Suppr超能文献

引领安全:领导力重点问题

Leading for Safety: A Question of Leadership Focus.

作者信息

Mattson Molnar Malin, Von Thiele Schwarz Ulrica, Hellgren Johnny, Hasson Henna, Tafvelin Susanne

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

MTO Safety AB, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Saf Health Work. 2019 Jun;10(2):180-187. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is considerable evidence that leadership influences workplace safety, but less is known about the relative importance of different leadership styles for safety. In addition, a leadership style characterized by an emphasis and a focus on promoting safety has rarely been investigated alongside other more general leadership styles.

METHODS

Data were collected through a survey to which 269 employees in a paper mill company responded. A regression analysis was conducted to examine the relative roles of transformational, transactional (management-by-exception active; MBEA), and safety-specific leadership for different safety behavioral outcomes (compliance behavior and safety initiative behaviors) and for minor and major injuries.

RESULTS

A safety-specific leadership contributed the most to the enhanced safety of the three different kinds of leadership. Transformational leadership did not contribute to any safety outcome over and above that of a safety-specific leadership, whereas a transactional leadership (MBEA) was associated with negative safety outcomes (fewer safety initiatives and increased minor injuries).

CONCLUSION

The most important thing for leaders aiming at improving workplace safety is to continuously emphasize safety, both in their communication and by acting as role models. This highlights the importance for leadership training programs aiming to improve safety to actually focus on safety-promoting communication and behaviors rather than general leadership. Furthermore, an overly monitoring and controlling leadership style can be detrimental to attempts at achieving improved workplace safety.

摘要

背景

有大量证据表明领导力会影响工作场所安全,但对于不同领导风格对安全的相对重要性了解较少。此外,一种以强调和专注于促进安全为特征的领导风格很少与其他更一般的领导风格一起被研究。

方法

通过一项调查收集数据,一家造纸厂公司的269名员工对该调查做出了回应。进行了回归分析,以检验变革型、交易型(主动例外管理;MBEA)和特定安全领导对不同安全行为结果(合规行为和安全主动行为)以及轻微和重大伤害的相对作用。

结果

在三种不同类型的领导中,特定安全领导对提高安全性的贡献最大。变革型领导在特定安全领导之外,对任何安全结果都没有贡献,而交易型领导(MBEA)与负面安全结果相关(安全主动行为较少且轻微伤害增加)。

结论

对于旨在提高工作场所安全的领导者来说,最重要的是在沟通和以身作则方面持续强调安全。这凸显了旨在提高安全的领导力培训项目实际关注促进安全的沟通和行为而非一般领导力的重要性。此外,过度监督和控制的领导风格可能不利于实现工作场所安全的改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a607/6598812/46ef904e2e94/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验