Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China; Water Technology Center, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Control & Treatment of Heavy Metal Pollution, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China; Water Technology Center, Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Control & Treatment of Heavy Metal Pollution, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
Water Res. 2019 Oct 1;162:505-515. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
Water scarcity has become a global issue that has forced many communities to seek alternative water resources. The majority of water on the earth's surface comes from the sea. Seawater has the potential to mitigate water stress after proper treatment. In Hong Kong, seawater has been used directly for toilet flushing for more than 50 years and the seawater toilet flushing (SWTF) system serves 80% of the residents. However, its environmental feasibility remains unknown. This study is a pioneer evaluating the environmental performances of the SWTF system by comparing SWTF with other alternative water resources including desalinated seawater, desalinated wastewater effluent, centralized wastewater reclamation and on-site greywater reclamation systems, while the conventional long-distance imported water scenario is set as the baseline for comparison. This evaluation is first conducted in the Southern District and North New Territory in Hong Kong, demonstrating SWTF is significantly more environmentally-friendly than other alternative water resources, which is the only alternative water resource application approach with environmental impacts comparable with the conventional long-distance imported water scenario. On the contrary, other alternative water resources application approaches would result in additional environmental impacts. Seaside distances and effective population density are two major geographical impact factors effecting the environmental impacts of different water systems in these two districts. The benefits obtained from SWTF in fourteen cities in South China are further investigated. It is confirmed that SWTF can significantly relieve water stress with the lowest environmental impacts comparing with other alternative options in these cities if alternative water resources must be applied for domestic usage. However, the assessment from different aspects should be further conducted to compare these alternative water resources.
水资源短缺已成为全球性问题,迫使许多社区寻求替代水资源。地球表面的大部分水来自海洋。经过适当处理,海水有缓解水资源紧张的潜力。在香港,海水直接用于冲厕已经超过 50 年,海水冲厕(SWTF)系统为 80%的居民提供服务。然而,其环境可行性仍不清楚。本研究通过将 SWTF 与其他替代水资源(包括海水淡化水、海水淡化废水、集中式污水再生和现场灰水再生系统)进行比较,评估 SWTF 系统的环境性能,是评估该系统环境性能的先驱,同时将常规的远距离进口水方案设定为比较的基线。该评估首先在香港的南区和新界北部进行,结果表明 SWTF 比其他替代水资源更环保,是唯一一种与常规远距离进口水方案具有可比环境影响的替代水资源应用方法。相比之下,其他替代水资源应用方法会带来额外的环境影响。沿海距离和有效人口密度是影响这两个地区不同水系统环境影响的两个主要地理影响因素。进一步调查了华南 14 个城市中 SWTF 的效益。结果证实,如果必须将替代水资源用于家庭用途,与其他替代方案相比,SWTF 可以在这些城市中以最低的环境影响显著缓解水资源紧张。然而,应该从不同方面进行评估以比较这些替代水资源。