• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health Policy Engagement Strategy for the Health Information Technology Policy Project of the Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center for Health Disparities Research.健康信息科技政策项目的跨学科合作中心健康差异研究的健康政策参与策略。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Jun 13;29(Suppl 2):377-384. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S2.377. eCollection 2019.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Understanding Value-based Reimbursement Models and Trends in Orthopaedic Health Policy: An Introduction to the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015.理解基于价值的报销模式及骨科卫生政策趋势:2015年医疗保险准入与儿童健康保险计划再授权法案(MACRA)简介
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Nov;24(11):e136-e147. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00283.
4
Alternative payment models and urology.替代支付模式与泌尿外科
Curr Opin Urol. 2017 Jul;27(4):360-365. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000403.
5
Leveraging Science to Advance Health Equity: A Regional Health Policy Research Center's Approach.利用科学推进健康公平:区域卫生政策研究中心的方法。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Jun 13;29(Suppl 2):323-328. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S2.323. eCollection 2019.
6
Merit-Based Incentive Payment System: Meaningful Changes in the Final Rule Brings Cautious Optimism.基于绩效的激励支付系统:最终规则的重大变化带来谨慎乐观情绪。
Pain Physician. 2017 Jan-Feb;20(1):E1-E12.
7
Applying a Health Equity Lens to Evaluate and Inform Policy.运用健康公平视角评估和为政策提供信息。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Jun 13;29(Suppl 2):329-342. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S2.329. eCollection 2019.
8
Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act in Small to Medium-Sized Primary Care Practices.医疗保险可及性和儿童健康保险计划再授权法案在中小型初级保健机构中的应用。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Nov-Dec;33(6):942-952. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.06.200142.
9
The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) Made Simple for Medical and Radiation Oncologists: A Narrative Review.2015 年《平价医疗法案和儿童健康保险计划再授权法案》(MACRA)对医疗和放射肿瘤学家的简化:叙事性回顾。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 May 1;5(5):723-727. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5631.
10
Characterizing Twitter Content About HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for Women: Qualitative Content Analysis.描述关于女性 HIV 暴露前预防 (PrEP) 的 Twitter 内容:定性内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 11;25:e43596. doi: 10.2196/43596.

引用本文的文献

1
Achieving Health Equity through Science, Policy, and Partnerships.通过科学、政策和伙伴关系实现健康公平。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Jun 13;29(Suppl 2):317-320. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S2.317. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Why Public Comments Matter: The Case of the National Institutes of Health Policy on Single Institutional Review Board Review of Multicenter Studies.为什么公众意见很重要:以美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)关于单一机构审查委员会审查多中心研究的政策为例。
Acad Med. 2018 Aug;93(8):1157-1161. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002206.
2
Implementation of Digital Awareness Strategies to Engage Patients and Providers in a Lung Cancer Screening Program: Retrospective Study.实施数字认知策略,促使患者和医疗服务提供者参与肺癌筛查项目:回顾性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 15;20(2):e52. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8932.
3
MACRA and the Changing Medicare Payment Landscape.MACRA 与不断变化的医疗保险支付格局。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(10):2836-2841. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5954-8. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
4
MACRA Is Here to Stay.《医疗保险和医疗救助服务中心促进医保和医疗服务法案》将会持续存在。 (备注:MACRA全称为Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act,直译为医疗保险和医疗救助服务中心促进医保和医疗服务法案 ,是美国一项关于医保政策的法案,在没有更多背景信息情况下,按照要求直接翻译,若有更多背景信息,可提供更精准符合语境的译文)
Am J Transplant. 2017 Mar;17(3):591-592. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14204.
5
Health Justice: A Framework (and Call to Action) for the Elimination of Health Inequity and Social Injustice.健康正义:消除健康不平等和社会不公的框架(及行动呼吁)
Am Univ Law Rev. 2015;65(2):275-351.
6
Should We Fear the Unintended Consequences of MACRA?我们应该担心《医疗保险和医疗救助服务中心创新法案》的意外后果吗?
Fam Pract Manag. 2017 Jan/Feb;24(1):4.
7
The Social Determinants of Chronic Disease.慢性病的社会决定因素
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jan;52(1S1):S5-S12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.010.
8
Medicare Program; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive Under the Physician Fee Schedule, and Criteria for Physician-Focused Payment Models. Final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;医师费率表下的基于绩效的激励支付系统(MIPS)和替代支付模式(APM)激励措施,以及以医师为重点的支付模式标准。有意见征求期的最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Nov 4;81(214):77008-831.
9
Public Policy and Physician Involvement: Removing Barriers, Enhancing Impact.公共政策与医生参与:消除障碍,增强影响。
Am J Med. 2017 Jan;130(1):8-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.07.020. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
10
Physicians' Participation In ACOs Is Lower In Places With Vulnerable Populations Than In More Affluent Communities.在弱势群体较多的地区,医生参与负责医疗组织(ACO)的比例低于富裕社区。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Aug 1;35(8):1382-90. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1635.

