Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Aggress Behav. 2022 Nov;48(6):529-545. doi: 10.1002/ab.22026. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
Social rejection elicits profound feelings of distress. From an evolutionary perspective, the best way to alleviate this distress is to behave prosocially, minimizing the likelihood of further exclusion. Yet, examples ranging from the playground to the pub suggest rejection commonly elicits aggression. Opposing theoretical perspectives and discordant empirical results have left a basic question unanswered: does rejection more commonly elicit prosocial or aggressive behavior? We conducted three meta-analyses (one with studies measuring aggressive behavior; one with studies measuring prosocial behavior; and one with studies measuring both aggressive and prosocial behavior; N = 3864) to quantify: (1) the extent to which social rejection elicits prosocial or aggressive behavior and (2) potential moderating effects on these relations. Random-effects models revealed medium effects such that social rejection potentiated aggressive behavior (k = 19; d = 0.41, p < .0001) and attenuated prosocial behavior (k = 7; d = 0.59, p < .0001), an effect that remained consistent even when participants were given the option to behave prosocially or aggressively (k = 15; d = 0.71, p < .0001). These results cast doubt on the theory that rejection triggers prosocial behavior, and instead suggest it is a robust elicitor of aggression. Statement of Relevance: To our knowledge, these meta-analyses are the first to directly test whether social rejection elicits aggressive or prosocial behavior. By including a comprehensive collection of both published and unpublished research studies, and examining a wide variety of previously untested moderators, we show that social rejection robustly elicits aggressive behavior and inhibits prosocial behavior. Additionally, we demonstrate that aggressive behavior following social rejection is not simply a function of limited choices in response options. In fact, aggressive behavior was evoked even when the option to engage in prosocial behavior was provided. Furthermore, we conducted a comprehensive narrative review of the neural mechanisms underlying social rejection-elicited aggressive and prosocial behavior to supplement primary analyses. Overall, we believe that our work makes a critical theoretical contribution to the field.
社会排斥会引发强烈的痛苦。从进化的角度来看,缓解这种痛苦的最佳方法是表现出亲社会行为,最大限度地减少进一步被排斥的可能性。然而,从操场到酒吧,各种例子表明,拒绝通常会引发攻击性。相反的理论观点和不一致的实证结果留下了一个基本问题没有答案:拒绝更常见的是引发亲社会行为还是攻击性行为?我们进行了三项荟萃分析(一项研究测量攻击性行为;一项研究测量亲社会行为;一项研究测量攻击性和亲社会行为;N=3864),以量化:(1)社会排斥引发亲社会或攻击性行为的程度;(2)这些关系的潜在调节作用。随机效应模型显示,中等效应表明,社会排斥增强了攻击性行为(k=19;d=0.41,p<.0001),减弱了亲社会行为(k=7;d=0.59,p<.0001),即使参与者有选择表现出亲社会或攻击性的选择,这种效应仍然保持一致(k=15;d=0.71,p<.0001)。这些结果对拒绝引发亲社会行为的理论提出了质疑,反而表明它是攻击性的强大诱发因素。相关性陈述:据我们所知,这些荟萃分析是首次直接测试社会排斥是否引发攻击性或亲社会行为。通过包括广泛的已发表和未发表的研究,以及检查以前未测试的各种广泛的调节因素,我们表明社会排斥强烈引发攻击性行为并抑制亲社会行为。此外,我们还表明,社会排斥后的攻击性行为不仅仅是反应选项有限选择的结果。事实上,即使提供了参与亲社会行为的选择,也会引发攻击性行为。此外,我们对社会排斥引起的攻击性和亲社会行为的神经机制进行了全面的叙述性综述,以补充主要分析。总的来说,我们相信我们的工作对该领域做出了重要的理论贡献。