• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伴侣注视影响精神病理学症状和人际协调之间的关系。

Partner gaze shapes the relationship between symptoms of psychopathology and interpersonal coordination.

机构信息

School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

School of Psychological Sciences and Performance and Expertise Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 21;14(1):14288. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65139-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-65139-5
PMID:38906960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11192736/
Abstract

Interpersonal coordination is a key determinant of successful social interaction but can be disrupted when people experience symptoms related to social anxiety or autism. Effective coordination rests on individuals directing their attention towards interaction partners. Yet little is known about the impact of the attentional behaviours of the partner themselves. As the gaze of others has heightened salience for those experiencing social anxiety or autism, addressing this gap can provide insight into how symptoms of these disorders impact coordination. Using a novel virtual reality task, we investigated whether partner gaze (i.e., direct vs. averted) influenced the emergence of interpersonal coordination. Results revealed: (i) spontaneous coordination was diminished in the averted (cf. direct) gaze condition; (ii) spontaneous coordination was positively related to symptoms of social anxiety, but only when partner gaze was averted. This latter finding contrasts the extant literature and points to the importance of social context in shaping the relationship between symptoms of psychopathology and interpersonal coordination.

摘要

人际协调是成功社交互动的关键决定因素,但当人们出现与社交焦虑或自闭症相关的症状时,这种协调可能会受到干扰。有效的协调取决于个体将注意力集中在互动伙伴身上。然而,人们对伙伴自身注意力行为的影响知之甚少。由于他人的注视对患有社交焦虑或自闭症的人来说更加显著,解决这一差距可以深入了解这些障碍的症状如何影响协调。我们使用一种新颖的虚拟现实任务来研究伴侣的注视(即直接注视与转移注视)是否会影响人际协调的出现。结果表明:(i)在转移(相对于直接)注视条件下,自发性协调减少;(ii)自发性协调与社交焦虑症状呈正相关,但仅在伴侣转移注视时才如此。这后一个发现与现有文献形成对比,表明社会背景在塑造精神病理学症状与人际协调之间的关系方面具有重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42da/11192736/291331ba9483/41598_2024_65139_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42da/11192736/559e7321647c/41598_2024_65139_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42da/11192736/1bebf70d3113/41598_2024_65139_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42da/11192736/b496dba423c9/41598_2024_65139_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42da/11192736/2c1e8082006f/41598_2024_65139_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42da/11192736/291331ba9483/41598_2024_65139_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42da/11192736/559e7321647c/41598_2024_65139_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42da/11192736/1bebf70d3113/41598_2024_65139_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42da/11192736/b496dba423c9/41598_2024_65139_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42da/11192736/2c1e8082006f/41598_2024_65139_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42da/11192736/291331ba9483/41598_2024_65139_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Partner gaze shapes the relationship between symptoms of psychopathology and interpersonal coordination.伴侣注视影响精神病理学症状和人际协调之间的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 21;14(1):14288. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65139-5.
2
No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm.自闭症成人在直视与回避目光上没有偏好:一个强化偏好注视范式。
Mol Autism. 2020 Nov 18;11(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-00398-3.
3
Interacting with autistic virtual characters: intrapersonal synchrony of nonverbal behavior affects participants' perception.与自闭症虚拟角色互动:非言语行为的人际同步会影响参与者的感知。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Oct;274(7):1585-1599. doi: 10.1007/s00406-023-01750-3. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
4
Virtual social interactions in social anxiety--the impact of sex, gaze, and interpersonal distance.社交焦虑中的虚拟社交互动——性别、注视和人际距离的影响。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010 Oct;13(5):547-54. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0432. Epub 2010 Apr 3.
5
Brain mechanisms for processing direct and averted gaze in individuals with autism.自闭症个体处理直接注视和回避注视的大脑机制。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2011 Dec;41(12):1686-93. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1197-x.
6
Autistic young people adaptively use gaze to facilitate joint attention during multi-gestural dyadic interactions.自闭症青少年在多手势的双人互动中,通过适应性地使用目光来促进共同关注。
Autism. 2024 Jun;28(6):1565-1581. doi: 10.1177/13623613231211967. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
7
Gaze in a real-world social interaction: A dual eye-tracking study.现实世界社交互动中的注视:一项双眼追踪研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Oct;71(10):2162-2173. doi: 10.1177/1747021817739221. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
8
Interpersonal matching of autistic trait levels in typically developed individuals is associated with spontaneous gaze following and initiation during face-to-face social interaction.自闭症特质水平在典型发育个体中的人际匹配与面对面社交互动中自发的目光追随和发起有关。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2023 Sep;62(3):674-688. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12432. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
9
Is anyone looking at me? Direct gaze detection in children with and without autism.有人在看我吗?自闭症患儿与非自闭症患儿的直接注视检测。
Brain Cogn. 2008 Jul;67(2):127-39. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.12.001. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
10
The neural time course of evaluating self-initiated joint attention bids.评估自发共同注意请求的神经时间进程。
Brain Cogn. 2015 Aug;98:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the impact of attentional focus and partner gaze on interpersonal coordination.考察注意力焦点和同伴注视对人际协调的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02695-5.

本文引用的文献

1
The interacting partner as the immediate environment: Personality, interpersonal dynamics, and bodily synchronization.互动伙伴即即时环境:人格、人际动力学和身体同步。
J Pers. 2024 Feb;92(1):180-201. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12828. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
2
Avatar Embodiment. Towards a Standardized Questionnaire.阿凡达化身。迈向标准化问卷。
Front Robot AI. 2018 Jun 22;5:74. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00074. eCollection 2018.
3
How Interpersonal Coordination Affects Individual Behavior (and Vice Versa): Experimental analysis and adaptive HKB model of social memory.
人际协调如何影响个体行为(反之亦然):社会记忆的实验分析与自适应HKB模型
Ecol Psychol. 2018;30(3):224-249. doi: 10.1080/10407413.2018.1438196. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
4
Coordination Dynamics: A Foundation for Understanding Social Behavior.协调动力学:理解社会行为的基础。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Aug 14;14:317. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00317. eCollection 2020.
5
Body sway predicts romantic interest in speed dating.身体摇摆预示着速配约会中的浪漫兴趣。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Jan 18;16(1-2):185-192. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa093.
6
Guidelines for immersive virtual reality in psychological research.心理学研究中沉浸式虚拟现实指南。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Dec;36:71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 May 11.
7
Interpersonal Synchrony in Autism.自闭症中的人际同步性。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020 Feb 5;22(3):12. doi: 10.1007/s11920-020-1135-8.
8
Evaluating the interplay between subclinical levels of mental health symptoms and coordination dynamics.评估心理健康症状的亚临床水平与协调动力学之间的相互作用。
Br J Psychol. 2020 Nov;111(4):782-804. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12426. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
9
Nonverbal synchrony in virtual reality.虚拟现实中的非言语同步。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 16;14(9):e0221803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221803. eCollection 2019.
10
Social Anxiety and Pro-social Behavior Following Varying Degrees of Rejection: Piloting a New Experimental Paradigm.不同程度拒绝后的社交焦虑和亲社会行为:一种新实验范式的初步试验
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 21;10:1325. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01325. eCollection 2019.