Prevention Research Center, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ethn Dis. 2019 Jun 13;29(Suppl 2):377-384. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S2.377. eCollection 2019.
Rulemaking is one of the most important ways the federal government makes public policy. It frequently has significant impact on individuals, communities, and organizations. Yet, few of those directly affected are familiar with the rulemaking process, and even fewer understand how it works. This article describes a case study of the Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center for Health Disparities Research Health Information Technology (TCC HIT) Policy Project's approach to health-policy engagement using: 1) social media; and 2) a webinar to educate stakeholders on the rulemaking process and increase their level of meaningful engagement with the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) proposed rule public comment submission. The webinar "Paying for Quality: What Is the Impact on Health Equity" was promoted through Twitter and held in June 2016. In total, we posted 19 tweets using two distinct hashtags (#MACRA4Equity, #MACRA2Equity) to raise awareness of the upcoming MACRA proposed rule and its possible effects on health equity. Overall, 252 individuals registered for the webinar, and more than half participated (n=133). Most (67%) registrants reported that health policy was not the primary focus of their current position. Based on information provided in the webinar, 95% agreed that their understanding of the topic improved. By the end of the webinar, 44% of participants indicated that they planned to submit public comments for MACRA, a 12% increase compared with those who planned to submit at the time of registration. The TCC health-policy engagement strategy demonstrates the feasibility of engaging a diverse audience around health policy issues, particularly those who are not typically engaged in policy work.
规章制定是联邦政府制定公共政策的最重要方式之一。它经常对个人、社区和组织产生重大影响。然而,直接受其影响的人中,很少有人熟悉规章制定过程,甚至更少有人了解其运作方式。本文描述了跨学科协作中心健康差异研究健康信息技术(TCC HIT)政策项目使用以下两种方法来进行健康政策参与的案例研究:1)社交媒体;2)网络研讨会,以教育利益攸关方有关规章制定过程的知识,并提高他们对 2015 年《医疗保险获得和儿童健康保险计划再授权法案》(MACRA)拟议规则公众意见提交的有意义的参与度。名为“为质量付费:对健康公平的影响是什么”的网络研讨会通过 Twitter 进行宣传,并于 2016 年 6 月举行。我们总共发布了 19 条推文,使用了两个不同的标签:#MACRA4Equity 和 #MACRA2Equity,以提高对即将出台的 MACRA 拟议规则及其对健康公平可能产生的影响的认识。总共有 252 人注册了网络研讨会,其中一半以上(n=133)参加了网络研讨会。大多数(67%)注册者表示,健康政策不是他们目前职位的主要关注点。根据网络研讨会提供的信息,95%的人表示他们对该主题的理解有所提高。网络研讨会结束时,44%的参与者表示他们计划为 MACRA 提交公众意见,与注册时计划提交的人数相比增加了 12%。TCC 健康政策参与策略表明,围绕健康政策问题吸引不同受众,特别是那些通常不参与政策工作的受众,是可行的。