• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会阶层理论化及其在健康不平等研究中的应用。

Theorising social class and its application to the study of health inequalities.

作者信息

McCartney Gerry, Bartley Mel, Dundas Ruth, Katikireddi Srinivasa Vittal, Mitchell Rich, Popham Frank, Walsh David, Wami Welcome

机构信息

NHS Health Scotland, 5th Floor, Meridian Court, 5 Cadogan Street, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

SSM Popul Health. 2018 Nov 2;7:015-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.10.015. eCollection 2019 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.10.015
PMID:31297431
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6598164/
Abstract

The literature on health inequalities often uses measures of socio-economic position pragmatically to rank the population to describe inequalities in health rather than to understand social and economic relationships between groups. Theoretical considerations about the meaning of different measures, the social processes they describe, and how these might link to health are often limited. This paper builds upon Wright's synthesis of social class theories to propose a new integrated model for understanding social class as applied to health. This model incorporates several social class mechanisms: social background and early years' circumstances; Bourdieu's habitus and distinction; social closure and opportunity hoarding; Marxist conflict over production (domination and exploitation); and Weberian conflict over distribution. The importance of discrimination and prejudice in determining the opportunities for groups is also explicitly recognised, as is the relationship with health behaviours. In linking the different social class processes we have created an integrated theory of how and why social class causes inequalities in health. Further work is required to test this approach, to promote greater understanding of researchers of the social processes underlying different measures, and to understand how better and more comprehensive data on the range of social class processes these might be collected in the future.

摘要

关于健康不平等的文献通常从实用角度使用社会经济地位指标对人群进行排名,以描述健康方面的不平等,而非理解不同群体之间的社会和经济关系。对于不同指标的含义、它们所描述的社会过程以及这些过程如何与健康相联系的理论思考往往较为有限。本文基于赖特对社会阶级理论的综合,提出了一个新的综合模型,用于理解应用于健康领域的社会阶级。该模型纳入了多种社会阶级机制:社会背景和早年境遇;布迪厄的惯习和区隔;社会封闭和机会囤积;马克思主义关于生产的冲突(支配与剥削);以及韦伯主义关于分配的冲突。歧视和偏见在决定群体机会方面的重要性也得到了明确承认,与健康行为的关系亦是如此。在将不同的社会阶级过程联系起来的过程中,我们构建了一个关于社会阶级如何以及为何导致健康不平等的综合理论。还需要进一步开展工作来检验这一方法,以促进研究人员对不同指标背后的社会过程有更深入的理解,并了解未来如何更好、更全面地收集关于这些社会阶级过程范围的数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1dc/6598164/0641d1accd4d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1dc/6598164/c6a5d1b20648/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1dc/6598164/0641d1accd4d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1dc/6598164/c6a5d1b20648/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1dc/6598164/0641d1accd4d/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Theorising social class and its application to the study of health inequalities.社会阶层理论化及其在健康不平等研究中的应用。
SSM Popul Health. 2018 Nov 2;7:015-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.10.015. eCollection 2019 Apr.
2
Examining the impact of different social class mechanisms on health inequalities: A cross-sectional analysis of an all-age UK household panel study.考察不同社会阶层机制对健康不平等的影响:基于全年龄段英国家庭面板研究的横断面分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Nov;312:115383. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115383. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
3
Qualitative Study定性研究
4
Theory driven analysis of social class and health outcomes using UK nationally representative longitudinal data.利用英国全国代表性纵向数据进行理论驱动的社会阶层与健康结果分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Oct 28;19(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01302-4.
5
The use of Pierre Bourdieu's distinction concepts in scientific articles studying food and eating: A narrative review.皮埃尔·布迪厄的区分概念在研究食物与饮食的科学文章中的应用:一项叙述性综述。
Appetite. 2016 Jan 1;96:174-186. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
6
Two decades of Neo-Marxist class analysis and health inequalities: A critical reconstruction.二十年的新马克思主义阶级分析与健康不平等:批判性重构
Soc Theory Health. 2015 Aug;13(3-4):267-287. doi: 10.1057/sth.2015.17.
7
How theory can help to understand the potential impact of food environment policies on socioeconomic inequalities in diet: an application of Bourdieu's capital theory and the scarcity theory.理论如何帮助理解食品环境政策对饮食社会经济不平等的潜在影响:布迪厄资本理论和稀缺理论的应用。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;32(Suppl 4):iv66-iv70. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac052.
8
Placing intersectional inequalities in health.将交叉不平等问题纳入健康领域。
Health Place. 2022 May;75:102761. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102761. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
9
From developing to developed: Mechanisms of health inequalities among seniors in China and Japan under macro-field control.从发展中到发达:宏观领域调控下中国和日本老年人健康不平等的机制
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 5;13:956165. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.956165. eCollection 2022.
10
Capitals and capabilities: linking structure and agency to reduce health inequalities.资本与能力:连接结构与能动作用以减少健康不平等
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jan;74(2):236-44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.028. Epub 2011 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting depressive symptoms through social support: a machine learning approach in military populations.通过社会支持预测抑郁症状:军事人群中的机器学习方法
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2527547. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2527547. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
Socioeconomic inequalities in health among elderly people in Taiwan: A life course perspective.台湾老年人健康方面的社会经济不平等:生命历程视角
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 3;20(7):e0327191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327191. eCollection 2025.
3
Improving the validity of estimates of mortality inequalities by education in England & Wales.