健康信息科技政策项目的跨学科合作中心健康差异研究的健康政策参与策略。

Health Policy Engagement Strategy for the Health Information Technology Policy Project of the Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center for Health Disparities Research.

机构信息

Prevention Research Center, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Ethn Dis. 2019 Jun 13;29(Suppl 2):377-384. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S2.377. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.18865/ed.29.S2.377
PMID:31308609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6604782/
Abstract

Rulemaking is one of the most important ways the federal government makes public policy. It frequently has significant impact on individuals, communities, and organizations. Yet, few of those directly affected are familiar with the rulemaking process, and even fewer understand how it works. This article describes a case study of the Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center for Health Disparities Research Health Information Technology (TCC HIT) Policy Project's approach to health-policy engagement using: 1) social media; and 2) a webinar to educate stakeholders on the rulemaking process and increase their level of meaningful engagement with the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) proposed rule public comment submission. The webinar "Paying for Quality: What Is the Impact on Health Equity" was promoted through Twitter and held in June 2016. In total, we posted 19 tweets using two distinct hashtags (#MACRA4Equity, #MACRA2Equity) to raise awareness of the upcoming MACRA proposed rule and its possible effects on health equity. Overall, 252 individuals registered for the webinar, and more than half participated (n=133). Most (67%) registrants reported that health policy was not the primary focus of their current position. Based on information provided in the webinar, 95% agreed that their understanding of the topic improved. By the end of the webinar, 44% of participants indicated that they planned to submit public comments for MACRA, a 12% increase compared with those who planned to submit at the time of registration. The TCC health-policy engagement strategy demonstrates the feasibility of engaging a diverse audience around health policy issues, particularly those who are not typically engaged in policy work.

摘要

规章制定是联邦政府制定公共政策的最重要方式之一。它经常对个人、社区和组织产生重大影响。然而,直接受其影响的人中,很少有人熟悉规章制定过程,甚至更少有人了解其运作方式。本文描述了跨学科协作中心健康差异研究健康信息技术(TCC HIT)政策项目使用以下两种方法来进行健康政策参与的案例研究:1)社交媒体;2)网络研讨会,以教育利益攸关方有关规章制定过程的知识,并提高他们对 2015 年《医疗保险获得和儿童健康保险计划再授权法案》(MACRA)拟议规则公众意见提交的有意义的参与度。名为“为质量付费:对健康公平的影响是什么”的网络研讨会通过 Twitter 进行宣传,并于 2016 年 6 月举行。我们总共发布了 19 条推文,使用了两个不同的标签:#MACRA4Equity 和 #MACRA2Equity,以提高对即将出台的 MACRA 拟议规则及其对健康公平可能产生的影响的认识。总共有 252 人注册了网络研讨会,其中一半以上(n=133)参加了网络研讨会。大多数(67%)注册者表示,健康政策不是他们目前职位的主要关注点。根据网络研讨会提供的信息,95%的人表示他们对该主题的理解有所提高。网络研讨会结束时,44%的参与者表示他们计划为 MACRA 提交公众意见,与注册时计划提交的人数相比增加了 12%。TCC 健康政策参与策略表明,围绕健康政策问题吸引不同受众,特别是那些通常不参与政策工作的受众,是可行的。