Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, Institut Pascal, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, Institut Pascal, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2019 Sep;76:101635. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 28.
Developing methods to segment the liver in medical images, study and analyze it remains a significant challenge. The shape of the liver can vary considerably from one patient to another, and adjacent organs are visualized in medical images with similar intensities, making the boundaries of the liver ambiguous. Consequently, automatic or semi-automatic segmentation of liver is a difficult task. Moreover, scanning systems and magnetic resonance imaging have different settings and parameters. Thus the images obtained differ from one machine to another. In this article, we propose an automatic model-based segmentation that allows building a faithful 3-D representation of the liver, with a mean Dice value equal to 90.3% on CT and MRI datasets. We compare our algorithm with a semi-automatic method and with other approaches according to the state of the art. Our method works with different data sources, we use a large quantity of CT and MRI images from machines in various hospitals and multiple DICOM images available from public challenges. Finally, for evaluation of liver segmentation approaches in state of the art, robustness is not adequacy addressed with a precise definition. Another originality of this article is the introduction of a novel measure of robustness, which takes into account the liver variability at different scales.
开发医学图像中肝脏分割的方法,对其进行研究和分析仍然是一个重大挑战。肝脏的形状在不同患者之间差异很大,并且相邻器官在医学图像中的可视化强度相似,使得肝脏的边界变得不明确。因此,肝脏的自动或半自动分割是一项艰巨的任务。此外,扫描系统和磁共振成像具有不同的设置和参数。因此,不同机器获取的图像也不同。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于模型的自动分割方法,允许构建肝脏的忠实 3D 表示,在 CT 和 MRI 数据集上的平均 Dice 值等于 90.3%。我们根据最新技术将我们的算法与半自动方法和其他方法进行了比较。我们的方法适用于不同的数据源,我们使用来自不同医院机器的大量 CT 和 MRI 图像以及来自公共挑战的多个 DICOM 图像。最后,对于最新技术中肝脏分割方法的评估,稳健性没有得到充分的考虑,也没有给出精确的定义。本文的另一个创新之处在于引入了一种新的稳健性度量,该度量考虑了不同尺度的肝脏变异性。