为:社会焦虑的中介作用和社会经济地位的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;19(18):11691. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811691.
4
Testing effects of social rejection on aggressive and prosocial behavior: A meta-analysis.测试社会排斥对攻击和亲社会行为的影响:一项元分析。
Aggress Behav. 2022 Nov;48(6):529-545. doi: 10.1002/ab.22026. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
5
Attachment security predicts adolescents' prosocial and health protective responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.依附关系安全性可预测青少年对 COVID-19 大流行的亲社会和健康保护反应。
Child Dev. 2022 Jan;93(1):58-71. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13639. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
6
Efficacy of the Chinese version interpretation bias modification training in an unselected sample: A randomized trial.中文版解释偏向修正训练在未选择样本中的疗效:一项随机试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 28;16(7):e0255224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255224. eCollection 2021.
7
Targets' Social Relationships as Antecedents and Consequences of Workplace Bullying: A Social Network Perspective.作为职场霸凌的前因和后果的目标对象的社会关系:一种社会网络视角
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 31;10:3077. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03077. eCollection 2019.
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 21;7(1):260. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00310-9.
4
"What I believe is true": Belief-confirming reasoning bias in social anxiety disorder.“我所相信的即为真实”:社交焦虑障碍中的信念确认推理偏差。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;53:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.03.013.
5
Unanimous versus partial rejection: How the number of excluders influences the impact of ostracism in children.一致排斥与部分排斥:排斥者的数量如何影响儿童中排斥行为的影响
Aggress Behav. 2017 Apr;43(2):190-203. doi: 10.1002/ab.21674. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
6
On Being Rejected: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research on Rejection.被拒绝:关于拒绝的实验研究的元分析。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Sep;4(5):468-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01158.x.
7
The ordinal effects of ostracism: a meta-analysis of 120 Cyberball studies.排斥的序数效应:对120项网络投球研究的元分析。
PLoS One. 2015 May 29;10(5):e0127002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127002. eCollection 2015.
8
Preschool social exclusion, aggression, and cooperation: a longitudinal evaluation of the need-to-belong and the social-reconnection hypotheses.学前儿童的社会排斥、攻击行为与合作:对归属需求和社会重新联结假设的纵向评估
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Dec;40(12):1637-47. doi: 10.1177/0146167214554591. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
9
Reactivity to exclusion prospectively predicts social anxiety symptoms in young adults.对被排斥的反应能力可预测年轻人的社交焦虑症状。
Behav Ther. 2013 Sep;44(3):470-8. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
10
Losing our humanity: the self-dehumanizing consequences of social ostracism.丧失人性:社会排斥的自我去人性化后果。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Feb;39(2):156-69. doi: 10.1177/0146167212471205.