• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎不稳定问卷的 Rasch 分析。

A Rasch analysis of the lumbar spine instability questionnaire.

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Jul;37(7):844-851. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1642429. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1080/09593985.2019.1642429
PMID:31298078
Abstract

: A study found that the Lumbar Spine Instability questionnaire predicts response to two different types of exercise therapy. This is the first decision tool that has predicted response to exercise for chronic low back pain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the Lumbar Spine Instability questionnaire using Rasch analysis. : Baseline data from patients included in a randomized controlled trial with chronic non-specific low back pain were included. Rasch Measurement Theory was used to assess the ordering of items along a common scale, data-to-model fit, Person Separation Index, unidimensionality and Differential Item Functioning. : Responses from 172 patients (102 females) underwent Rasch analysis. All Lumbar Spine Instability questionnaire items had fit residuals between ± 2.5 and Chi-Square values were non-significant with Bonferroni corrections. The Lumbar Spine Instability questionnaire demonstrated a Person Separation Index of 0.64, which is below the recommended cut-off of 0.7. Differential Item Functioning by different pain levels was identified for one item. : The Lumbar Spine Instability questionnaire was found to be unidimensional, suggesting that the use of a summary score is appropriate. However, the low Person Separation Index value suggests that more items may be needed to increase the questionnaire's ability to discriminate among individuals with high and low clinical instability.

摘要

一项研究发现,腰椎不稳定问卷可以预测两种不同类型的运动疗法的疗效。这是第一个预测慢性下腰痛运动反应的决策工具。本研究的目的是使用 Rasch 分析评估腰椎不稳定问卷。

本研究纳入了一项慢性非特异性下腰痛随机对照试验的患者基线数据。使用 Rasch 测量理论评估项目在共同量表上的排序、数据与模型拟合、个体分离指数、单维性和差异项目功能。

对 172 名患者(102 名女性)的反应进行了 Rasch 分析。腰椎不稳定问卷的所有项目残差均在±2.5 之间,卡方值经 Bonferroni 校正后无显著性差异。腰椎不稳定问卷的个体分离指数为 0.64,低于推荐的 0.7 临界值。一项研究发现不同疼痛水平的差异项目功能存在差异。

腰椎不稳定问卷具有单维性,表明使用总分是合适的。然而,个体分离指数值较低表明,可能需要更多的项目来提高问卷区分高、低临床不稳定个体的能力。

相似文献

1
A Rasch analysis of the lumbar spine instability questionnaire.腰椎不稳定问卷的 Rasch 分析。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Jul;37(7):844-851. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1642429. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
2
Rasch analysis, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire.Rasch 分析、土耳其版腰椎失稳问卷的信度和效度。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Mar 23;53(5):1120-1126. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5677. eCollection 2023.
3
Construct validity of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: a factor analytic and Rasch study.魁北克腰痛残疾量表的结构效度:一项因子分析和 Rasch 研究。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Aug;57(4):600-606. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06502-3. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
4
Clinimetric Testing of the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire.腰椎失稳问卷的计量测试研究。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Dec;48(12):915-922. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7866. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
5
Rasch validation of the revised body awareness rating questionnaire (BARQ-R) in adults with and without musculoskeletal pain.修订后的身体意识评定问卷(BARQ-R)在有和无肌肉骨骼疼痛的成年人中的 Rasch 验证。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 9;25(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07893-1.
6
Which Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire? Rasch analysis of four different versions tested in a Norwegian population.哪种 Roland-Morris 残疾问卷?在挪威人群中测试的四个不同版本的 Rasch 分析。
J Rehabil Med. 2013 Jul;45(7):670-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1166.
7
Rasch analysis of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire.患者自评肘部评估问卷的拉施分析
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Jun 20;13:84. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0275-8.
8
An Evaluation of the Structural Validity of the Work Limitation Questionnaire Using the Rasch Model.工作限制问卷的结构效度评价:使用 Rasch 模型。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr;102(4):633-644. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
9
A further Rasch analysis of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire in adults with chronic low back pain suggests the revision of its rating scale.进一步对慢性下腰痛成年患者 Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire 的 Rasch 分析表明,需要对其评分量表进行修订。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Feb;57(1):110-119. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06328-5. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
10
Rasch analysis of the Roland disability questionnaire.罗兰残疾问卷的拉施分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 1;28(1):79-84. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00019.

引用本文的文献

1
Rasch analysis, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire.Rasch 分析、土耳其版腰椎失稳问卷的信度和效度。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Mar 23;53(5):1120-1126. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5677. eCollection 2023.
2
Cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Persian version of the lumbar spine instability questionnaire.腰椎不稳定问卷波斯语版本的文化调适与心理测量评估
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 May 19;14(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00486-2.
3
Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol.
哪种运动治疗腰痛?(WELBack)试验预测腰痛患者运动治疗反应:一项验证性随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 20;11(1):e042792. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042792.