LRIT, URAC No 29, Rabat IT Center, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco.
DISP Lab, University of Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 12;9(1):10133. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46507-y.
Identifying influential spreaders in networks is an essential issue in order to prevent epidemic spreading, or to accelerate information diffusion. Several centrality measures take advantage of various network topological properties to quantify the notion of influence. However, the vast majority of works ignore its community structure while it is one of the main features of many real-world networks. In a recent study, we show that the centrality of a node in a network with non-overlapping communities depends on two features: Its local influence on the nodes belonging to its community, and its global influence on the nodes belonging to the other communities. Using global and local connectivity of the nodes, we introduced a framework allowing to redefine all the classical centrality measures (designed for networks without community structure) to non-overlapping modular networks. In this paper, we extend the so-called "Modular Centrality" to networks with overlapping communities. Indeed, it is a frequent scenario in real-world networks, especially for social networks where nodes usually belong to several communities. The "Overlapping Modular Centrality" is a two-dimensional measure that quantifies the local and global influence of overlapping and non-overlapping nodes. Extensive experiments have been performed on synthetic and real-world data using the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) epidemic model. Results show that the Overlapping Modular Centrality outperforms its alternatives designed for non-modular networks. These investigations provide better knowledge on the influence of the various parameters governing the overlapping community structure on the nodes' centrality. Additionally, two combinations of the components of the Overlapping Modular Centrality are evaluated. Comparative analysis with competing methods shows that they produce more efficient centrality scores.
识别网络中的有影响力的传播者对于防止疫情传播或加速信息扩散至关重要。有几种中心性度量方法利用了各种网络拓扑属性来量化影响的概念。然而,大多数工作忽略了网络的社区结构,而社区结构是许多现实世界网络的主要特征之一。在最近的一项研究中,我们表明,在具有非重叠社区的网络中,一个节点的中心性取决于两个特征:它对属于其社区的节点的局部影响,以及它对属于其他社区的节点的全局影响。我们利用节点的全局和局部连通性,引入了一个框架,允许将所有经典的中心性度量(为没有社区结构的网络设计的)重新定义为非重叠模块化网络。在本文中,我们将所谓的“模块化中心性”扩展到具有重叠社区的网络。事实上,这在现实世界网络中是一种常见的情况,尤其是对于社交网络,其中节点通常属于多个社区。“重叠模块化中心性”是一种二维度量,它量化了重叠和非重叠节点的局部和全局影响。我们使用易感染-感染-恢复(SIR)传染病模型在合成和真实世界数据上进行了广泛的实验。结果表明,重叠模块化中心性优于为非模块化网络设计的替代方法。这些研究提供了关于控制重叠社区结构的各种参数对节点中心性影响的更好的认识。此外,评估了重叠模块化中心性的两个分量的组合。与竞争方法的比较分析表明,它们产生了更有效的中心性得分。