本文引用的文献

1
Differential vulnerability and susceptibility: how to make use of recent development in our understanding of mediation and interaction to tackle health inequalities.差异易损性和易感性:如何利用我们对中介和相互作用理解的最新进展来解决健康不平等问题。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Feb 1;48(1):268-274. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy167.
2
Patterns of mortality by occupation in the UK, 1991-2011: a comparative analysis of linked census and mortality records.1991 - 2011年英国按职业划分的死亡率模式:对关联的人口普查和死亡率记录的比较分析
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Oct 23;2(11):e501-e512. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30193-7. eCollection 2017 Nov.
3
提高英格兰和威尔士按教育程度划分的死亡率不平等估计的有效性。
Popul Health Metr. 2025 May 1;23(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12963-025-00367-z.
4
The effect of cultural capital on the physical fitness level of a Chinese older adult population: chain mediation of household income and stockpiling of physical fitness goods.文化资本对中国老年人群体身体素质水平的影响:家庭收入与健身用品储备的链式中介作用
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 18;12:1473775. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1473775. eCollection 2024.
5
Economic, cultural, and social inequalities in potentially inappropriate medication: A nationwide survey- and register-based study in Denmark.潜在不适当用药中的经济、文化和社会不平等:丹麦全国性调查和基于登记的研究。
PLoS Med. 2024 Nov 20;21(11):e1004473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004473. eCollection 2024 Nov.
6
Social transition, socioeconomic status and self-rated health in China: evidence from a national cross-sectional survey (CGSS).社会转型、社会经济地位与自评健康在中国:来自全国性横截面调查的证据(CGSS)。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 6;12:1359609. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1359609. eCollection 2024.
7
Barriers and facilitators of self-management of diabetes amongst people experiencing socioeconomic deprivation: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis.经济社会地位剥夺人群中糖尿病自我管理的障碍和促进因素:系统评价和定性综合。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14070. doi: 10.1111/hex.14070.
8
Parental satisfaction with paediatric care with and without the support of an eHealth device: a quasi-experimental study in Sweden.家长对电子健康设备支持下和不支持下的儿科护理的满意度:瑞典的一项准实验研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 9;24(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10398-7.
9
What is missing from how we measure and understand the experience of poverty and deprivation in population health analyses?在人口健康分析中衡量和理解贫困和匮乏体验时,我们忽略了什么?
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Dec 9;33(6):974-980. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad174.
10
[Intersectionality as a theoretical-analytical tool to study health inequalities in the AmericasA interseccionalidade como ferramenta teórico-analítica para estudo das desigualdades em saúde nas Américas].[交叉性作为研究美洲健康不平等问题的理论分析工具 作为研究美洲健康不平等的理论分析工具的交叉性]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2023 Aug 31;47:e133. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2023.133. eCollection 2023.
Socioeconomic status as an effect modifier of alcohol consumption and harm: analysis of linked cohort data.
社会经济地位作为酒精消费与危害的效应修饰因素:关联队列数据分析
Lancet Public Health. 2017 May 10;2(6):e267-e276. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30078-6. eCollection 2017 Jun.
4
Dying younger in Scotland: Trends in mortality and deprivation relative to England and Wales, 1981-2011.苏格兰的早逝现象:1981年至2011年期间与英格兰和威尔士相比的死亡率及贫困状况趋势
Health Place. 2016 Jul;40:106-15. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 May 25.
5
Changes in mortality inequalities over two decades: register based study of European countries.二十年间死亡率不平等的变化:基于登记数据对欧洲国家的研究
BMJ. 2016 Apr 11;353:i1732. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1732.
6
Two decades of Neo-Marxist class analysis and health inequalities: A critical reconstruction.二十年的新马克思主义阶级分析与健康不平等:批判性重构
Soc Theory Health. 2015 Aug;13(3-4):267-287. doi: 10.1057/sth.2015.17.
7
A Systematic Literature Review of Studies Analyzing Inequalities in Health Expectancy among the Older Population.一项关于分析老年人群健康期望寿命不平等性的研究的系统文献综述
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 26;10(6):e0130747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130747. eCollection 2015.
8
Coupled Ethical-Epistemic Analysis of Public Health Research and Practice: Categorizing Variables to Improve Population Health and Equity.公共卫生研究与实践的伦理-认知耦合分析:对变量进行分类以改善人群健康与公平性
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jan;105(1):e36-e42. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302279.
9
Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: challenges and the potential to advance health equity.将交叉性理论纳入人口健康研究方法学中:挑战与推进健康公平的潜力。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jun;110:10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
10
What (or who) causes health inequalities: theories, evidence and implications?是什么(或谁)导致了健康不平等:理论、证据及影响?
Health Policy. 2013 Dec;113(3):221-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.021. Epub 2013 Jun 28.